Khanna, Sahil

INTRODUCTION: Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) are an option for microscopic colitis (MC) refractory or intolerant to budesonide. There are inconsistent data on the prevalence of bile acid malabsorption (BAM) and utility of bile acid testing in MC. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate these outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of randomized control trials and observational studies of adults with MC treated with BAS was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus from inception to January 22, 2024. Data were extracted on (i) prevalence of BAM, (ii) clinical response and adverse events, and (iii) recurrence after BAS discontinuation. Data were pooled using random-effects models to determine weighted pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 23 studies (1 randomized control trial, 22 observational), with 1,011 patients with MC assessed for BAM and 771 treated with BAS. The pooled prevalence of BAM was 34% (95% CI 0.26–0.42, I 2 = 81%). The pooled response rate with BAS induction for all patients with MC, irrespective of BAM, was 62% (95% CI 0.55–0.70, I 2 = 71%). There was a higher pooled response rate in patients with BAM compared with those without BAM ( P < 0.0001). The pooled rate of BAS-related adverse effects was 9% (95% CI 0.05–0.14, I 2 = 58%). DISCUSSION: One-third of patients with MC had BAM, and almost two-thirds of all patients responded to BAS with limited side effects. Patients with MC and BAM were more likely to respond to therapy, supporting the value of bile acid testing.

INTRODUCTION: Despite research efforts, predicting Clostridioides difficile incidence and its outcomes remains challenging. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) models in predicting C. difficile infection (CDI) incidence and complications using clinical data from electronic health records. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of databases (OVID, Embase, MEDLINE ALL, Web of Science, and Scopus) from inception up to September 2023. Studies employing ML techniques for predicting CDI or its complications were included. The primary outcome was the type and performance of ML models assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective studies that evaluated CDI incidence and/or outcomes were included. The most commonly used ML models were random forest and gradient boosting. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.60 to 0.81 for predicting CDI incidence, 0.59 to 0.80 for recurrence, and 0.64 to 0.88 for predicting complications. Advanced ML models demonstrated similar performance to traditional logistic regression. However, there was notable heterogeneity in defining CDI and the different outcomes, including incidence, recurrence, and complications, and a lack of external validation in most studies. DISCUSSION: ML models show promise in predicting CDI incidence and outcomes. However, the observed heterogeneity in CDI definitions and the lack of real-world validation highlight challenges in clinical implementation. Future research should focus on external validation and the use of standardized definitions across studies.

Introduction Hospitalizations, proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), and systemic antibiotics increase the risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in cirrhosis. We compare the risk of CDI with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) medications, hypothesizing that rifaximin may decrease CDI risk. Materials and Methods A retrospective study of hospitalized HE patients treated with lactulose and/or rifaximin at Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona from 2008 to 2013 was conducted. Data on demographics, hospitalizations, antibiotics, and PPI use and CDI were gathered. Univariate and multivariable cox models were constructed. Results We found 1,112 hospitalizations in 1,055 unique patients (55 had 1 subsequent readmission, 1 patient had 2); 428 (40.6%) patients were women (median age: 58 years [interquartile range: 52–65]). CDI developed after 66/1,112 (5.9%) hospitalizations within 12 months post-discharge. Lactulose was administered in 21 (31.8%), rifaximin in 5 (7.6%), both in 40 (60.6%) hospitalizations. Systemic antibiotics were used in 28 (42.4%) patients and PPIs in 60 (90.9%) patients.Univariate analysis using medication (with lactulose alone as the reference group) showed rifaximin was not significantly associated with CDI compared with lactulose (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57–4.33, p = 0.39). Use of both medications was not significant compared with lactulose (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.84–2.38, p = 0.19). Results were similar after controlling for confounders. Multivariable analysis based on length of stay, age, and gender showed no differences between rifaximin versus lactulose and both versus lactulose. Conclusion There is no significant difference between lactulose and rifaximin on CDI development in HE patients. However, CDI should still be considered when managing diarrhea in HE patients.

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with frequent recurrences. The role of probiotics in preventing CDI remains unclear despite patients frequently using them. Methods We performed a systematic-review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of Saccharomyces boulardii, a yeast probiotic, in preventing primary or recurrent CDI in patients on systemic antimicrobial therapy. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to December 2021 to identify studies (case-control, cohort, or clinical trial studies) reporting the use of systemic antimicrobials with or without S. boulardii and providing information on primary or recurrent CDI. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. Results Eight studies (six randomized control trials and two cohort studies) were included. Six studies with 9,712 patients evaluated primary prevention. The rate of CDI in patients who received S. boulardii was 0.73% (44/5977) compared to 1.09% (41/3735) in the control group. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of CDI among the two groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; 95%CI, 0.46–1.10; p = 0.124) with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). In two studies with 292 patients evaluating secondary prevention, the rate of recurrent CDI was 36.73% (54/147) on S. boulardii compared to 46.20% (67/145) in controls, with no significant difference (p = 0.19). Subgroup analysis of studies using S. boulardii (250 mg twice daily) showed no difference in the CDI risk with or without S. boulardii. No serious adverse events from S. boulardii were noted. Conclusion The use of S. boulardii appears to have no benefit for preventing either primary or recurrent CDI in patients taking systemic antimicrobials.