Hasanzadeh, Alireza

Background Guide catheter (GC) placement, whether distal or proximal, may influence the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, definitions of placement and procedural strategies vary across studies, limiting clarity. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to September 1, 2024. Comparative studies of adult patients with anterior circulation AIS-LVO undergoing MT that reported GC placement were included. Both balloon GCs (BGCs) and non-BGCs were eligible. Data were pooled using random-effects models in R. Outcomes included functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 90 days), successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2b or expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2c), first-pass recanalization (FPR), mortality, puncture-to-recanalization (PTR) time, and complications. Subgroup analyses were performed by thrombectomy technique and catheter type. Results Seven retrospective studies comprising 2148 patients (1042 proximal, 1106 distal) were analyzed. Distal placement was associated with higher rates of functional independence (risk ratio (RR): 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–1.42), successful reperfusion (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04–1.22), and FPR (RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.15–1.58), as well as lower 90-day mortality (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28–0.82). PTR time was shorter with distal placement (mean difference: −7.7 min, 95% CI: −10.8 to −4.6). No significant differences were observed for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.55–1.65) or emboli to new territory (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.28–2.52). Benefits were consistent across both BGCs and non-BGCs. Heterogeneity existed in outcome definitions and techniques, and publication bias could not be excluded. Conclusions Distal GC placement is associated with improved reperfusion, efficiency, and functional outcomes in MT for anterior circulation AIS-LVO, without increased complications. Given the retrospective nature of included studies, anatomic confounding, and inconsistent outcome definitions, findings should be considered preliminary. Multicenter trials are needed to confirm whether catheter position independently predicts MT outcomes.

Background: Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is the most dreaded complication after reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to estimate and compare risks of sICH after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) depending on the location of the large vessel occlusion, concomitant use of intravenous thrombolysis, timing of treatment, and core size. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were included, following a comprehensive search of different databases from inception to 1 March 2024. Random-effect models in a meta-analysis were employed to obtain the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for sICH with MT, and were then compared to other reperfusion treatment regimens, including best medical treatment and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Results: MT in the anterior circulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH as compared with no-MT (RR: 1.46; 95%CI: 1.03–2.07; p = 0.037). The risk of sICH was comparable between the MT and MT+IVT groups (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.57–1.03; p = 0.079). There was no difference in sICH risk with MT as compared with no-MT within 6 h of last known well (RR: 1.14; 95%CI: 0.78–1.66; p = 0.485) and beyond that time (RR: 1.29; 95%CI: 0.80–2.08; p = 0.252); the risk of sICH was also comparable between MT conducted within 6 h of last known well and MT conducted beyond that time (p = 0.512). The sICH risk for MT in the posterior circulation (RR: 7.48; 95%CI: 2.27–24.61) was significantly higher than for MT in the anterior circulation (RR: 1.18; 95%CI: 0.90–1.56) (p = 0.003). MT was also associated with a significantly higher sICH risk than no-MT among patients with large core strokes (RR: 1.71; 95%CI: 1.09–2.66, p = 0.018). Conclusions: When evaluating cumulative evidence from randomized controlled trials, the risk of sICH is increased after MT compared with patients not treated with MT. Yet, the difference is largely driven by the greater risk of sICH in patients treated with MT for posterior circulation occlusions and, to a lesser degree, large core strokes. Concomitant use of intravenous thrombolysis and the use of MT in the extended therapeutic window do not raise the risk of sICH.