Xeros, Helena

Abstract Background and aims Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is characterized by recurrent thunderclap headaches and reversible multifocal cerebral arterial narrowing. Although prognosis is generally favorable, a subset of patients develops cerebrovascular complications that may drive long-term disability; this study aims to identify factors associated with these complications. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 348 patients with probable or definite RCVS evaluated at Mayo Clinic between 2010-2023. Diagnostic criteria were adapted from RCVS2 and ICHD-3. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage; secondary outcome was poor functional status (modified Rankin Scale ≥2 within one year). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of these outcomes. Results Cerebrovascular complications occurred in 37.6% of patients and were the strongest determinant of poor functional outcome (aOR 5.05, 95% CI 2.04–12.51). On multivariable analysis, older age (aOR per year 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.04) and angiographically visible vasoconstriction (aOR 3.14, 95% CI 1.85–5.33) were independently associated with higher risk of cerebrovascular complications, whereas male sex (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30–0.99), thunderclap headache at presentation (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11–0.86), and sexual activity as a trigger (aOR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08–0.42) were associated with lower risk of these complications. Conclusions Cerebrovascular complications are common and strongly predict disability. Angiographic vasoconstriction and older age identify patients at higher risk, whereas thunderclap headache and sexual activity as a trigger mark a more benign phenotype. These findings may guide early risk stratification and help tailored monitoring strategies. Conflict of interest Name of author: nothing to disclose.

Background and Objectives: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is characterized by multisystem involvement, including renal cysts, hepatic cysts, intracranial aneurysms, and aortic root dilatation and dissection. Though exceedingly rare, cervical artery dissections (CeAD) have been reported in association with ADPKD. The aim of this retrospective observational study is to investigate clinical features in patients with ADPKD that increase the probability of an associated CeAD diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 was utilized to compare clinical features for patients with an ICD-10 code diagnosis of ADPKD, CeAD, and both ADPKD and CeAD. The Cochran–Armitage test and Chi-square test were utilized to assess clinical features or trends in ADPKD patients associated with a concurrent CeAD diagnosis. Results: Between 2016 and 2020, there were 224,065 people with ADPKD, 86,135 with CeAD and 155 with both (0.05%). The total cohort had a mean age of 56.74 years, with 47.26% female participants (p = 0.70), and was predominantly white (66.15%, p < 0.001). In patients with ADPKD, comorbid acute ischemic stroke (p < 0.001), transient ischemic attack (p < 0.001), aortic dissection (p < 0.001), coronary artery dissection (p < 0.001), subarachnoid hemorrhage (p < 0.001), coagulation defects (p = 0.002), and hypertension (p < 0.001) are risk factors associated with an increased probability of concomitant CeAD. Conclusions: CeAD in ADPKD patients is rare. In ADPKD patients, acute ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, aortic dissection, coronary artery dissection, subarachnoid hemorrhage, coagulation defects, and hypertension are risk factors of concomitant CeAD. Recognizing these factors can aid in the decision to screen for concomitant CeAD in patients with ADPKD.

(1) Background: Cranial neuropathy is a commonly encountered condition with various underlying etiologies. While carotid artery dissection (CAD) is a well-recognized cause of ischemic stroke, CAD-related cranial neuropathy is rare and poorly characterized. We have conducted a comprehensive review of the published literature to better characterize its clinical course and outcomes. (2) Methods: We systematically reviewed the PubMed, CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase literature for CAD-related cranial neuropathy. Data extracted included demographics, affected cranial nerves, symptoms, time course, diagnostic approach, and therapeutic interventions. (3) Results: From 635 screened studies, 97 met the inclusion criteria, yielding data on 108 patients with CAD- or dissecting pseudoaneurysm (dPSA)-related cranial neuropathy. The hypoglossal nerve (CN XII) was most commonly affected (76%), and the distal cervical internal carotid artery was the most frequently involved segment (89%). Most patients (90%) were treated with antithrombotic therapy which included either antiplatelets (47%) or anticoagulants (43%). Thirteen patients (12%) underwent endovascular intervention, nearly all with a diagnosed dPSA (mean size, 14.8 mm). Outcomes were favorable, with 94% experiencing symptom improvement. (4) Conclusions: Despite inherent limitations, our study demonstrates that CAD-related cranial neuropathy is typically a benign condition that has excellent outcomes with medical management. Endovascular treatment is rarely performed and is primarily reserved for cases involving diagnosed dPSA.

Introduction: Iatrogenic cervical artery dissection (CeAD) may result from various procedures such as procedural and diagnostic angiography. Due to the rarity of iatrogenic CeAD, existing literature on management and outcomes is limited. This observational cohort study investigates clinical approaches and long-term outcomes of iatrogenic CeAD after endovascular interventions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review to analyze patients who underwent endovascular treatments at the Mayo Clinic from 1998 to 2021. We focused on patients with iatrogenic CeAD resulting from interventions. Pertinent patient factors were extracted. Descriptive statistics highlighted the relationship between treatments and long-term clinical outcomes. Results: Between 1998 and 2021, 21,191 patients underwent catheter cerebral angiography. Among them, 32 had iatrogenic CeAD (30 identified as white, 23 women, median age 59 [range 40.5–92.9]). Common comorbidities included hypertension (62.5%), smoking (56.3%), and hyperlipidemia (46.9%). Of the 32 patients, 9(28.1%) had dissection with diagnostic angiograms, 6(18.8%) endovascular thrombectomy, 15(46.9%) aneurysm treatment, and 2(6.3%) angioplasty with or without stenting. The location of dissections was dependent upon the intervention: 17(53.1%) had internal carotid artery dissection, 13(40.6%) vertebral artery dissection, and 2(6.3%) common carotid dissection. One patient was symptomatic with neck pain. All dissections were diagnosed by cerebral angiography during the same session as the initial intervention. Only 4(12.5%) were treated with hyperacute stenting. Following diagnosis, 30(93.7%) were placed on antithrombotic therapy, including aspirin alone (34.4%) or dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (37.5%). The median duration of acute treatment was 3 months. The median duration of imaging follow up was 1022 days. Follow-up imaging showed an excellent radiological course, with complete or nearly complete dissection remodeling. Conclusions: Iatrogenic CeAD with endovascular interventions is rare and typically benign. Most cases are managed medically without significant clinical complications or long-term negative outcomes. Single or dual antiplatelet therapies remain preferred treatments, in line with current trends. Key factors influencing clinical decision-making include location, occlusion rate, pseudoaneurysm formation, intracranial extension, distal collateral circulation, and ischemia.

Background Iatrogenic cervical artery dissection (CeAD) results from various procedures including interventional angiographic procedures and diagnostic angiography. Iatrogenic CeAD is rare, resulting in limited literature on management and outcomes. This observational cohort study investigates approaches and outcomes of iatrogenic CeAD after endovascular interventions. Methods We conducted a retrospective review for patients who underwent endovascular intervention with resulting iatrogenic CeAD at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from 1998 to 2021. Pertinent patient factors were extracted and descriptive statistics generated. Results Between 1998 and 2021, 21,191 patients underwent catheter-based cerebral angiography. Thirty-two had iatrogenic CeADs (23 women; median age 59 [range 40.5–92.9]). Common comorbidities included hypertension (62.5%), smoking (56.3%), and hyperlipidemia (46.9%). Nine (28.1%) had dissection with diagnostic angiograms, 6 (18.8%) endovascular thrombectomy, 15 (46.9%) intracranial aneurysm treatment/coiling, and 2 (6.3%) intracranial angioplasty with/without stenting. All dissections were diagnosed by cerebral angiography during the same session as initial interventions. Four (12.5%) underwent hyperacute stenting. Thirty (93.7%) were placed on antithrombotic therapy with aspirin alone (34.4%) or dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (37.5%). Median duration of acute treatment was three months. Follow-up imaging showed excellent radiological course. Conclusions Iatrogenic CeAD with endovascular interventions is rare and typically benign. Most are managed medically without complications or long-term negative outcomes. Oral single or dual-antiplatelet therapies are preferred compared to previous studies which emphasize intravenous anticoagulation. The duration of acute therapy varied from three months to lifelong. Key factors influencing clinical decision-making may include occlusion rate, pseudoaneurysm formation, intracranial extension, distal collateral circulation, and resultant ischemia.