Back to Authors

Peng, Kah-Whye

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9815-7721

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 57

Phase I Trial of Systemic Administration of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Genetically Engineered to Express NIS and Human Interferon Beta, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM), Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), and T-Cell Neoplasms (TCL)
Peng, Kah-Whye , Ginos, Brenda, Giers, Marissa, Brunton, Beth, Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Hayman, Suzanne R. , Lust, John A., Warsame, Rahma , Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Kapoor, Prashant , Kyle, Robert A. , Fonder, Amie , Hobbs, Miriam, Hwa, Yi L. , Kumar, Shaji , Lacy, Martha Q. , Cook, Joselle , Dueck, Amylou C. , Packiriswamy, Nandakumar , Witzig, Thomas E. , Buadi, Francis K. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Gertz, Morie A. , Go, Ronald S. , Dingli, David , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Leung, Nelson , Gonsalves, Wilson I. , Muchtar, Eli , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Broski, Stephen M. , Siddiqui, Mustaqeem , Lin, Yi

Blood | November 4, 2020 | Volume: 136 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 7-8

10.1182/blood-2020-140853 Get It

Background: Oncolytic virotherapy is a novel immunomodulatory therapeutic approach for relapsed refractory hematologic malignancies. The Indiana strain of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) has been engineered to encode interferon beta (IFNβ) and sodium iodine symporter (NIS) to produce VSV-IFNβ-NIS. The virally encoded IFNβ serves as an index of viral proliferation and enhances host anti-tumor immunity. The NIS is inserted as a reporter gene into the viral genome to enable noninvasive monitoring of viral spread using PET/CT imaging. Here we present results of Arm A (patients with low tumor burden) of the Phase I clinical trial (NCT03017820) of intravenous administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS for patients (pts) with relapsed refractory hematological malignancies: MM, AML, and TCL. Methods: This was a classical 3+3 phase I trial, starting at 5x10^9 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose) level 1 through 1.7x10^11 TCID50 dose level 4 given as a single IV dose. The primary objective was determining the maximum tolerated dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS alone; secondary objectives include estimating the safety profile and preliminary efficacy. Correlative objectives include monitoring the pharmacodynamics of viral replication through SPECT/CT imaging with NIS gene, viremia, virus shedding and changes in the immune profile of peripheral blood leukocytes. Adverse events (AEs) are reported based on CTCAE v4; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading was based on Lee (Blood 2014; 124(2):188-195) criteria. Results: From April 2017, 12 pts have received IV VSV-IFNβ-NIS in Arm A: MM (7), TCL(4) and AML(1); 3 pts were treated at each dose level (DL) 1 to 4. At DL1, there were five grade 3 hematologic AEs (leukopenia [1], neutropenia [1], lymphopenia [3]) and no grade 3+ non-hematologic AEs. At DL2, three grade 3 hematologic AEs (anemia [2], lymphopenia [1]), four grade 4 hematologic AEs (neutropenia [1], leukopenia [1], lymphopenia [1] and thrombocytopenia [1]). There was 1 event of grade 2 CRS at DL2, two grade 3 non-hematologic AEs (nausea [1], dehydration [1]). At DL3, there was one grade 4 hematologic AE (neutropenia [1]), three grade 3 hematologic AEs (lymphopenia [2], leukopenia [1]), and one grade 3 non-hematologic AE (vasovagal reaction [1]). One grade 2 and grade 1 CRS by Lee criteria were observed. At DL4, there were three grade 3 hematologic AEs (lymphopenia [1], neutropenia [1], thrombocytopenia [1]), and three grade 3 non-hematologic AEs (AST increase [1], skin infection [1], soft tissue infection [1])and two grade 2 CRS. There were no dose limiting toxicities. There was one partial response (DL2) and one complete response (DL4); 3 pts had stable disease, 7 pts progressed. The MM pts receiving VSV-IFNβ-NIS at DL4 had stable disease. Six of the 7 MM pts demonstrated transient reduction in serum level of involved free light chain (LC) after VSV-IFNβ-NIS infusion, with median 20.4% reduction of the involved LC within 48 hrs. Viremia was detectable in all pts at the end of infusion, to varying levels at 30 mins, 1, 2, 4, 24, 48h or 72 hrs post infusion. No persistent viremia was observed. No infectious virus was recovered in buccal swabs or urine and neutralizing anti-VSV antibodies were present by day 29. The IFN levels were detectable within 30 minutes of infusion and peaked between 4 and 48 hrs. The pts with a diagnosis of TCL mounted higher hIFNβ levels within 48 hrs. Remarkably, the TCL pt with CR (DL4) mounted a peak hIFNβ response of 18213.3pg/ml at 48 hrs post infusion, approximately 15-fold higher than any other pt enrolled in the study; and highest neutralizing antibody titer (1:40960). Conclusion: VSV-IFNβ-NIS can be safely administered by intravenous infusion in pts with hematological malignancies, up to a dose level of 1.7 x 1011 TCID50, without dose limiting toxicities and no CRS higher than grade 2. In this small phase 1 study, pts with T-cell lymphoma demonstrated the strongest signal of response, with one confirmed partial response at DL2 and one complete response at DL4. IFNβ is an early biomarker of tumor susceptibility; the magnitude of IFNβ elevation appears to correlate with treatment response. There were no confirmed responses in pts with MM, but the 20.4% transient reduction in LC suggests that combination strategies with VSV-IFNβ-NIS may result in deeper and sustained responses in MM. Future trials investigating combination strategies with immune modulatory drugs are being planned. Disclosures Peng: Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. Witzig:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; MorphSys: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Intellia: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:Celgene: Consultancy; Annexon: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Appellis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Data Safety Monitoring board from Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI SPORE MM: Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Amyloidosis Foundation: Research Funding; Advisory Board for Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Consultancy; Ionis/Akcea: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; i3Health: Consultancy; Advisory Board for Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; International Waldenstrom Foundation: Research Funding. Dingli:Rigel: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy. Kapoor:Cellectar: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Lin:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vineti: Consultancy. Kumar:Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Cellectar: Other; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Sanofi: Research Funding; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; MedImmune: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding. Russell:Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: This describes of administration of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Genetically Engineered to Express NIS and human interferon, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic malignacies
Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) Engineered to Express CD19 Stimulates Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Modified T Cells and Promotes Their Anti-Tumor Effects
Eckert, Elizabeth C., Crotts, Sydney B. , Pham, Linh , Tapper, Erin E. , Schick, Kendall J. , Fonkoua, Lionel Aurelien Kankeu , Horvei, Paulina , Ruff, Michael W. , Peng, Kah-Whye , Sakemura, Reona , Siegler, Elizabeth L. , Cox, Michelle J. , Hefazi, Mehrdad , Roman, Claudia Manriquez , Can, İsmail , Bezerra, Evandro D. , Slager, Susan L. , Parikh, Sameer A. , Kay, Neil E. , Kenderian, Saad S.

Blood | November 4, 2020 | Volume: 136 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 30-31

10.1182/blood-2020-139647 Get It

Although CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy is highly effective and was FDA approved for certain B-cell malignancies, most patients relapse after CART infusion within the first 1-2 years due to inadequate CART expansion in vivo. Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has the ability to infect and lyse cancer cells. Clinical trials of VSV oncolytic therapy indicate that VSV efficiently infects cancer cells as well as innate immune cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that in patients who achieve suboptimal response to CART19, VSV engineered to express CD19 will augment anti-tumor activity through 1) direct lysis of cancer cells and 2) infecting cancer cells and innate immune cells with CD19 to further stimulate CART19. To test our hypothesis, human CD19 or GFP (control) was engineered between the glycoprotein and large-protein (Fig.1A) in a modified VSV backbone. A matrix inactivating mutation (M51R) rendered it incapable of suppressing anti-viral reactions of infected targets, potentially promoting its immunogenicity. First, we tested the anti-tumor activity of VSV-CD19 and VSV-GFP against the luciferase (luc)+CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line NALM6 and the luc+CD19- acute myeloid leukemia cell line MOLM13. VSV-CD19 and VSV-GFP successfully lysed NALM6 (Fig.1B) or MOLM13, both in vitro and in vivo (data not shown). Next, we investigated the efficiency of VSV-CD19 in infecting tumor and immune cells. 24 hours after exposure to VSV-CD19 or VSV-GFP, we analyzed the surface expression of CD19 on MOLM13 and revealed efficient CD19 delivery (Fig.1C). Next, we assessed VSV infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors (HDs). Freshly isolated HD PBMCs were infected with VSV-CD19 for 6 hours and subsequently assessed for CD19 expression. Consistent with findings from clinical trials, VSV-CD19 selectively infected and induced CD19 expression on monocytes while other cells were not affected (Fig.1D). To exclude potential toxicities against CART19, we co-cultured CART19 with VSV-CD19 or VSV-GFP using second-generation 4-1BB costimulated CART19. Both VSV-CD19 and VSV-GFP did not infect CART19 as evident by preservation of CART19 viability and lack of CD19 or GFP expression (Fig.1E). Having demonstrated that VSV-CD19 specifically delivered CD19 to monocytes, we next tested whether the infected monocytes stimulated CART19. VSV-CD19 infected monocytes induced potent antigen-specific proliferation of CART19 (Fig.1F) and resulted in enhanced anti-tumor activity against luc+NALM6 in vitro (Fig.1G). Next, we aimed to confirm these findings in vivo. We generated luc+CART19 to track CART19 expansion in vivo. Freshly isolated HD monocytes were infected with VSV-CD19 ex vivo. After 4 hours, VSV-CD19 was washed away and immunocompromised NSG mice were intravenously injected with VSV-CD19 infectedmonocytes. After 24 hours, 3.5x106 of luc+untransduced T cells (UTD) or luc+CART19 were injected intravenously. The T cell expansion was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI). VSV-CD19 infected monocytes specifically stimulated and expanded CART19 (Fig.1H). Finally, we tested whether VSV-CD19 can stimulate and rescue suboptimal anti-tumor effects of CART19 in vivo using a NALM6 relapsed model. Here, 1x106 luc+NALM6 were injected intravenously into NSG mice on day -6. At day -1, mice were imaged and randomized according to tumor burden to receive 1x106 UTD or CART19 on day 0. Subsequently, at day 4, mice were re-imaged and randomized. At day 5, HD monocytes were injected intravenously. Three hours after administering monocytes, mice received 1x107 VSV-CD19 or VSV-GFP (Fig.1I). BLI revealed that CART19 plusVSV-CD19 showed better tumor control than CART19 monotherapy or CART19 plus VSV-GFP (Fig.1J-K). Furthermore, CART19 plus VSV-CD19 exhibited long-term survival (Fig.1L). In summary, VSV-CD19 not only demonstrated direct anti-tumor effects but also specifically delivered CD19 to monocytes and tumor cells, thereby re-stimulating and enhancing the anti-tumor activity of CART19. This work provides a rationale to study VSV-CD19 in patients who demonstrate only suboptimal response to CART19. This approach could also be applied to augment CART therapy in other tumors. Figure 1 Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Eckert:Genentech: Current Employment. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh:Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding. Peng:Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. Russell:Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. Kenderian:Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding.
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated introduction of the sodium/iodide symporter gene enables noninvasive in vivo tracking of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes
Ostrominski, John W. , Yada, Ravi Chandra , Sato, Noriko , Klein, Michael G. , Blinova, Ksenia , Valadez, Racquel, Palisoc, Maryknoll, Peng, Kah-Whye , San, Hong, Lin, Yongshun, Basuli, Falguni , Swenson, Rolf E. , Haigney, Mark C. , Boehm, Manfred , Hong, So Gun , Hong, So Gun , Dunbar, Cynthia E , Patel, Dakshesh , Pittaluga, Stefania , Zhang, Xiang , Choyke, Peter L. , Zou, Jizhong

Stem Cells Translational Medicine | July 23, 2020 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1203-1217

10.1002/sctm.20-0019 Get It

Abstract Techniques that enable longitudinal tracking of cell fate after myocardial delivery are imperative for optimizing the efficacy of cell-based cardiac therapies. However, these approaches have been underutilized in preclinical models and clinical trials, and there is considerable demand for site-specific strategies achieving long-term expression of reporter genes compatible with safe noninvasive imaging. In this study, the rhesus sodium/iodide symporter (NIS) gene was incorporated into rhesus macaque induced pluripotent stem cells (RhiPSCs) via CRISPR/Cas9. Cardiomyocytes derived from NIS-RhiPSCs (NIS-RhiPSC-CMs) exhibited overall similar morphological and electrophysiological characteristics compared to parental control RhiPSC-CMs at baseline and with exposure to physiological levels of sodium iodide. Mice were injected intramyocardially with 2 million NIS-RhiPSC-CMs immediately following myocardial infarction, and serial positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed with 18F-tetrafluoroborate to monitor transplanted cells in vivo. NIS-RhiPSC-CMs could be detected until study conclusion at 8 to 10 weeks postinjection. This NIS-based molecular imaging platform, with optimal safety and sensitivity characteristics, is primed for translation into large-animal preclinical models and clinical trials.
Interaction of Measles Virus Vectors with Auger Electron Emitting Radioisotopes.
Peng, Kah-Whye , Harvey, Mary, Bergert, Elizabeth R., Kyle, Robert A. , Cattaneo, Roberto , Morris, John C., Dingli, David , Vongpunsawad, Sompong

Blood | April 19, 2020 | Volume: 106 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 5525-5525

10.1182/blood.v106.11.5525.5525 Get It

Abstract Background: Viral vectors based on the Edmonston strain of measles virus (MV-Edm) selectively destroy all tumor cell lines tested in vitro. The oncolytic activity of the virus is enhanced by expression of the thyroidal sodium iodide symporter (MV-NIS) that allows selective 131I uptake by infected tumor cells and eliminates myeloma tumor xenografts that are resistant to the parent virus. MV-NIS is being considered for therapy of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Advanced myeloma is associated with significant immunosuppression with the potential risk of uncontrolled virus proliferation. The number of agents with activity against MV is limited. Low energy (Auger) electrons have a short path length and selectively damage cells in which the isotope decays. Thus, we hypothesized that the Auger electron emitting isotope 125I, selectively taken up by cells expressing NIS, can be used to control viral proliferation. Methods: A replication competent MV that expressed both a soluble form of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and NIS (MV-NICE) was rescued and characterized. Cells were infected with MV-NICE or control vectors and exposed to 125I with appropriate controls. CEA expression and viral titers were determined at different time points. The role of free radical generation on virus replication was explored. In vivo control of MV-NICE replication with 125I was attempted. Results: MV-NICE replication in vitro is inhibited by the selective uptake of 125I by cells expressing NIS. Extracellular decay of the isotope has no effect on virus proliferation. Auger electron damage is in part mediated by free radicals and abrogated by glutathione. In myeloma xenografts, control of MV-NICE with 125I was not possible under the conditions of the experiment. Conclusion: MV-NICE does not replicate faster in the presence of radiation under our experimental conditions. Auger electron emitting isotopes effectively stop propagation of MV vectors expressing NIS in vitro. Additional work is necessary to translate these observations in vivo.
Oncolytic Measles Virus Selectively Targets CD46 Overexpression on Myeloma Cells.
Peng, Kah-Whye , Timm, Michael, Greipp, Philip R., Dingli, David , Dispenzieri, Angela , Gertz, Morie A. , Witzig, Thomas E.

Blood | April 18, 2020 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2392-2392

10.1182/blood.v104.11.2392.2392 Get It

Abstract Multiple myeloma remains incurable and novel therapeutics are urgently needed. We have shown that live attenuated Edmonston strain measles virus (MV-Edm) is potently oncolytic in multiple myeloma xenograft models and can efficiently infect CD138 sorted primary myeloma cells inducing extensive intercellular fusion which leads to cell death (Blood, 2001, v98, p2002). In contrast, the virus causes minimal damage to normal PHA-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes, fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. To facilitate non-invasive imaging of sites of viral gene expression, we introduced the human thyroidal sodium iodide symporter (NIS) gene into the viral genome (MV-NIS). MV-NIS infected myeloma cells efficiently concentrate radioiodine which provides a basis for noninvasive imaging and destruction of infected tumors using beta emitters such as 131I (Blood, 2004, v103, p1641). Clinical translation of MV-NIS in patients with refractory myeloma is planned. However, the mechanism underlying the tumor selectivity of MV-Edm has not previously been defined. MV-Edm uses either of two cellular receptors for cell entry and cell fusion; CD46, a regulator of complement activation, is expressed on all nucleated cells, wheras SLAM (signaling lymphocyte activation molecule) is expressed only on activated B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, and monocytes, and is not present on myeloma plasma cells. Using a panel of CHO cell transfectants, we demonstrated that MV-Edm -mediated cell killing increases exponentially above a threshold CD46 receptor density (Can Res, 2004, v64, p4919). We subsequently obtained bone marrow aspirates from 18 myeloma patients and performed multi-parameter flow cytometry to determine the relative expression levels of CD46 on the myeloma plasma cells versus the rest of the hematopoietic cells in the bone marrow. The myeloma cells expressed significantly higher levels (5-fold) of CD46 receptors (MFI=294.9 + 204.4, means ± SD) on their cell surfaces compared to hematopoietic cells of the erythroid, myeloid and lymphoid lineages (MFI=58.6 ± 9.0). Analysis of the myeloma array data generated by the Shaughnessy lab indicated that, in comparison to plasma cells from healthy volunteers (2997 ± 1053, n=30, means ± SD), primary myeloma cells express 2-fold elevated levels of CD46 mRNA (6592 ± 4029, n=72, p=0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Taken together, these findings provide strong support for the hypothesis that selective destruction of myeloma cells by oncolytic measles viruses is a direct consequence of their overexpression of the cellular receptor CD46.
Phase I trial of intraperitoneal (IP) administration of a measles virus (MV) derivative expressing the human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in ovarian cancer patients
Hartmann, Lynn C. , Cliby, William A. , Zollman, Paula J., Peethambaram, Prema P. , Long, Harry J., Kaur, Judith S. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Peng, Kah-Whye , Galanis, Evanthia

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 5028-5028

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.5028 Get It

5028 Background: Edmonston vaccine strains of MV have significant antitumor activity against ovarian cancer xenografts (Peng et al, Cancer Res, 2002). Oncolytic selectivity is due to overexpression of the MV CD46 receptor in ovarian cancer cells. Furthermore, engineering the virus to express the marker peptide CEA (MV-CEA) allows real time monitoring of viral gene expression/propagation in vivo. Methods: We are conducting a Phase I trial of MV-CEA in patients (pts) with recurrent, taxol and platinum refractory, ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Eligible pts should have protective anti-MV antibody (ab) titers and normal CEA levels. A standard phase I cohorts of three statistical design is employed. MV-CEA is administered IP via a port-a-cath, q 4 wks for up to 6 cycles. Results: To date, 12 pts have received viral doses from 103 to 106 TCID50. No dose-limiting toxicity has been observed. Most common toxicities included grade 1–2 nausea (4 pts); grade 1–2 fatigue (4 pts); grade 1 fever (3 pts); grade 1 abdominal pain (2 pts). One pt had grade 2–3 arthralgias in cycles 4–6. There was no treatment induced immunosuppression as assessed by DTH, CD4, CD8, immunoglobulin and complement levels, no significant increase in the titers of anti-MV abs in serum or ascites in response to treatment, and no development of anti-CEA abs. Viral genomes were detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 2 asymptomatic pts by QRT-PCR. No CEA elevation in the serum was observed in the dose range tested, and there was no viral shedding in urine or mouth gargle specimens. Testing of pt tumor samples for CD46 by IHC demonstrated overexpression of the target receptor in 7/8 pts. Best objective response was stable disease (2 - 9 mo duration) in 5 pts, while 3 pts had significant decrease in CA125 levels, of 44%, 72%, and 78%, respectively. Conclusions: In this first human application of an engineered oncolytic MV strain, we have observed excellent tolerance after repeat IP administration of the virus. Despite the low doses employed so far, there is early evidence of biologic activity. Dose escalation continues to the target dose of 109 TCID50. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Mapping of Ion and Substrate Binding Sites in Human Sodium Iodide Symporter (hNIS)
Zhekova, Hristina R. , Sakuma, Toshie, Johnson, Ryan, Concilio, Susanna C. , Lech, Patrycja, Zdravkovic, Igor, Damergi, Mirna, Suksanpaisan, Lukkana , Peng, Kah-Whye , Russell, Stephen J. , Noskov, Sergei , Russell, Stephen J , Johnson, Ryan

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling | March 5, 2020 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1652-1665

10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01114 Get It

Development of a Sensitive and Efficient Reporter Platform for the Detection of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Expansion, Trafficking, and Toxicity
Suksanpaisan, Lukkana , Khadka, Roman H., Newsom, Alysha N., Hansen, Michael J. , Schick, Kendall J. , Tapper, Erin E. , Moreno, Paulina Roman, Ruff, Michael W. , Peng, Kah-Whye , Sakemura, Reona , Cox, Michelle J. , Hefazi, Mehrdad , Roman, Claudia Manriquez , Parikh, Sameer A. , Kay, Neil E. , Kenderian, Saad S.

Blood | February 14, 2020 | Volume: 134 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: 53-53

10.1182/blood-2019-123476 Get It

Despite the success of chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy, it is limited by 1) lower rates of durable responses related to inadequate CART cell expansion and trafficking to tumor sites and 2) development of life-threatening complication such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Development of a strategy to efficiently and robustly image and track CART cells in the clinic would allow the in vivo characterization of T cell expansion and trafficking to tumor sites as well as the development of strategies to potentially overcome these limitations. The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) is a characterized and sensitive reporter system that has been used for cell imaging in the clinic. We hypothesized that the incorporation of NIS into CART cells would be a sensitive and efficient way to assess CART cell expansion, trafficking, and toxicity. To test our hypothesis, we used two CART cell constructs that are characterized in preclinical models and studied extensively in the clinic: CART19 (41BB costimulated) and BCMA-CART cells (41BB costimulated). First, we generated NIS+CART19 and NIS+BCMA-CART cells through dual transduction of lentiviral vectors (Fig A) and revealed the exclusive 125I uptake by these NIS+CARTs and its inhibition by the NIS inhibitor KClO4in vitro (Fig B). We then analyzed T cell functions of NIS+CART cells. Here, NIS+CART19 or CART19 cells were cultured with the CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell line NALM6. There was no difference in CART cell cytotoxicity (Fig C), proliferation, or cytokine production (not shown) between NIS+CART19 and CART19. This indicates that the incorporation of NIS into CART cells does not impair their antitumor activity. Next, we evaluated the sensitivity of NIS+CART19 cell detection by TFB-PET in vivo; imaging was performed using an Inveon TFB-PET/CT scanner. Mice received 250 μCi 18F-TFB 45 minutes prior to image acquisition. NIS+CART cells were detectable with TFB-PET when cells were subcutaneously injected at a dose of 1.25x106 cells (Fig D). Having demonstrated that the incorporation of NIS in CART cells provides a sensitive way of their detection by TFB-PET and does not interfere with their effector functions, we tested its efficiency to assess CART cell trafficking in vivo, using multiple myeloma (MM) xenografts. Here, immunocompromised NOD-SCID-ɣ-/- (NSG) mice were engrafted with the BCMA+OPM2 MM cell line (1x106 IV). After engraftment, the tumor burden was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and mice were randomized to receive 1) BCMA-CART or 2) NIS+BCMA-CART cells (5x106 IV). Mice were then serially imaged for 1) bioluminescence as a measure of disease burden, and 2) with TFB-PET to assess CART cell expansion and trafficking. As expected, BLI demonstrated that MM predominantly engrafts in bones (Fig E). TFB-PET confirmed trafficking of the NIS+BCMA-CART cells to the bones, corresponding to the areas involved by MM based on BLI (Fig E, right). Both BCMA-CART and NIS+BCMA-CART cells exhibited similarly potent antitumor activity in this model (not shown). Finally, we aimed to explore whether TFB-PET can detect CART massive expansion in vivo and predict the development of CRS. Here, we used an established CRS model in our laboratory. NSG mice were engrafted with patient derived relapsed ALL blasts (5x106 IV). Engraftment was confirmed by peripheral blood sampling. When the leukemic burden is >10 CD19+ cell/µl, mice were treated with either high dose NIS+CART19 cells (5x106 IV) or PBS control. One week after NIS+CART19 cell treatment, mice developed muscle weakness, hunched bodies, and weight loss (Fig F), which correlate with an extreme elevation of cytokines (Sterner et al. Blood 2018). TFB-PET revealed a significant uptake in the bone marrow, spleen, liver, and lungs (Fig G) of the diseased mice but not control mice. Mice were then euthanized, and tissues were harvested. Flow cytometric analysis confirmed an extensive infiltration of CART cells in the liver and spleen. This demonstrates the ability of TFB-PET to detect NIS+CART cell expansion in vivo, correlating with the development of CRS. In summary, our results robustly show that the incorporation of NIS into CART cells provides a sensitive, clinically applicable platform to image CART cells using TFB-PET and to assess their expansion, trafficking to tumor sites, and the development of CRS. These studies illuminate a novel way to noninvasively assess CART cell functions in vivo. Figure Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Suksanpaisan:Imanis: Employment. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh:Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria. Kay:Agios: Other: DSMB; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Peng:Imanis: Equity Ownership. Russell:Imanis: Equity Ownership. Kenderian:Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.
Systemic Safety of a Recombinant AAV8 Vector for Human Cocaine Hydrolase Gene Therapy: A Good Laboratory Practice Preclinical Study in Mice
Chen, Vicky Ping , Gao, Yang , Geng, Liyi, Steele, Mike, Jenks, Nathan, Peng, Kah-Whye , Brimijoin, Stephen , Jenks, Nathan J.

Human Gene Therapy | October 25, 2019 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1-2 | Pages: 70-79

10.1089/hum.2019.233 Get It

Phase I Trial of Systemic Administration of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Genetically Engineered to Express NIS and Human Interferon, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM), Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), and T-Cell Neoplasms (TCL)
Lacy, Martha Q. , Peng, Kah-Whye , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Ginos, Brenda, Hayman, Suzanne R. , Lust, John A., Warsame, Rahma , Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Muchtar, Eli , Kapoor, Prashant , Kyle, Robert A. , Zeldenrust, Steven R., Al‐Kali, Aref , Litzow, Mark R. , Kumar, Shaji , Muchtar, E , Dueck, Amylou C. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Buadi, Francis K. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Gertz, Morie A. , Go, Ronald S. , Dingli, David , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Leung, Nelson , Gonsalves, Wilson I. , Broski, Stephen M. , Murphy, Robert C. , Naik, Shruthi , Federspiel, Mark J.

Blood | October 14, 2019 | Volume: 132 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 3268-3268

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119444 Get It

Abstract Background: We previously reported successful treatment of myeloma with an oncolytic virus, MMV-NIS. Preexisting immunity against measles made use of that virus unsatisfactory. The Indiana strain of Vesicular Stomatitis Viruses (VSV) are being developed as anticancer drugs for the treatment of a variety of malignancies. To ensure tumor selective replication and spread, we designed the VSV to encode interferon beta. Expression of IFNβ also serves as a STING agonist to activate host immunity against the cancer. The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) is inserted as a reporter gene into the viral genome to enable noninvasive monitoring of viral spread using PET/CT imaging. We report a Phase I clinical trial of intravenous administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS for relapsed hematological malignancies including MM, AML, and TCL. Methods: Arm A consisted of patients with low tumor burden. Arm B included patients with high tumor burden. Both arms consisted of a classical 3+3 phase I trial, starting at 5x10^9 TCID50 (dose level 1) through 5x10^11 TCID50 (dose level 4), given as a single IV dose. In order to obviate potential toxicity from high interferon levels, Arm B received ruxolitinib 15 mg twice daily for 10 days beginning on day -1. The primary objective was determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VSV-IFNβ-NIS alone and in combination with ruxolitinib; secondary objectives include estimating the safety profile and preliminary efficacy. Correlative objectives include monitoring the pharmacodynamics of viral replication through SPECT/CT imaging with NIS gene, viremia, virus shedding, changes in the immune profile of peripheral blood leukocytes, and immunohistochemistry for immune cell infiltrates in tumors. Adverse events (AEs) are reported herein based on CTCAE v4 with the exception of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) which is based on Lee (Blood 2014; 124(2):188-195) criteria. Results: To date, 10 patients have received IV VSV-IFNβ-NIS; 8 in Arm A and 2 in Arm B. In Arm A, 3 patients were treated at dose level 1, 3 at dose level 2 and 2 at dose level 3. At dose level 1, there were three grade 3 hematologic AEs (neutropenia [1], lymphopenia [2]), and no grade 3+ non-hematologic AEs. At dose level 2, there were two grade 3 hematologic AEs (anemia [1], lymphopenia [1]), and two grade 3 non-hematologic AEs (nausea [1], dehydration [1]). A grade 2 CRS by Lee criteria was also observed. At dose level 3, 2 patients have been enrolled and data are maturing for DLT evaluation. In Arm B (VSV + rux), 2 patients have been enrolled and data are maturing for dose limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation. Other grade 1 and 2 toxicities have included fever, hypertension, headache, electrolyte abnormalities, nausea, vomiting, transient elevation of liver function tests and creatinine. All grade 1 and 2 toxicities resolved within 72 hours. Among the 6 patients evaluable for response, there was one partial remission (TCL patient treated at dose level 2), and 5 with progressive disease. Multiple cytokines increased at 4h post infusion of virus, but most returned to baseline levels by 24h.Viremia was detectable in all patients at the end of infusion, and to varying levels at 30 mins, 1, 2, 4, 24, 48h or 72 hours post virus infusion. No persistent viremia was observed. No infectious virus was recovered in buccal swabs or urine and neutralizing anti-VSV antibodies were present by day 29. Extensive immune phenotyping and ELIspot assays for shared antigens are ongoing. Conclusion: In the lowest dose levels tested to date, VSV-IFNβ-NIS has not led to any observed dose limiting toxicity. Dose escalation is ongoing and updated results will be reported. Disclosures Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Peng:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Russell:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Dueck:Bayer: Employment; Phytogine: Employment; Pfizer: Honoraria. Witzig:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Gertz:spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Ionis: Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; annexon: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Alnylam: Honoraria. Dingli:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Al-Kali:Novartis: Research Funding. Naik:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Kumar:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.