Rizza, Robert A.

To determine if enteral delivery of glucose influences splanchnic glucose metabolism, 10 subjects were studied when glucose was either infused into the duodenum at a rate of 22 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 and supplemental glucose given intravenously or when all glucose was infused intravenously while saline was infused intraduodenally. Hormone secretion was inhibited with somatostatin, and glucose (∼8.5 mmol/l) and insulin (∼450 pmol/l) were maintained at constant but elevated levels. Intravenously infused [6,6- 2 H 2 ]glucose was used to trace the systemic appearance of intraduodenally infused [3- 3 H]glucose, whereas UDP-glucose flux (an index of hepatic glycogen synthesis) was measured using the acetaminophen glucuronide method. Despite differences in the route of glucose delivery, glucose production (3.5 ± 1.0 vs. 3.3 ± 1.0 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 ) and glucose disappearance (78.9 ± 5.7 vs. 85.0 ± 7.2 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 ) were comparable on intraduodenal and intravenous study days. Initial splanchnic glucose extraction (17.5 ± 4.4 vs. 14.5 ± 2.9%) and hepatic UDP-glucose flux (9.0 ± 2.0 vs. 10.3 ± 1.5 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 ) also did not differ on the intraduodenal and intravenous study days. These data argue against the existence of an “enteric” factor that directly (i.e., independently of circulating hormone concentrations) enhances splanchnic glucose uptake or hepatic glycogen synthesis in nondiabetic humans.

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Hyperoxia blunts hypoglycaemia counterregulation in healthy adults. We hypothesized that this effect is mediated by the carotid bodies and that: (i) hyperoxia would have no effect on hypoglycaemia counterregulation in carotid body‐resected patients; and (ii) carotid body‐resected patients would exhibit an impaired counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia. What is the main finding and its importance? Our data indicate that the effect of hyperoxia on hypoglycaemic counterregulation is mediated by the carotid bodies. However, a relatively normal counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia in carotid body‐resected patients highlights: (i) the potential for long‐term adaptations after carotid body resection; and (ii) the importance of redundant mechanisms in mediating hypoglycaemia counterregulation. Hyperoxia reduces hypoglycaemia counterregulation in healthy adults. We hypothesized that this effect is mediated by the carotid bodies and that: (i) hyperoxia would have no effect on hypoglycaemia counterregulation in patients with bilateral carotid body resection; and (ii) carotid body‐resected patients would exhibit an impaired counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia. Five patients (three male and two female) with bilateral carotid body resection for glomus tumours underwent two 180 min hyperinsulinaemic, hypoglycaemic (∼3.3 mmol l−1) clamps separated by a minimum of 1 week and randomized to either normoxia (21% fractional inspired O2) or hyperoxia (100% fractional inspired O2). Ten healthy adults (seven male and three female) served as control subjects. Hypoglycaemia counterregulation in carotid body‐resected patients was not significantly altered by hyperoxia (area under the curve expressed as a percentage of the normoxic response: glucose infusion rate, 111 ± 10%; cortisol, 94 ± 6%; glucagon, 107 ± 7%; growth hormone, 92 ± 10%; adrenaline, 89 ± 26%; noradrenaline, 79 ± 15%; main effect of condition, P > 0.05). This is in contrast to previously published results from healthy adults. However, the counterregulatory responses to hypoglycaemia during normoxia were not impaired in carotid body‐resected patients when compared with control subjects (main effect of group, P > 0.05). Our data provide further corroborative evidence that the effect of hyperoxia on hypoglycaemic counterregulation is mediated by the carotid bodies. However, relatively normal counterregulatory responses to hypoglycaemia in carotid body‐resected patients highlight the importance of redundant mechanisms in mediating hypoglycaemia counterregulation.

The simultaneous assessment of insulin action, secretion, and hepatic extraction is key to understanding postprandial glucose metabolism in nondiabetic and diabetic humans. We review the oral minimal method (i.e., models that allow the estimation of insulin sensitivity, β-cell responsivity, and hepatic insulin extraction from a mixed-meal or an oral glucose tolerance test). Both of these oral tests are more physiologic and simpler to administer than those based on an intravenous test (e.g., a glucose clamp or an intravenous glucose tolerance test). The focus of this review is on indices provided by physiological-based models and their validation against the glucose clamp technique. We discuss first the oral minimal model method rationale, data, and protocols. Then we present the three minimal models and the indices they provide. The disposition index paradigm, a widely used β-cell function metric, is revisited in the context of individual versus population modeling. Adding a glucose tracer to the oral dose significantly enhances the assessment of insulin action by segregating insulin sensitivity into its glucose disposal and hepatic components. The oral minimal model method, by quantitatively portraying the complex relationships between the major players of glucose metabolism, is able to provide novel insights regarding the regulation of postprandial metabolism.

Background: A simulation model of the glucose—insulin system in normal life conditions can be very useful in diabetes research, e.g., testing insulin infusion algorithms and decision support systems and assessing glucose sensor performance and patient and student training. A new meal simulation model has been proposed that incorporates state-of-the-art quantitative knowledge on glucose metabolism and its control by insulin at both organ/tissue and whole-body levels. This article presents the interactive simulation software GIM (glucose insulin model), which implements this model. Methods: The model is implemented in MATLAB, version 7.0.1, and is designed with a windows interface that allows the user to easily simulate a 24-hour daily life of a normal, type 2, or type 1 diabetic subject. A Simulink version is also available. Three meals a day are considered. Both open- and closed-loop controls are available for simulating a type 1 diabetic subject. Results: Software options are described in detail. Case studies are presented to illustrate the potential of the software, e.g., compare a normal subject vs an insulin-resistant subject or open-loop vs closed-loop insulin infusion in type 1 diabetes treatment. Conclusions: User-friendly software that implements a state-of-the-art physiological model of the glucose-insulin system during a meal has been presented. The GIM graphical interface makes its use extremely easy for investigators without specific expertise in modeling.

The contribution of elevated glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) to postprandial glucose metabolism after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been the subject of uncertainty. We used exendin-9,39, a competitive antagonist of GLP-1, to examine glucose metabolism, islet hormone secretion, and gastrointestinal transit in subjects after RYGB and in matched control subjects. Subjects were studied in the presence or absence of exendin-9,39 infused at 300 pmol/kg/min. Exendin-9,39 resulted in an increase in integrated postprandial glucose concentrations post-RYGB (3.6 ± 0.5 vs. 2.0 ± 0.4 mol/6 h, P = 0.001). Exendin-9,39 decreased insulin concentrations (12.3 ± 2.2 vs. 18.1 ± 3.1 nmol/6 h, P = 0.002) and the β-cell response to glucose (ϕTotal, 13 ± 1 vs. 11 ± 1 × 10−9 min−1, P = 0.01) but did not alter the disposition index (DI). In control subjects, exendin-9,39 also increased glucose (2.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.7 ± 0.3 mol/6 h, P = 0.03) without accompanying changes in insulin concentrations, resulting in an impaired DI. Post-RYGB, acceleration of stomach emptying during the first 30 min by exendin-9,39 did not alter meal appearance, and similarly, suppression of glucose production and stimulation of glucose disappearance were unaltered in RYGB subjects. These data indicate that endogenous GLP-1 has effects on glucose metabolism and on gastrointestinal motility years after RYGB. However, it remains uncertain whether this explains all of the changes after RYGB.

People with NIDDM are resistant to insulin. The present studies sought to determine whether the ability of glucose to regulate its own metabolism in the presence of basal insulin concentrations is impaired. To address this question, basal insulin concentrations were maintained constant with an exogenous insulin infusion, while endogenous hormone secretion was inhibited by somatostatin. The integrated glycemic response above baseline during identical prandial glucose infusions was greater (1,411 ± 94 vs. 938 ± 45 mmol/l per 5 h; P < 0.01) in the diabetic subjects than in the nondiabetic subjects, indicating a decrease in net glucose effectiveness. [6-3H]glucose also was infused to determine whether the decrease in net glucose effectiveness was due to a decrease in the ability of glucose to stimulate its own uptake and/or to suppress its own production. Despite identical rates of tracer infusion, the increment in plasma concentration of [6-3H]glucose was higher (4.50 ± 0.29 vs. 3.16 ± 0.21 × 105 dpm/ml per 5 h; P < 0.05) in the diabetic subjects than in the nondiabetic subjects. This was due to both a decrease (P < 0.05) in the ability of glucose to stimulate its own disappearance via mass action and to a greater (P < 0.01) inhibitory effect of glucose on its own clearance. The increase in glucose concentration resulted in prompt and comparable suppression of endogenous glucose production in both groups. Under these optimized conditions, indexes of glucose effectiveness calculated with both the “cold” and “hot” minimal models also were lower (P < 0.05) in the diabetic subjects than in the nondiabetic subjects and were highly correlated (r = 0.94–0.99; P < 0.001) with the indexes of glucose effectiveness calculated from the increments above baseline of glucose and [6-3H]glucose concentration. We conclude that the ability of glucose to regulate its own metabolism in the presence of basal insulin concentrations is abnormal in people with NIDDM.

NIDDM is associated with excessive rates of endogenous glucose production in both the postabsorptive and postprandial states. To determine whether this is due to an intrinsic increase in hepatic sensitivity to glucagon, 9 NIDDM and 10 nondiabetic subjects were studied on three occasions. On each occasion, glycogen was labeled the evening before the study with subjects ingesting meals containing [6-3H]galactose. Beginning at 6:00 A.M. on the following morning, somatostatin was infused to inhibit endogenous hormone secretion. Insulin concentrations were maintained constant at basal levels (defined as that necessary to keep glucose at ∼5 mmol/l) in each individual. On one occasion, glucagon was infused at a rate of 0.65 ng ∼ kg−1 · min−1 throughout the experiment, resulting in glucagon concentrations of ∼130 pg/ml and a slow but comparable fall in endogenous glucose production with time in both groups. On the other two occasions, the glucagon infusion was increased at 10:00 A.M. to either 1.5 or 3.0 ng · kg−1 · min−1, resulting in an increase in glucagon concentrations to ∼180 and 310 pg/ml, respectively. The increment in endogenous glucose production (i.e., area above basal) did not differ in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects during either the 1.5 ng · kg−1 · min−1 (0.75 ± 0.055 vs. 0.78 ± 0.048 mmol/kg) or 3.0 ng · kg−1 · min−1 (1.06 ± 0.066 vs. 1.10 ± 0.073 mmol/kg) glucagon infusions. In contrast, the amount of [6-3H]glucose released from glycogen was lower (P < 0.05) in the diabetic than nondiabetic subjects during both glucagon infusions. The specific activity of glycogen, calculated as the integrated release of [6-3H]glucose divided by the integrated release of unlabeled glucose, was lower (P < 0.05) in diabetic subjects than in nondiabetic subjects during both the 1.5 ng · kg−1 · min−1 (19.0 ± 3.9 vs. 41.4 ± 5.7 dpmμmol) and 3.0 ng · kg−1 · min−1 (19.1 ± 3.1 vs. 36.5 ± 7.2 dpm/μmol) glucagon infusions, implying that a greater portion of the glucose released from glycogen was derived from the indirect pathway. We concluded that although NIDDM is not associated with an intrinsic alteration in hepatic sensitivity to glucagon, it does alter the relative contributions of the direct and indirect pathways to nocturnal glycogen synthesis.