Back to Authors

Bekki, Yuki

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-3277

Mayo Clinic

University of Rochester Medicine

Citations 3

Optimizing liver transplant outcomes for colorectal liver metastases in the United States
Chávez‐Villa, Mariana , Sasaki, Kazunari , Nakayama, Toshihiro , Byrne, Matthew , Jiménez-Soto, Cristina , Ruffolo, Luis I. , Endo, Yutaka , Dokus, M. Katherine , Bekki, Yuki , Qadan, Motaz , Tomiyama, Koji , Roberts, J.P., Byrne, Matthew M , Roberts, John P , Pomfret, Elizabeth , Wall, Anji E , Hernández-Alejandro, Roberto , Wall, Anji

Liver Transplantation | October 14, 2025 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 508-517

10.1097/lvt.0000000000000746 Get It

The TransMet trial and Norwegian studies have shown excellent outcomes in highly selected patients undergoing liver transplant (LT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM). Our aim is to provide an updated analysis of the current state of LT for uCRLM in the United States. Adult patients with a diagnosis of uCRLM listed for LT between December 2017 and March 2025 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database and analyzed. An analysis of living donor LT (LDLT) and deceased donor LT (DDLT) was performed. During this period, 222 patients were listed, and 158 received an LT across 33 centers. Of these, 76 (48.1%) underwent LDLT, and 82 patients (51.9%) underwent DDLT. Of the 82 deceased donors, 56 (68.2%) were out-of-sequence offers. Overall, the 3-year survival and disease-free survival rates were 66.7% and 44.0%, respectively. The 3-year survival for LDLT and DDLT was 74.1% and 57.3% ( p =0.04), respectively. While these results have not yet reached the acceptable threshold established for other LT indications, they have improved and are expected to continue improving after the implementation of prioritization points. Given the potential variability of oncologic selection criteria and graft quality, we call for the standardization of nationally accepted selection criteria for listing patients for LT with uCRLM and for providing early access to high-quality organs. To achieve this, it is imperative to create, update, and maintain national databases that allow for the collection of more granular oncological variables.
Recipient prioritization and graft choice in liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis
Chávez‐Villa, Mariana , Hernandez‐Alejandro, Roberto, Chávez-Villa, Mariana, Byrne, Matthew , Bekki, Yuki

Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation | April 3, 2025 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 179-185

10.1097/mot.0000000000001214 Get It

Purpose of review Liver transplantation for metastatic colorectal cancer has been shown to be efficacious in the well selected patient. In the United States, there remains controversy on the appropriate selection criteria and optimal graft type to be utilized in these patients. Our group advocates for strict recipient selection and early access to quality grafts for these recipients. Recent findings In the past two years, there has been an explosion of centers reporting outcomes after liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases. In North America, the publications have focused on single center experiences. The group in Oslo has reported their long-term outcomes of all transplanted patients. The TransMet randomized controlled trial has demonstrated efficacy of liver transplantation with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Summary Liver transplantation for metastatic colorectal cancer is an efficacious procedure for the well selected patient. Regardless of graft type, potential liver transplant recipients with liver limited unresectable colorectal liver metastases should be evaluated with a strict criterion to determine eligibility. Once eligible, patients should receive early access to high quality grafts.
Normothermic Regional Perfusion Can Improve Both Utilization and Outcomes in DCD Liver, Kidney, and Pancreas Transplantation
Myers, Bryan D., Sasaki, Kazunari , Tomiyama, Koji , Bekki, Yuki , Croome, Kristopher P. , Myers, Bryan

Transplantation Direct | February 20, 2023 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 3 | Pages: e1450

10.1097/txd.0000000000001450 Get It

Background. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) has gained widespread adoption in multiple European countries. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of thoracoabdominal-NRP (TA-NRP) on the utilization and outcomes of liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation in the United States. Methods. Using the US national registry data between 2020 and 2021, donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors were separated into 2 groups: DCD with TA-NRP and without TA-NRP. There were 5234 DCD donors; among them 34 donors were with TA-NRP. After 1:4 propensity score matching, the utilization rates were compared between DCD with and without TA-NRP. Results. Although the utilization rates of kidney and pancreas were comparable ( P = 0.71 and P = 0.06, 94.1% versus 95.6% and 8.8% versus 2.2%, respectively), that of liver in DCD with TA-NRP was significantly higher ( P < 0.001; 70.6% versus 39.0%). Among 24 liver transplantations, 62 kidney transplantations, and 3 pancreas transplantations from DCD with TA-NRP, there were 2 liver grafts and 1 kidney graft that failed within 1 y after transplantation. Conclusions. TA-NRP in the United States significantly increased the utilization rate of abdominal organs from DCD donors with comparable outcomes after transplantation. Increasing use of NRP may expand the donor pool without compromising transplant outcomes.