Back to Authors

Byrne, Matthew

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-4424

Mayo Clinic

University of Rochester Medicine

Citations 3

Optimizing liver transplant outcomes for colorectal liver metastases in the United States
Chávez‐Villa, Mariana , Sasaki, Kazunari , Nakayama, Toshihiro , Byrne, Matthew , Jiménez-Soto, Cristina , Ruffolo, Luis I. , Endo, Yutaka , Dokus, M. Katherine , Bekki, Yuki , Qadan, Motaz , Tomiyama, Koji , Roberts, J.P., Byrne, Matthew M , Roberts, John P , Pomfret, Elizabeth , Wall, Anji E , Hernández-Alejandro, Roberto , Wall, Anji

Liver Transplantation | October 14, 2025 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 508-517

10.1097/lvt.0000000000000746 Get It

The TransMet trial and Norwegian studies have shown excellent outcomes in highly selected patients undergoing liver transplant (LT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM). Our aim is to provide an updated analysis of the current state of LT for uCRLM in the United States. Adult patients with a diagnosis of uCRLM listed for LT between December 2017 and March 2025 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database and analyzed. An analysis of living donor LT (LDLT) and deceased donor LT (DDLT) was performed. During this period, 222 patients were listed, and 158 received an LT across 33 centers. Of these, 76 (48.1%) underwent LDLT, and 82 patients (51.9%) underwent DDLT. Of the 82 deceased donors, 56 (68.2%) were out-of-sequence offers. Overall, the 3-year survival and disease-free survival rates were 66.7% and 44.0%, respectively. The 3-year survival for LDLT and DDLT was 74.1% and 57.3% ( p =0.04), respectively. While these results have not yet reached the acceptable threshold established for other LT indications, they have improved and are expected to continue improving after the implementation of prioritization points. Given the potential variability of oncologic selection criteria and graft quality, we call for the standardization of nationally accepted selection criteria for listing patients for LT with uCRLM and for providing early access to high-quality organs. To achieve this, it is imperative to create, update, and maintain national databases that allow for the collection of more granular oncological variables.
Live Donor Liver Transplantation for Oncologic Indications
Chávez‐Villa, Mariana , Jiménez-Soto, Cristina , Cybulski, L, Hernandez‐Alejandro, Roberto, Tomiyama, Koji , Chávez-Villa, Mariana, Byrne, Matthew , Endo, Yutaka , Cybulski, Luke, Ruffolo, Luis I.

Transplantation | June 11, 2025 | Volume: 109 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1591-1600

10.1097/tp.0000000000005427 Get It

Living donor liver transplantation for oncologic indications is a complex topic that involves transplantation, oncology, and ethical considerations. The incidence of primary and secondary malignancy of the liver is growing. As transplant oncology continues to provide promising outcomes, the patient population that may benefit from transplantation will grow. In this review, we provide evidence that justify attempting transplantation for oncologic indications through the exploration of outcomes in both deceased donor and living donor liver transplants. This will focus on outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine liver metastasis, and colorectal liver metastases. This review aims to summarize the current status of transplant oncology and to develop the considerations of living donor liver transplantation for these indications.
Recipient prioritization and graft choice in liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis
Chávez‐Villa, Mariana , Hernandez‐Alejandro, Roberto, Chávez-Villa, Mariana, Byrne, Matthew , Bekki, Yuki

Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation | April 3, 2025 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 179-185

10.1097/mot.0000000000001214 Get It

Purpose of review Liver transplantation for metastatic colorectal cancer has been shown to be efficacious in the well selected patient. In the United States, there remains controversy on the appropriate selection criteria and optimal graft type to be utilized in these patients. Our group advocates for strict recipient selection and early access to quality grafts for these recipients. Recent findings In the past two years, there has been an explosion of centers reporting outcomes after liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases. In North America, the publications have focused on single center experiences. The group in Oslo has reported their long-term outcomes of all transplanted patients. The TransMet randomized controlled trial has demonstrated efficacy of liver transplantation with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Summary Liver transplantation for metastatic colorectal cancer is an efficacious procedure for the well selected patient. Regardless of graft type, potential liver transplant recipients with liver limited unresectable colorectal liver metastases should be evaluated with a strict criterion to determine eligibility. Once eligible, patients should receive early access to high quality grafts.