Edgar, Mark A.

AbstractTemporal bone en plaque meningiomas can present management challenges, particularly when accompanied by severe pain. We report the case of a 42-year-old woman who was initially diagnosed with chronic otitis media but was later found to have a painful left temporal bone en plaque meningioma. Despite conservative therapy, her pain progressed, prompting the decision to undergo surgical resection, which resulted in considerable pain relief. This report illustrates the influence of pain on surgical decision-making for temporal bone en plaque meningiomas and reviews the literature on their variable presentations and management strategies.

Background Spinal subdural empyema rarely involves the spinal cord and may result in devastating neurological deficits. These lesions typically require prompt diagnosis, surgical evacuation, and antibiotic therapy. Here, we present the clinical course, imaging, and narrated operative video of a thoracic spinal subdural empyema initially diagnosed as an intramedullary neoplasm. Case Description A 73-year-old female presented with a 6-month history of worsening thoracic myelopathy; over the last few weeks, she rapidly developed paraplegia. She was initially diagnosed with an enlarging thoracic intramedullary mass. A spinal biopsy was performed for the presumptive diagnosis of primary intramedullary central nervous system lymphoma. However, at surgery, the thoracic lesion proved to be a chronic subdural empyema (i.e., surrounded by arachnoid granulations and soft-purulent tissue). Interestingly, the operative specimen failed to grow any specific organism. Conclusion Spinal subdural empyema should be one of the differential diagnoses considered for patients presenting with intradural spinal cord lesions.

A 74-year-old male presented with rectal pain; workup uncovered an anal mass, and a diagnosis of melanoma was rendered via histologic examination and immunohistochemical (IHC) studies. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)–based BRAF testing was performed and revealed the presence of BRAF V600E, which is a common targetable genetic alteration in melanoma. Interestingly, the ratio of mutant to wild-type copy number was low (0.3%), whereas tumor cell percentage on tissue slides was 90%. With additional workup, BRAF V600E IHC confirmed a very small subset of BRAF V600E–positive cells, and a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel revealed a pathogenic KIT variant, p.L576P, with an allele frequency of 63%. It was initially hypothesized that the main driver of the melanoma was the KIT alteration, whereas a small subclone (not detected by NGS, which has a 5% limit of detection) was driven by the BRAF V600E detected by ddPCR. To determine whether there were morphologic differences between the 2 clones, a careful review of the histology was performed and revealed distinct morphology of the BRAF V600E–positive cells, including pale cytoplasm, nuclear grooves, and infiltrating eosinophils. Additional IHC workup of the BRAF V600E–positive cells showed coexpression of CD1a, Langerin, and S100, diagnostic of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). This diagnosis was unexpected and would have been missed without highly sensitive molecular testing; yet it is of clinical importance for the patient. This case raises interesting biology questions regarding the relationship between melanoma and LCH; moreover, it highlights the importance of integrating quantitative information in molecular data interpretation.