Paradkar, Ria

Background/Objectives: Traditional fusion leads to a loss of spine mobility across the fused vertebrae. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) was developed with the goal of increasing flexibility and maintaining some spinal mobility. However, it is not known if the additional mobility leads to significant functional improvement. This prospective motion analysis study evaluates functional outcomes, specifically gait stability, in pre-operative, post-fusion, and post-VBT patients by using postural perturbations on a treadmill. Methods: Overall, 79 subjects underwent a computer-controlled treadmill study with postural perturbations, which simulated trips and slips. The subjects were harnessed for safety. Overall, 21 subjects were healthy controls, 18 patients were at least one-year post-VBT, 15 patients were at least one-year post-fusion, and 25 were pre-operative scoliosis patients. Subject weight, height, and treadmill acceleration were recorded and used to determine anteroposterior single (ASSTs, PSSTs) and multiple (AMSTs, PMSTs) stepping thresholds to describe the maximum torque a patient could withstand before failing to recover from the simulated trip. Independent t-tests were run to compare groups under the advice of a master statistician with expertise in orthopedic surgery. Results: Pre-operative scoliosis patients had lower PSSTs than healthy controls (uncorrected p = 0.036). No significant differences were observed between pre-operative and post-operative groups for both fusion and VBT. There was no significant difference in ASST, AMST, or PMST between any of the groups. Conclusions: The lower PSST in pre-operative scoliosis patients compared to healthy controls may reflect impaired reactive balance and potentially increased fall risk. Interestingly, there was no significant difference in reactive balance measures between pre-operative and post-operative scoliosis patients or between post-fusion and post-VBT patients.

Background/Objectives: The burden of scoliosis care extends beyond treatment costs and includes missed school for patients and lost income for parents. Chronic absenteeism, defined as more than 18 days of missed school, can have a significant impact on a child’s educational progression, but missed school and work due to scoliosis treatment are not well quantified in the literature. This study investigates absenteeism among scoliosis patients and their caregivers. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study of survey results based on surgery timing and surgery type. Patients and caregivers presenting for clinic visits for scoliosis treatment at a single large tertiary care center from 2014 to 2022 were queried. Results: We collected 2772 surveys from 1104 unique patients. Of these, 223 surveys from 132 patients were within one year of surgery: 140 post-fusion surveys, 71 post-nonfusion surveys, and 11 post-halo/multistage surgery surveys. A total of 2280 surveys were from 1022 nonoperatively treated patients. School absenteeism was significantly higher for surgeries during the school year compared to summer in both the fusion and nonfusion groups, though work absenteeism showed no significant differences. Halo/multistage surgery patients had the highest rates of absenteeism. Conclusions: This study highlights the impacts of scoliosis surgery timing and type on absenteeism among patients and their caregivers. Surgery during summer breaks reduces school absenteeism and academic disruption. Halo/multistage surgery patients face the greatest risk of chronic absenteeism from school, indicating a need for targeted interventions. Optimized surgical timing and planning can help families navigate the educational and financial challenges of scoliosis treatment.