Yeaman, Clinton

Abstract Background As perception of penile curvature varies widely, we sought to understand how adults perceive curvature and how these opinions compare with those of patients with curvature, specifically Peyronie’s disease (PD). Aim To investigate the perspectives of curvature correction from adults with and without PD, as well as differences within demographics. Methods A cross-sectional survey was administered to adult patients and nonpatient companions in general urology clinics at 3 institutions across the United States. Men, women, and nonbinary participants were recruited. Patients were grouped as having PD vs andrology conditions without PD vs general urology conditions plus companions. The survey consisted of unlabeled 2-dimensional images of penis models with varying degrees of curvature. Participants selected images that they would want surgically corrected for themselves and their children. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify demographic variables associated with willingness to correct. Outcomes Our main outcome was to detect differences in threshold to correct curvature between those with and without PD. Results Participants were grouped as follows: PD (n = 141), andrology (n = 132), and general (n = 302) . Respectively, 12.8%, 18.9%, and 19.9% chose not to surgically correct any degree of curvature (P = .17). For those who chose surgical correction, the mean threshold for correction was 49.7°, 51.0°, and 51.0° (P = .48); for their children, the decision not to correct any degree of curvature was 21.3%, 25.4%, and 29.3% (P = .34), which was significantly higher than correction for themselves (P < .001). The mean threshold for their children’s correction was 47.7°, 53.3°, and 49.4° for the PD, andrology, and general groups (P = .53), with thresholds no different vs themselves (P = .93). On multivariable analysis, no differences were seen in demographics within the PD and andrology groups. In the general group, participants aged 45 to 54 years and those who identified as LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) had a higher threshold for correction as compared with their counterparts when factoring other demographic variables (63.2° vs 48.8°, P = .001; 62.1° vs 50.4°, P = .05). Clinical Implications With changing times and viewpoints, this study stresses the importance of shared decision making and balancing risks and benefits to correction of penile curvature. Strengths and Limitations Strengths include the broad population surveyed. Limitations include the use of artificial models. Conclusion No significant differences were seen in the decision to surgically correct curvature between participants with and without PD, with participants being less likely to choose surgical correction for their children.

Abstract Introduction Perception of penile curvature (PC) varies widely, and correction of PC is in the eye of the beholder. Objective We sought to investigate if patients with Peyronie’s Disease (PD) had differing opinions on correction of PC compared to general andrology (AD) patients without PD and general urology (URO) patients. Methods A cross-sectional survey was administered to adult patients in andrology and general urology clinics at 3 geographically separate institutions. Patients were grouped with having PD vs AD vs URO conditions. The survey consisted of unlabeled images of penis models with varying degrees of PC (range 10-90°). Respondents were asked to select the images they would want surgically corrected. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify demographic variables associated with willingness to consider correction. Results Ninety-four PD, 106 AD, and 302 URO patients were recruited. When comparing the 3 groups, besides obvious gender differences with PD patients, PD patients were less in 25-34 age range and more in 55-64 age range (p=0.01 and p=0.007). PD was less represented in Mid-Atlantic (p<0.001). 8% of PD, 12% of AD, and 20% of URO patients chose not to surgically correct any degree of PC (p=0.001). Among those who endorsed willingness to surgically correct PC, the average threshold for correction was 52.5° (SD 13) for PD, 37.2° (SD 29.5) for AD, and 51.0° (SD 19.9) for URO patients. When comparing PD patients with AD patients, no difference in the decision to surgically correct was found (p=0.42). This was also found to be the case when comparing PD with URO (p=0.46) and PD+AD patients vs URO (p=0.67). On univariable analysis, among AD patients, those ages 55-64 were more willing to undergo PC correction at lower degrees of PC (p=0.03) but did not hold up on multivariable analysis (p=0.40). No other demographic factors among PD and AD groups were found to have an impact on willingness to undergo PC correction (Table 1). Conclusions No significant differences were seen in the decision to surgically correct PC when comparing the perspectives of patients with PD, AD, and URO. Roughly 10% of all of these patients would defer on surgical management of any degree of PC. Despite having PC, no demographic differences were seen among PD patients’ willingness to correct PC. Disclosure No