Adler, Charles

AbstractBackgroundChronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative disease that is characterized by perivascular foci of phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) notably in the depths of sulci, with varying patterns in the cerebral cortex. Prior studies show elevated flortaucipir (FTP) PET binding in former American professional football players(PRO). However, the association of p‐tau with clinical measures remains unclear using regional FTP SUVR as early signs of CTE related tau pathology. Graph theory (GT) takes advantages of the spatial variability in p‐tau load and allows the integration of regional measures to define GT based measures. Here we examine the GT based measures in two CTE cohorts to evaluate their utility in assessing p‐tau related pathology in CTE.MethodThe graph procedure was optimized in FTP PET images in a group of 26 PRO with reported cognitive and/or behavorial symptoms and 30 asymptomatic controls without a history of traumatic brain injury (the DETECT Study) and identified the GT measure, entorhinal tau strength, as the target metric with the best group separation between PRO and controls. The optimized graph procedures were then applied to the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project dataset (99 former PRO, 51 former college football players [COL], and 52 controls without exposure to repetitive head impacts [CTL]) and we examined entorhinal tau strength’s ability to differentiate the exposure groups and relationship to consensus based diagnoses of Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome (TES), the clinical syndrome associated with CTE.ResultEntorhinal tau strength was significantly different among the three exposure groups (p=0.0001) similar to regional SUVR measures (Figure 1). Regional SUVR did not differentiate players (PRO+COL) with and without TES, while entorhinal tau strength approached although did not reach significance (Figure 2). Entorhinal tau strength is the only FTP measure that showed significant differences (p=0.006) between those players with cognitive impairment and players without (Figure 3).ConclusionWhile there is still considerable overlap in between‐group measurements, GT based entorhinal tau strength, is potentially more sensitive in detecting tau changes in players with and without TES. Additional studies are necessary to clarify the value of this new measure in detecting underlying CTE pathology.

AbstractBackgroundWe previously reported that in our autopsy‐confirmed cohort of Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), DLB with parkinsonism (DLB+Park) predicted faster progression of UPDRS‐III scores compared to PDD, DLB without parkinsonism (DLB‐Park), and AD. This study examined annualized rate of change of UPDRS‐III subscales in our cohort.MethodsData included were from participants in Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases (AZSAND) with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB (n = 48), PDD (n = 98) or pure AD (n = 48), and longitudinal movement exams. Mixed effects model (accounting for age, education, and sex) was used to determine predicted mean UPDRS‐III and subscale scores (0‐4) for all groups. Individual UPDRS‐III subscale scores were derived for: Body Bradykinesia, Limb Bradykinesia, Gait, Postural Instability, Limb Rest Tremor, Neck Rigidity and Limb Rigidity. Where applicable, scores for multiple limbs involved were averaged.ResultsLongitudinal data was analyzed for over 1430‐participant years. Parkinsonism was present in 65.6% of DLB participants. PDD participants were more likely to be treated with dopaminergic agents (87.8%) compared to (p<0.001) DLB+Park (57.6%), DLB‐park (0%) and AD (2.1%). Frequency (29.4% vs. 29.0%) and severity (mean±SE = 0.4±0.07 and 0.4±0.12) of Limb Rest Tremor was similar for PDD and DLB+park. Limb Bradykinesia frequency and severity were PDD: 100%, 2.4±0.11, DLB+Park: 96.8%, 2.1±0.18, DLB‐Park: 20%, 0.4±0.23, and AD: 62%, 1.1±0.16. Frequency of gait abnormality was 98.5% in PDD, 90.3% in DLB+park, 60% in DLB‐Park and 57.8% in AD. Rigidity was most frequent in the PDD group (88.2%), followed by DLB+Park (71%), AD (19.6%), and none DLB‐park (0%). Over 8 years trajectories for limb bradykinesia and gait were greater for DLB+park than PDD (Figure 1, Cohen’s d range 0.89‐2.18 and 0.63‐1.99 over 8 years, p<0.001).ConclusionOur results suggest that DLB+Park group have faster motor progression predominantly related to gait abnormalities and limb bradykinesia. Future analyses will explore more convergent data, integrated effects of various measures and their differential contributions in this cohort.

Twelve cases (6 M, 6F; mean age 87.9) with incidental Lewy bodies (no clinical diagnosis of parkinsonism or dementia) had medical histories of supraventricular arrhythmia (6/12), dysphagia (5/12), depression (5/12) and falls (4/12). Standardized movement disorder assessments were performed antemortem on 6 cases. The mean Part III UPDRS score was 7 (range 2–14). Motor findings included kinetic tremor (5/6), rest tremor (3/6), postural instability (3/6), postural tremor (2/6), and voice tremor (2/6). Of these 6 cases one was considered to have a normal movement exam, 2 were diagnosed as essential tremor, and 3 as nonspecific tremor disorder. Mean MMSE score in 7 cases was 26.6 (range 23–30). Medical records review revealed 4/12 cases had cognitive impairment not meeting criteria for dementia. Of these 12 cases, 5 had received standardized cognitive assessments: 3 were categorized as cognitively normal and 2 as mild cognitive impairment. Our series of incidental Lewy body disease cases reveal a range of neurologic findings including tremor and cognitive impairment. Antemortem standardized evaluations suggest there may be early clinical markers for Lewy body disorders. Supported by the State of AZ Department of Health Services, NIA P30 AG19610 and the Prescott Family Parkinson's Initiative: a Partnership of the Michael J. Fox Foundation and the Arizona Parkinson's Disease Consortium.