Dasari, Surendra

Abstract Introduction: Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) harboring chromosomal rearrangements (double-hit, DH) or coexpression of MYC and BCL2 (double-expressor, DE) represents biologically aggressive subgroups with inferior clinical outcomes. Oncogene-driven DNA replication stress (ODRS) is a hallmark of MYC and BCL2 dysregulation; however, the DNA damage response (DDR) pathways that sustain replication and cell survival under ODRS remain incompletely defined in DLBCL. Identifying DDR dependencies induced by ODRS may reveal therapeutically actionable vulnerabilities in DH/DE-LBCL. Methods: We studied DH/DE-LBCL cell lines (OCILY1, SUDHL2, DOHH2), non-DH/DE-LBCL cell lines (HT, KARPAS422, HBL1), and benign retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells engineered to overexpress MYC and/or BCL2. ODRS and DNA damage were assessed by phosphorylation of RPA (S4/S8, S33) and H2AX histone (γH2AX), respectively, using immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, and western blot (WB). Activity of homologous recombination (HR), nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) pathways were quantified with established reporter assays. POLΘ (gene: POLQ) expression, an MMEJ marker, was evaluated by qPCR and WB. DDR activity was assessed using genomic signatures from whole-exome sequencing data of 404 LBCL patients. In vitro sensitivity of LBCL cells to POLΘ and PARP inhibitors was assessed with publicly available small-molecule inhibitors using CellTiterGlo and clonogenic assays, and therapeutic efficacy was validated in a DH-LBCL xenograft model in NRG mice. Results: DH/DE-LBCL cells and primary tumors exhibited increased ODRS and persistent DNA damage compared with non-DH/DE-LBCL models, including accumulation of γH2AX in mitosis. Functional profiling revealed selective upregulation of MMEJ in MYC/BCL2-overexpressing cells, with minimal changes in HR or NHEJ activity. POLQ expression was significantly increased in DH/DE-LBCL cell lines and primary samples, and the ID6 signature (associated with MMEJ activity) was significantly enriched in DH-LBCL tumors compared to non-DH/DE-LBCL tumors. POLΘ inhibition demonstrated greater toxicity in DH/DE-LBCL and in MYC-overexpressing RPE cells compared to non-DH/DE-LBCL and wild-type RPEs. Combined inhibition of POLΘ and PARP resulted in marked synergy in vitro. The therapeutic efficacy of POLΘ inhibition, with the synthetic lethality of concurrent PARP inhibition, was validated in the DH-LBCL xenograft model. Concurrent POLΘ and PARP inhibition with small-molecule inhibitors induced an antitumor effect in vivo, with increased overall survival in mice compared with vehicle- or olaparib-single-agent-treated groups. Conclusions: ODRS in DH/DE-LBCL creates a selective dependence on MMEJ mediated by POLΘ. Therapeutic targeting of POLΘ, alone or in combination with PARP inhibition, exploits this vulnerability and represents a promising strategy for this high-risk LBCL subset. These findings provide a biological rationale for clinical translation of POLΘ-directed therapies in DH/DE-LBCL. Citation Format: Cecilia Ayala-Zambrano, Dongni Yi, Michelle Manske, Kimberly Gwin, Richar Kandasamy, Surendra Dasari, Anne Novak, Shuhei Asada, Xiaosheng Wu, Zhenkun Lou, Thomas Witzig, Jithma Abeykoon. c-MYC/BCL2 induced replication stress drives dependence on POLQ-mediated microhomology-mediated end joining in aggressive large B-cell lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fifth AACR International Meeting on Advances in Malignant Lymphoma: From Discovery to Clinical Impact; 2026 Jun 24-27; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2026;7(3_Suppl):Abstract nr A029.

Abstract Background Extramedullary disease (EMD) in multiple myeloma (MM) represents an aggressive phenotype with poor outcomes. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on clonal plasma cells (CPCs) from EMD tissue, solitary plasmacytomas (SPM), and bone marrow aspirates (BMAs) from patients with MM to identify transcriptional states unique to EMD. Methods We processed FFPE tumor samples from EMD and SPMs and cryopreserved CD138+ BMAs from MM, using the 10x Genomics FLEX platform. Cells/nuclei were fixed, hybridized with Human WTA probes, pooled, and sequenced (10,000–40,000 cells/library) on NovaSeq X. After removing low quality cells, data was normalized and integrated using RPCA in Seurat. Plasma cell identity was assigned via Cellarium and canonical markers. Clonality was inferred by light chain restrictions and refined via random forest modeling. Cell cycle effects were regressed out to reduce proliferation bias. Results We analyzed 128, 908 CPCs from 16 samples [8 EMD (62, 669 CPCs), 4 SPM (20, 607 CPCs), 4 BMA (45, 632 CPCs)] and identified eight transcriptionally distinct cell clusters. Differential expression and pathway comparisons were performed between EMD/SPM/BMA within each of these clusters. Integration of gene expression and pathway analyses revealed consistent upregulation of cell cycle and E2F pathways in EMD. We identified two highly proliferative cell cycle clusters (Cluster 2 with S-phase genes and Cluster 4 with a G2/M transcriptional program) that were expanded in EMD compared to BMA and SPM. Cluster 0 comprised a quiescent CPC population enriched for RNA processing pathways alongside downregulation of ER stress and autophagy. EMD cells demonstrated suppressed interleukin signaling [fold change (FC) –33.8), and class I MHC antigen processing (FC –23.5) relative to BMA, suggestive of an immune suppressive transcriptional program. Angiogenesis-related genes [VEGFA (log2FC 2.4), ADM2 (log2FC 2.2)] and EZH2 [log2FC 2.1; q<0.0001)] were upregulated in EMD. Compared to SPM, EMD plasma cells in this cluster demonstrated marked downregulation of CD74 (log2FC –2.6; q<0.0001), a key modulator of MHC class II antigen presentation. Cluster 1 comprised of metabolically stressed secretory CPCs and displayed downregulation of early growth response pathways in EMD compared to BMA, concurrent with upregulation of E2F signaling. Suppression of IL-2/STAT5, IL-6/JAK/STAT3, and TGF-β pathways in EMD suggests reduced reliance on bone marrow–derived cytokines and impaired immunoregulatory signaling. CD44 was upregulated in EMD versus BMA (log2FC 3.2), consistent with its role in EMD spread and marrow independence. Cluster 3 was enriched for extracellular matrix–interacting plasma cells (COL1A1, MMP2) with upregulated epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathways in EMD compared to both BMA (FC 7.5) and SPM (FC 7.07). Cluster 6 was defined by a migratory, motility-primed plasma cell population (CD44, AHNAK, LMNA and S100A10). Notably, IL32 was overexpressed in EMD compared to BMA (log2FC 5.1; adj. p = 2.02×10⁻¹⁴), a finding linked to hypoxia-driven proliferation. Compared to SPM, EMD cells also had elevated MYC/E2F activity and DNA repair, hallmarks of a proliferative phenotype. Cluster 5 displayed a strong interferon-stimulated gene signature (ISG15, IFIT1, TNFSF10), with enrichment of type I IFN, JAK–STAT, and TNF pathways. Within this inflammatory cluster, EMD exhibited marked suppression of immune signaling, metabolism (TCA, OXPHOS), and TP53 programs, consistent with an immune-evasive, metabolically suppressed, and deregulated state. Finally, within Cluster 7, a smaller subset defined by NFκB–driven anti-apoptotic transcriptional activity, EMD exhibited significant downregulation of KLF2 (log2FC –3.7; adj. p = 1.77×10⁻²⁷), likely reflecting disruption of the KDM3A–KLF2–IRF4 axis, a transcriptional network critical for bone marrow homing and plasma cell survival. We consistently observed downregulation of the MAPK pathway in EMD compared to BMA, aligning with prior bulk RNA-seq data and contrasting with the near-universal presence of MAPK mutations, highlighting a disconnect between mutational status and pathway activation. Conclusion In the largest yet reported single-cell transcriptional atlas of EMD and SPM, we demonstrate EMD to be highly proliferative with metabolic reprogramming, EMT, and downregulation of key immunologic signaling pathways, indicating immune escape and microenvironmental independence.

Abstract Introduction Surface proteins in cancer not only reflect tumor–microenvironment interactions but also serve as targets for diagnostic flow cytometry and precision therapies, including monoclonal antibodies and CAR-T cell therapies. A better understanding of plasma cell immunophenotypes could inform flow cytometric prognostic assays and development of targeted therapies. Methods RNA-seq and Seq-FISH data from CD138-enriched bone marrow plasma cells, along with corresponding clinical annotations, were obtained from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation-CoMMpass Study. A curated list of surface genes was assembled by integrating three sources: the Human Protein Atlas (plasma membrane and cell junction annotations), the Gene-Set Enrichment Analysis membrane-associated gene set (Ontology:0016020), and the Cell Surface Protein Atlas (validated high-confidence category). A total of 4,579 genes coding for cell surface proteins were identified. Genes below the 25th variance percentile were removed. PCA (≥90% variance) followed by k-means (k=2, silhouette) and confirmed by hierarchical clustering. A Plasma Cell Maturity (PBM) score was computed using singscore on 84 mature plasma cell–associated genes to compare cluster phenotypes. Pathway analysis was done using GSEA software for Hallmark pathways. Clinical biomarkers and survival kinetics were compared between the clusters. Results 761 newly diagnosed patients were included. (Age: 27-93 years, median overall survival/OS: 29 months/mo). Clustering revealed two groups which we termed Atypical/Aggressive Cluster 1 (C1, n=105, 13.8%) and Classical Cluster 2 (C2, n=656, 86.2%), based on the patterns and clinical characteristics. Among non-missing cases, high-risk disease per the International Myeloma Society–International Myeloma Working Group (IMS–IMWG) definition was observed in 27.7% of patients in C2 (n = 552) and 24.7% in C1 (n = 90) (p = 0.4).C1 exhibited enrichment for t(14;16)-MAF (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1–6.1, p = 0.04) and t(11;14)-CCND1 (OR = 1.7, CI: 1.01–2.8, p = 0.04). In contrast, hyperdiploidy was more common in C2 (OR for C1 = 0.6, CI: 0.4–0.9, p = 0.04). Elevated LDH was observed in C1 (OR = 2.6, CI: 1.6–4, p < 0.001). Median serum Beta-2 microglobulin was lower in C1.(p=0.009) Upregulated genes in C1 in decreasing order of log Fold Change(logFC): AHNAK, MT-ND1, EEF2, EZR, HLA-B, TXNIP, HLA-E, TRIB1, MCL1, RHOB, CD74, CFLAR, HLA-A, HERPUD1, RPSA, ERN1, HSP90AB1, RAPGEF2, ADGRE5, and LAPTM5. Downregulated genes in C1 in descending order of |logFC|: B2M, SDC1 (CD138), HSP90B1, SEL1L, CALR, CANX, PECAM1, SLAMF7, STT3A, TNFRSF17 (BCMA), FCRL5, STT3B, PALM2AKAP2, CD53, PARP1, CCR2, RPN1, CD38, EDNRB, and LMAN2. Upregulated pathways in C1: proliferation (MYC, E2F, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, KRAS, Wnt); evasion of apoptosis (p53, TGF-β, Notch, NF-κB, IL6/JAK/STAT3); Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (angiogenesis, apical junction); inflammatory (interferon, TNF-α, complement, IL2/STAT5); metabolic reprogramming (oxidative phosphorylation, lipid/cholesterol); and stress (DNA repair, unfolded protein response). The PBM score for C1 was significantly lower, suggesting a less differentiated phenotype. C1 patients had inferior survival (n = 93, median OS 43.9 mo, p = 0.04) compared to those in the C2 cluster (n = 559, median OS 102.5 mo). Patients in the C1 + IMS–IMWG high-risk status had the shortest survival (20.7 mo), compared to C1+low (50 mo), C2/high (68.3 mo), and C2+low (not reached). In a multivariable analysis, C1 status (HR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.1–3.4, p = 0.02) was an independent predictor, along with older age (1.05), UAMS70 (1.02), EMC-92 (1.4). In C1, early (<18 mo) progression occurred in 76.3% (n=71) (p < 0.001). In patients receiving first line of treatment(LOT1), median PFS was 39.7 mo in C1vs. 47.3 mo in C2 (p=0.8). Among patients who received stem cell transplant in LOT1, the median survival for the C2 was 102.5 mo, compared to 44.5 mo for C1 (n = 52) (p = 0.01). Among non-SCT patients on Immunomodulator + Proteasome Inhibitor therapy, C1 (n=28) had shorter survival of 50.0 vs. 71.7 C2 (n=137; p =0.8). Conclusion Our transcriptomic analysis identified a higher-risk group of patients (C1) exhibiting downregulation of myeloma specific markers (CD38, CD138, BCMA, SLAMF7, FCRL5) and inferior outcomes. It is important to diagnose and find appropriate therapy for these patients as they don't obtain the same benefit from the current standard of therapy as the remaining patients.

Abstract Anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs) are CD30+ T-cell lymphomas that share pathologic features but differ in presentation, outcome, and genetics. Current classification incorporates clinical presentation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) status but inadequately addresses molecular heterogeneity and therapeutic vulnerabilities. We studied 689 patients with ALCL in the LLMPP (Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project) and performed expert consensus review, genetic subtyping (ALK, DUSP22, TP63, and triple negative), and immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated STAT3Tyr705. RNA sequencing with unsupervised gene expression profiling in 393 patients identified 2 main molecular types of ALCL that could be predicted with 91% accuracy based on the presence (type I) or absence (type II) of phosphorylated STAT3Y705 expression. Type I ALCLs included ALK+ ALCL and a subset of triple-negative ALCLs (TN-I); type II ALCLs included tumors with DUSP22 and/or TP63 rearrangements and the remaining triple-negative ALCLs (TN-II). Type I ALCLs were enriched for JAK-STAT3, whereas type II ALCLs were enriched for non–tyrosine kinase pathways, particularly epigenetic regulators such as EZH2. Immunohistochemistry showed overexpression of EZH2 and its trimethylated substrate H3K27. Prognosis in systemic ALCL was favorable for DUSP22-rearranged ALCL (5-year overall survival, 95%) and ALK+ ALCL (88%), intermediate for triple-negative ALCL (TN-I, 52% and TN-II, 37%), and poor for TP63-rearranged ALCL (0%). We introduce an integrated molecular classification that preserves currently diagnosed ALCL entities but identifies 4 molecularly distinct ALK− ALCL subtypes (DUSP22-rearranged, TP63-rearranged, TN-I, and TN-II). This classification can be easily implemented on paraffin tissue in routine practice or clinical trials, and stratifies ALCL into diagnostically, prognostically, biologically, and potentially therapeutically relevant subtypes.

Abstract Extramedullary disease (EMD) is associated with an inferior prognosis and lower response rates to conventional multiple myeloma (MM)–directed therapies compared to MM without EMD. A deeper understanding of the molecular landscape and underlying drivers of EMD is essential to identify potential targets for novel therapeutic strategies. To address this, we performed whole-exome sequencing on EMD tumor tissue from 18 unique patients and bone marrow aspirates (BMAs) from 20 patients at the time of EMD development. Notably, paired EMD and BMA samples were collected from 6 patients at the point of EMD diagnosis, allowing for direct comparison of molecular profiles. Our analysis revealed a near-universal presence of mutations within the MAPK pathway in EMD samples (94%), compared to BMAs (60%; odds ratio, 10.7; P = .02; q < 0.1). Additionally, mutations in established driver genes (NRAS, KRAS, and BRAF) were common and frequently clonal, suggesting their central role in EMD pathogenesis. We also identified alterations in genes associated with cell adhesion and migration (ROBO1, ROBO2, and FAT1) and the SWI/SNF complex and epigenetic regulators (ARID1A, KMT2C, KMT2D, and EP300), although these were predominantly subclonal. Furthermore, we frequently detected biallelic alterations in the tumor suppressor genes MAX (22%), a binding partner for MYC, and CDKN2C (17%). Genomic complexity was significantly higher in EMD samples than BMAs, as evidenced by increased tumor mutational burden and the enrichment of 1q gain/amplifications. These findings underscore the distinct molecular profile of EMD compared to BMA and highlight the genomically complex and heterogeneous nature of extramedullary disease in MM.

Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma demonstrate an increasing incidence of extramedullary disease (EMD), noted in up to 30% of patients. Presence of EMD portends a markedly inferior prognosis with limited response to salvage therapies, including immune effector therapy. Understanding the molecular alterations in EMD is key to exploring novel therapeutic approaches but remains to be well-characterized. Here we describe the mutational landscape and biologic pathways with alterations in a large cohort of patients with EMD. Methods: We included 18 paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from true EMD biopsies (non-bone contiguous disease) for whole exome sequencing (WES); biopsies from paraskeletal/bone-contiguous soft tissue were not considered. Germline sequencing was performed utilizing cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at initial diagnosis from patients without evidence of circulating tumor cells. Additionally, we studied 12 CD138-sorted cryopreserved bone marrow (BM) aspirates collected at the time of development of EMD. Following standard DNA extraction and library construction practices, we performed WES on the EMD, BM and PBMC samples. Variant calling was performed using consensus calls observed in at least 2 out of the 3 callers (Mutect2, VarScan, Strelka2) and these were included for downstream analysis. Synonymous and low-impact variants were filtered. Pathway analysis was performed using the PanCancer driver gene sets and compared using Fisher's exact test. Results: The median age of patients with EMD was 65.6 years (range 46.2-86 years). Seven (39%) patients had de novo (previously untreated) EMD and 11 (61%) had secondary EMD (developed at relapse). The MAPK pathway was frequently mutated, most commonly involving NRAS (33%), KRAS (22%) and BRAF (22%) genes. These mutations were mutually exclusive. Alterations in TP53 were noted in 11% of EMD samples. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in epigenetic modulators were frequently noted in EMD, with the most prevalent alterations seen in ARID1A (33%), KMT2C (28%), EP300 (22%) and KMT2B (22%). Both ARID1A and EP300 are postulated to play a role in IRF4 regulation and plasma cell differentiation. Additionally, inhibition of EP300 can be a viable therapeutic strategy in MM through disruption of IRF4 signaling. We noted frequent mutations in the roundabout (ROBO) genes ROBO1 and ROBO2, observed in 22% and 28% of EMD samples, respectively. ROBO1 has been demonstrated to be necessary for myeloma cell adhesion to BM stromal and endothelial cells, with ROBO1 knockout MM cells infused in mice demonstrating a tendency for extramedullary dissemination. Similarly, variants in LRP1B, a frequently altered large putative tumor suppressor gene in the LDL receptor family, were noted in 33 % of EMD samples. Depletion of LRP1B has been demonstrated to promote anchorage-independent growth, cell migration and invasion in vitro. Notably, in the paired BM samples, no SNVs were noted in ARID1A, LRP1B, ROBO1 and ROBO2 genes (q-value not significant). In paired samples, among the shared mutations of interest, we noted expansion of the BRAF clone in 2 EMD samples [variant allele frequency (VAF) of 3% and 13% in BM and 58% and 29% in the paired samples, respectively]. An expansion of a shared KRAS mutation was noted in another EMD sample (VAF of 15% in BM and 29% in EMD). The frequently altered cellular pathways in EMD samples (n=18) included the MAPK pathway (89%), chromatin histone modifier pathway (83%), transcriptional regulation (83%), immune signaling (72%) and RNA abundance (72%). In the cohort of paired EMD and BM samples (n=24), notable enrichment was evident in EMD for MAPK pathway alterations [91% in EMD vs. 25% in BM q=0.02] and chromatin histone modifier pathway (83% in EMD vs. 42% in BM, q <0.01). Conclusions: Patients withEMD demonstrate a near universal presence of alterations in the MAPK pathway. Variants in chromatin modifiers regulating plasma cell differentiation and genes involved in BM stromal adhesion and homing of plasma cells were frequently noted, potentially facilitating the extramedullary spread of myeloma cells. Functional studies are needed to evaluate these hypotheses. Targeting EP300, ARID1A and downstream MEK/ERK inhibition as part of combination therapies may represent promising therapeutic approaches for further exploration in EMD.