Knopman, David

Background: Long COVID, the chronic sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection, has affected millions of people worldwide. However, its pathogenesis and treatment remain unknown. To address this critical gap, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) developed the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative that included the Viral Persistence and Reactivation, and Immune Dysregulation (RECOVER-VITAL) study as one of the first of five NIH-sponsored, integrated platform protocols to support the rigorous and rapid investigation of potential interventions for Long COVID. Methods: Experts across academia, the NIH, and the community of patients and caregivers were brought together to design the RECOVER-VITAL protocol. We present the challenges and rationale underpinning critical components of this protocol and provide evidence for use of the platform for efficient execution of current and future Long COVID clinical trials. Facets of the RECOVER-VITAL protocol, including inclusion criteria, intervention groups, study procedures, investigation of biomarkers, and endpoints, were carefully crafted to advance the current and future science and operations of Long COVID clinical trials, particularly in the absence of existing data. The initial trial within the RECOVER-VITAL platform evaluated two durations of an antiviral drug, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, to test the proposed etiology of viral persistence on the Long COVID symptom clusters of autonomic dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, and exercise intolerance. The primary outcome measures were patient-reported, and secondary outcomes included performance-based measures for each of the symptom clusters of interest. Conclusions: The RECOVER-VITAL platform protocol has substantial implications for the design and conduct of future Long COVID clinical trials.

Abstract Mobility and cognition impairments are common in older adults, but neurodegenerative pathology contributions are unclear. We examined cross-temporal associations of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)-specific and nonspecific neurodegenerative plasma biomarkers neurofilament light (NfL) with incident mobility and cognitive impairment in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. We hypothesized NfL would show stronger associations with mobility impairment than p-tau181 in a subset of 1,227 cognitively normal participants with biomarker data and no mobility impairment (mean age=75.5±5.0, 56% female, 23% Black) at visit 5 (2011-13). Participants were classified into five functional groups using data from up to four exams: no impairment (n = 587; referent), mobility impairment only (n = 266; gait speed< 0.8m/s), cognitive impairment only (n = 69; adjudicated dementia), dual impairment (n = 243; both) or decline-free death (n = 262) over a mean 6.3 years (0-11 years) of follow-up. A multinomial regression model estimated association of functional groups with p-tau-181 and NfL jointly, adjusted for cardiovascular and demographic factors, BMI, and kidney function. Relative prevalence ratios (RPR; 95% CI) are presented per one-unit higher log-base-2 transformed biomarker (doubling). For mobility and cognitive functional outcomes, p-tau-181 was more robustly supported [Mobility: RPR=1.36, (1.04,1.77); Cognitive: RPR=1.73, (1.10,2.70); Dual: RPR=1.78, (1.15,2.77)] than NfL [Mobility: RPR=1.14, (0.85,1.53); Cognitive: RPR=1.20, (0.70,2.05); Dual: RPR=1.65, (0.86,3.16)]; higher pTau-181 [RPR=1.60, (1.23,2.09)] and higher NfL [RPR=1.94, (1.39,2.71)] were associated with higher risk of decline-free death. A p-tau-181-x-NfL interaction term was not supported. Findings did not support NfL associations with functional outcomes with consideration of p-tau-181. AD blood biomarkers may help identify individuals at greater risk for multifaceted disability.

Abstract Although slower gait speed is associated with cognitive impairment, endurance may be more predictive in older adults with faster gait speed. We examined moderating effects of endurance on the relationship of gait speed with incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in cognitively normal ARIC participants (n = 2242, mean age=78.6 + 4.3, 58% female, 19% Black). At the sixth exam, endurance was assessed as distance walked at a fast pace (Two Minute Walk, 2MW); usual 4-meter gait speed was also assessed. Cognitive status was adjudicated during the 6th-9th exams (mean follow-up 5.1 years). Multinomial logistic regression models with a 2MW-x-gait speed interaction term estimated relative risk ratios (RRR) of MCI and dementia relative to normal cognition per SD higher gait speed or 2MW distance, adjusting for demographic and cardiovascular factors. Results used representative continuous gait speed and continuous 2MW distance values. Longer 2MW distance was associated with lower risk of MCI and dementia at gait speed <1m/s [e.g. gait speed=0.8: MCI RRR=0.59, 95%CI(0.42, 0.83); dementia RRR=0.29, (0.13, 0.63)] and with dementia at gait speed>1m/s [gait speed=1.2: RRR=0.28, (0.09, 0.81)], but not with MCI (RRR=0.85, (0.57, 1.26)]. Conversely, faster gait speed was associated with lower risk of MCI at low 2MW [100 m; RRR=0.84, (0.74, 0.94)], but was attenuated at high 2MW (150 m; RRR=0.91, (0.84, 1.00)]. A 2MW-x-gait speed interaction term was supported (p = 0.04), primarily driven by differential MCI associations. Combining endurance and gait speed may be especially helpful in identifying cognitively normal older adults at risk for impending early-stage cognitive impairment.

Abstract Faster gait speed and better endurance have been cross-sectionally and jointly associated with a lower likelihood of dementia. However, gait speed associations plateau above 1m/s, suggesting gait speed may be less predictive at near normal speeds. This study examined prospective associations of gait speed, endurance, and moderating effects of endurance on gait speed associations with incident dementia among ARIC participants without dementia at Visit 6 (2016-2017) who completed assessments of endurance ( 2- Minute Walk (2MW), meters) and usual-pace 4-meter gait speed (m/s) (n = 2767, mean age 78+/- 4.3 years, 43% male, 18% Black). Dementia was adjudicated using neuropsychological tests, functional assessments, informant interviews, and medical/vital record surveillance over a median of 3.3 years follow-up. Cox regression models estimated the hazard ratio (HR, 95% CI) for dementia, incorporating gait speed, 2MW, gait speed-by-2MW interaction, demographic, and cardiovascular factors. In separate models, each standard deviation higher 2MW [HR = 0.62, (0.50,0.76)] and faster gait speed [HR = 0.63, (0.50,0.81)] were associated with lower incident dementia risk. However, when jointly adjusting for 2MW and gait speed, higher 2MW was associated with a 32% lower incident dementia risk [HR = 0.68,(0.51, 0.90)], but faster gait speed was not statistically associated with incident dementia [HR = 0.85, (0.62,1.16)]. Moderating effects were not supported (gait speed-x-2MW interaction, p = 0.14). Although both endurance and gait speed predict dementia, endurance may be more informative across the gait speed spectrum, whereas gait speed may be more feasible for clinical settings. Longer follow-up and more dementia events may better inform differential utilities of gait speed and endurance measures.