Ramadan, Dina

Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a well-established treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, its role in cervical artery dissection-related (CeAD) LVO remains debated due to anatomical complexities and procedural challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of MT in patients with AIS due to CeAD-related LVO compared with other AIS etiologies. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to March 2025. Comparative observational studies evaluating the use of MT in adult patients with AIS due to LVO were included, specifically those comparing outcomes in patients with CeAD versus non-CeAD etiologies. Results MT for CeAD-related AIS showed no statistically significant difference in successful recanalization compared with non-CeAD cases (OR 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.04), P=0.10). However, patients with CeAD-related AIS had significantly higher rates of 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) (OR 2.17 (95% CI 1.55 to 3.05), P<0.01) and lower 90-day mortality (OR 0.34 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.53), P<0.01). Rates of distal embolization (OR 1.60 (95% CI 0.69 to 3.70), P=0.27), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.38), P=0.49), or iatrogenic dissection (OR 1.58 (95% CI 0.59 to 4.22), P=0.36) did not differ significantly between patient groups. Conclusions MT in patients with CeAD-related LVO is safe, effective, and associated with improved functional outcomes and lower mortality compared with patients with non-CeAD acute ischemic causes.

Background Guide catheter (GC) placement, whether distal or proximal, may influence the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, definitions of placement and procedural strategies vary across studies, limiting clarity. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to September 1, 2024. Comparative studies of adult patients with anterior circulation AIS-LVO undergoing MT that reported GC placement were included. Both balloon GCs (BGCs) and non-BGCs were eligible. Data were pooled using random-effects models in R. Outcomes included functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 90 days), successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2b or expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2c), first-pass recanalization (FPR), mortality, puncture-to-recanalization (PTR) time, and complications. Subgroup analyses were performed by thrombectomy technique and catheter type. Results Seven retrospective studies comprising 2148 patients (1042 proximal, 1106 distal) were analyzed. Distal placement was associated with higher rates of functional independence (risk ratio (RR): 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–1.42), successful reperfusion (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04–1.22), and FPR (RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.15–1.58), as well as lower 90-day mortality (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28–0.82). PTR time was shorter with distal placement (mean difference: −7.7 min, 95% CI: −10.8 to −4.6). No significant differences were observed for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.55–1.65) or emboli to new territory (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.28–2.52). Benefits were consistent across both BGCs and non-BGCs. Heterogeneity existed in outcome definitions and techniques, and publication bias could not be excluded. Conclusions Distal GC placement is associated with improved reperfusion, efficiency, and functional outcomes in MT for anterior circulation AIS-LVO, without increased complications. Given the retrospective nature of included studies, anatomic confounding, and inconsistent outcome definitions, findings should be considered preliminary. Multicenter trials are needed to confirm whether catheter position independently predicts MT outcomes.