Cohen, Tal

ABSTRACT Introduction and Objectives Female urethral strictures remain a challenging clinical entity with limited data on optimal reconstructive techniques. This study presents 12‐month clinical and patient‐reported outcomes following a novel transurethral approach to dorsal inlay buccal graft urethroplasty. Methods We evaluate the outcomes of consecutive female patients with urethral strictures treated via dorsal inlay buccal graft urethroplasty from October 2021 to November 2024. Preoperative evaluation included cystoscopy, uroflowmetry, and/or voiding cystourethrogram. Follow‐up at 4 and 12 months included cystoscopy, uroflowmetry, and patient‐reported outcomes measured via the Global Response Assessment. Success was defined as absence of recurrence on cystourethroscopy. Results Twenty‐one patients were included in the study, with 95% having undergone prior treatments (90% dilation/DVIU and 9% urethroplasty). Stricture locations varied across the distal (33%), mid (19%), proximal (19%), and multifocal/pan urethral (19%). The median operative duration was 60 min (IQR: 56–86) and all were discharged on the day of surgery. Nineteen patients (90%) underwent a dorsal inlay procedure, while two (10%) required combined dorsal and ventral inlay due to obliterative stricture. No complications were observed. The median follow‐up was 13.2 (IQR: 5.1–23.5) months, during which time 1 patient underwent retreatment for recurrent stricture. Clinical success was 95% at 4 months and 92% at 12 months. Median peak urinary flow rate preoperatively versus 4‐month postoperatively was 7.0 cc/s versus 13.0 cc/s ( p = 0.20) and at 12‐month postoperatively was 13.3 cc/s ( p = 0.50). 90% of patients reported improvement on the Global Response Assessment. There were no cases of de novo stress urinary incontinence. Conclusions This novel transurethral dorsal inlay buccal graft urethroplasty offers a safe and efficient treatment for female urethral strictures with durable clinical and patient‐reported outcomes at 12 months. The technique's minimal urethral mobilization translates into shorter operative times and a low risk of stress incontinence, making it a promising alternative to traditional approaches.

Purpose: Surgical video review can be used in urologic training, yet significant barriers to the implementation of video review programs exist, and formal assessment of usage and utility for trainees is limited. Here, we evaluate a novel video review platform to describe patterns of use and determine perceived utility. Materials and Methods: We analyzed learning points entered by trainees during video review of radical prostatectomy cases using our surgical intelligence–enabled Film Room platform between September 2023 and July 2024. Learning point content was categorized according to surgical coaching domains as technical, cognitive, nontechnical, or descriptive. Entries were compared by surgical step and level of training. Anonymous surveys were distributed to trainees to determine perceived utility and reveal patterns of video review. Results: Thirteen trainees entered 480 unique learning points across all radical prostatectomy steps and spanning surgical coaching domains during the study period. Learning points varied by training level, with junior trainees entering points more often than senior trainees for Retzius-space dissection ( N = 73 vs 17, p < 0.01) and seminal vesicle and posterior dissection ( N = 58 vs 27, p < 0.01). Trainees used video review in preparation for both upcoming cases and performance analysis. Ninety-four percent of survey respondents reported they either agreed or strongly agreed that video review helped them develop surgical skills. Conclusions: We found usage across training levels and high perceived utility of our Film Room platform for video review of robotic prostatectomy. Implementation of video review platforms holds promise to augment existing urologic training and should be explored further.

Abstract Background As perception of penile curvature varies widely, we sought to understand how adults perceive curvature and how these opinions compare with those of patients with curvature, specifically Peyronie’s disease (PD). Aim To investigate the perspectives of curvature correction from adults with and without PD, as well as differences within demographics. Methods A cross-sectional survey was administered to adult patients and nonpatient companions in general urology clinics at 3 institutions across the United States. Men, women, and nonbinary participants were recruited. Patients were grouped as having PD vs andrology conditions without PD vs general urology conditions plus companions. The survey consisted of unlabeled 2-dimensional images of penis models with varying degrees of curvature. Participants selected images that they would want surgically corrected for themselves and their children. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify demographic variables associated with willingness to correct. Outcomes Our main outcome was to detect differences in threshold to correct curvature between those with and without PD. Results Participants were grouped as follows: PD (n = 141), andrology (n = 132), and general (n = 302) . Respectively, 12.8%, 18.9%, and 19.9% chose not to surgically correct any degree of curvature (P = .17). For those who chose surgical correction, the mean threshold for correction was 49.7°, 51.0°, and 51.0° (P = .48); for their children, the decision not to correct any degree of curvature was 21.3%, 25.4%, and 29.3% (P = .34), which was significantly higher than correction for themselves (P &lt; .001). The mean threshold for their children’s correction was 47.7°, 53.3°, and 49.4° for the PD, andrology, and general groups (P = .53), with thresholds no different vs themselves (P = .93). On multivariable analysis, no differences were seen in demographics within the PD and andrology groups. In the general group, participants aged 45 to 54 years and those who identified as LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) had a higher threshold for correction as compared with their counterparts when factoring other demographic variables (63.2° vs 48.8°, P = .001; 62.1° vs 50.4°, P = .05). Clinical Implications With changing times and viewpoints, this study stresses the importance of shared decision making and balancing risks and benefits to correction of penile curvature. Strengths and Limitations Strengths include the broad population surveyed. Limitations include the use of artificial models. Conclusion No significant differences were seen in the decision to surgically correct curvature between participants with and without PD, with participants being less likely to choose surgical correction for their children.