Back to Authors

Arce-Camposano, Andrea

Mayo Clinic

University of Guayaquil

Citations 2

Total Thyroidectomy vs Lobectomy for Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Lincango, Eddy, Vilatuna-Andrango, Luis, Arce-Camposano, Andrea, Mena-García, Cristina, Figueroa, Luis, Herold, Sarah, Zaldumbide, Matias, Pacheco, Fernanda Ventorim , Cayambe, Jennifer, Romero-Velez, Gustavo, Diaz, Jose Matias Zaldumbide , Lincango, Eddy P., Zaldumbide Diaz, Jose Matias , Lincango-Naranjo, Eddy , Andrango, Luis Vilatuna, Zaldumbide, Jose Matias, Pacheco, Fernanda, Quilligana, Jennifer Marisol Cayambe , Solís-Pazmiño, Paola , Westmoreland, Tamarah J. , Lew, John I. , Drake, Frederick Thurston , Romero-Vélez, Gustavo , Sosa, Julie Ann , Brito, Juan P.

JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | February 26, 2026 | Volume: 152 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 400

10.1001/jamaoto.2025.5599 Get It

Importance Total thyroidectomy is the established surgical standard for hereditary and sporadic medullary thyroid cancer (sMTC). However, for unilateral sporadic tumors, its benefit over lobectomy remains uncertain. Objective To compare oncologic outcomes between total thyroidectomy and lobectomy in patients with sMTC. Data Sources and Study Selection MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to December 2025 to identify comparative studies on patients with sMTC who underwent total thyroidectomy or lobectomy. Data Extraction and Synthesis Reviewers working independently and in duplicate screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for eligibility using standardized instructions. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses ( PRISMA ) and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology ( MOOSE ) guidelines were used for reporting. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were mortality, overall survival, structural recurrence, biochemical cure, and distant metastasis development. The secondary outcome was postoperative complications. Effect measures were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) or relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs using a random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results Nine retrospective studies met inclusion criteria and comprised 1371 patients (295 of 397 patients [74.3%] with documented sex were female, and median age ranged from 45.0 to 58.2 years). A total of 531 patients (38.7%) underwent lobectomy and 840 (61.3%) underwent total thyroidectomy. Of 341 tumors, 280 (82.1%) lacked extrathyroidal extension, 284 of 401 tumors (70.8%) measured smaller than 2 cm (70.8%), and 197 of 343 tumors (57.4%) were node negative; central neck dissection was performed in 445 of 492 patients (90.4%). Multifocal disease was uncommon and reported in 30 of 330 patients (9.1%). Mortality did not differ at 5 years (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.07-1.35) or beyond (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.40-2.47). Overall survival at 5 years was similar (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.11). Total thyroidectomy was not associated with lower structural recurrence rates at 5 years (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.14-1.49), but it was associated beyond 5 years (OR, 7.26; 95% CI, 1.07-49.21). No differences were observed for biochemical cure at 5 years (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.47-1.56) or beyond 5 years (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.26-2.89). Distant metastasis development did not differ at 5 years (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.09-31.52). Sensitivity analyses revealed no differences across any outcomes. Postoperative complications were more common in total thyroidectomy. Risk of bias was high in 4 studies, moderate in 4, and low in 1. Conclusions and Relevance Findings in this systematic review and meta-analysis, based on data from retrospective studies, suggest that thyroid lobectomy may be associated with oncologic outcomes comparable to total thyroidectomy in selected patients with sMTC.
Drug Repurposing for Reducing the Size of Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review
Jacome, Cristian Soto , Arce-Camposano, Andrea, Toro-Tobón, David , Zahidy, Misk Al, Rivadeneira, Francisco, Fierro, Francisco E, Montero, Marcelo, Ospina, Naykky Singh , Soto Jacome, Cristian , Al Zahidy, Misk, Ponce, Oscar, Singh Ospina, Naykky , Brito, Juan P , Toro-Tobon, David , Rivadeneira, Francisco, Fierro, Francisco Emilio , Montero, Marcelo, Ponce, Oscar J. , Brito, Juan P.

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e327-e338

10.1210/clinem/dgaf616 Get It

Abstract Context Benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) are highly prevalent, and current treatment options are primarily invasive. There is a need for effective, noninvasive alternatives. Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of repurposed pharmacologic agents in reducing the size of BTNs. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Scopus were searched from inception to December 18, 2024. Study Selection We included preclinical and clinical studies evaluating repurposed drugs for BTNs in adults. Of 1499 records screened, 20 studies met inclusion criteria: 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 6 prospective cohorts, 3 retrospective observational studies, 3 case reports, 1 cross-sectional study, and 1 preclinical study. Data Extraction Data were extracted independently in duplicate using a standardized form. Data Synthesis Narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity. Metformin was the most frequently evaluated agent (7 studies), with 5 studies (including 2 RCTs) reporting statistically significant reductions in dominant nodule volume. One prospective study demonstrated a reduction in the maximum nodule diameter, which was not statistically significant, and 1 RCT showed no changes in nodule size after intervention. Statins (4 studies) and somatostatin analogues (4 studies) showed mixed results. Myo-inositol with selenium, herbal formulations, and immune checkpoint inhibitors showed promise in single studies or case reports. Conclusion Metformin shows the most consistent potential for noninvasive reduction of BTN size, particularly in patients with metabolic comorbidities. However, current evidence is limited and heterogeneous. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm efficacy and guide clinical use.