Toumeh, Nadia

Introduction: Patients with non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), especially adolescents and young adults, can face late effects from treatment, including decreased fertility. Due to time constraints prior to treatment initiation and sometimes financial limitations, implementing fertility counseling and referral-based guideline care remains challenging. We aim to understand the occurrence and predictors of fertility counseling and preservation in patients with NHL in the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) cohort study. Methods: The LEO cohort prospectively enrolled newly diagnosed patients with NHL from 2015-2020 at 8 academic medical centers in the US. Clinical. Treatment data were abstracted from medical records, pathology was reviewed and classified by a LEO pathologist, and participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. Participants were then prospectively followed to identify outcomes and collect additional patient reported data, including a survivorship questionnaire at follow-up 3 years (FU3) after diagnosis that included items on fertility counseling and preservation. The questionnaire contained two fertility questions analyzed: whether healthcare providers discussed the impact of lymphoma treatment on fertility, and whether providers discussed the process of fertility preservation. This analysis was based on participants aged 18-50 years at enrollment and who completed the fertility questions at FU3. Women who had undergone natural or procedural menopause and men who had undergone vasectomy pre-treatment were excluded. We estimated the association of demographic and clinical factors with fertility preservation using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Seventy-seven patients were included in the analysis: 36 females (46%) and 41 males (53%). The median age of diagnosis was 40 years (IQR 30-45), and 36 (47%) participants were in the age 18-39-year category. Participant self-identified race/ethnicity was 69% non-Hispanic White, 22% Hispanic, 4% Black and 3% Asian. Sixty (78%) patients were treated with alkylators, 12 (15.6%) with non-alkylators, and 5 (6.5%) with radiation. Fifty-five (71%) of the patients were classified as having aggressive lymphoma, with follicular, extranodal marginal zone, primary cutaneous follicle center, and nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma defined as indolent and remaining subtypes aggressive. Around 6% of female patients underwent fertility preservation after lymphoma diagnosis, compared to 12.2% of male patients. All the patients who had undergone fertility preservation after lymphoma diagnosis were in the 18-39-year age group. On univariate analysis, females were more likely to have undergone fertility toxicity and preservation discussions compared to males, with 72% of females and 59% of males recalling a discussion regarding fertility (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.7-4.9, p=0.21). Those age 18-39 were significantly more likely to have undergone fertility discussion compared to those aged 40-50 (OR 10.2, 95% CI 3.3-39.2, p<0.001). Patients treated with alkylating therapy were significantly more likely to undergo fertility discussion when compared to those on non-alkylating therapy (OR 9.0, 95% CI 2.3-45.5, p<0.01). In addition, 75% of those with aggressive lymphoma compared to 41% of patients with indolent lymphoma had fertility discussion (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.5-12.4, p=0.01). White patients were significantly less likely than Hispanic, Black and Asian patients to have fertility discussion (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.04-0.6, p<0.01). In the multivariable analysis, alkylating therapy (OR 8.9, 95% CI 1.6-66.7) and age 18-39 years (OR 10.9, 95% CI 2.9-55.3) remained significant predictors of fertility discussion; White race was also trending towards significance (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.04-1.0, p=0.08). Aggressive lymphoma subtype was not a significant predictor of fertility discussion. Conclusions: In this cohort of lymphoma survivors 3 years post-diagnosis, we found that Hispanic patients, those diagnosed at a younger age and exposed to alkylating chemotherapy agents were significantly more likely to undergo discussions regarding the effects of lymphoma treatment on fertility. Our study highlights the importance of all cancer patients of childbearing age having the opportunity to address fertility concerns during clinic visits.

Introduction: DDX41, DEAD-box RNA helicase 41 gene located on chromosome 5q25.3, is one of the most mutated genes in patients with germline predisposition to myeloid neoplasms. Germline and somatic mutations often have different locations and patterns of mutation, with some hot-spots displaying diversity based on ethnicity. We aimed to explore clinical outcomes in patients with various DDX41 hot-spots. Methods: A retrospective study of patients at Mayo Clinic with DDX41 mutation identified through Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) between 2016 and 2024. Patients classified as germline DDX41 variants or somatic variants based on confirmed germline testing results. Data regarding mutations recorded at time of patients' first in-house NGS. We completed unadjusted comparisons using continuous or categorical variables, and survival rates assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression analysis. Median overall survival calculated from time of NGS to last follow-up or death using BlueSky Statistics V.10.3.4 Results: Clinical Characteristics: Eighty-two patients analyzed, predominantly male (69.5%), with median age of diagnosis of 68 years (IQR 62-75). Most common diagnosis was MDS (50%), followed by AML (22%) and myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) (7.3%). Fourteen percent were DDX41 mutation carriers, 4.9% clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS), and 1.2% chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL). MDS-IB2 was the prevalent MDS subtype (56.1%), and 83.3% of AML patients were intermediate risk. Cytogenetics normal in 73.8% of patients, with del20 being the most common abnormality (7.5%). Twenty-five (30.5%) of patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Forty-nine patients (59.8%) had pathogenic DDX41 mutation only, 15 (18.3%) had only VUS, and 18 (22.0%) had both. Molecular Characteristic s: Mutation hot-spots included 12.2% with p.Arg525His only, 28% p.M1I only, 9.8% p.Asp140GlyFs*2 only, 9.8% p.Arg525 with co-mutation other than p.M1I/p.Asp140. Two patients (2.4%) had p.M1I co-mutation with non-p.Arg525 and p.Asp140, while 1 patient (1.2%) had p.M1I and p.Arg525, and 1 patient (1.2%) had p.Asp140 and p.Arg525. Lastly, 33 patients (40.2%) had mutations in hot-spots other than specified in this study. Median hemoglobin (Hg) was lowest in patients with p.Arg525 hotspot mutation (9.9 g/dl), compared to median Hg of 11.2 g/dl in group with p.M1I and 10.4 g/dl in p.Asp140 only group (p=0.87). The most common cytogenetics in patients with only p.Arg525 and only p.M1I hot-spot mutation was normal cytogenetics (70% and 90.9%, p=0.5). In the 16 patients with proven germline DDX41 mutation, 7 (43.8%) had mutations in only p.M1I. Lastly, median (m) VAF was significantly lower in the group with only p.Arg525 hot-spot mutation (9.5%, IQR 5.5-13.8), compared to mVAF of 48% in patients with only p.M1I (IQR 48.0-49.5, p<0.001). Co-mutations: The most frequent co-mutation was DNMT3A (11.0%), followed by JAK2 (9.8%).Mean number of co-mutations in p.Arg525 only was 0.6, 0.3 in p.M1I only, and 0.5 in p.Asp140 only (p=0.8). Most common co-mutation in p.M1I was ASXL1, with 13.0% of patients with p.M1I only having ASXL1 co-mutation (p=0.062). The most common co-mutation in p.Asp140 was DNMT3A (p=0.7). Survival: Median overall survival (mOS) was 21.5 months (IQR 12.4-38.6). mOS for p.Arg525 only group was 31.3, compared to 41.2 months in p.M1I only (p=0.197). At 12- and 24-months, survival rate was 88.9% and 59.3% in the p.Arg525 only group, compared to p.M1I group with 100% survival rate at 12 months and 89.5% at 24 months. p.Asp140 had 87.5% survival rate at both 12 months and 24 months. Males in p.M1I group had lower survival rate at 24 months (81.8%), compared to 100% survival in females. p.M1I only group with alloHCT also had lower 24 month survival at 60% compared to 100% in group who did not undergo alloHCT. Conclusions: The p.M1I hot-spot was commonly seen in patients with germline DDX41 mutation, likely resulting in significantly higher VAF percentage. Co-mutations frequency differed by hot spot mutation while p.Arg525 as second mutation was seen mainly in cases other than p.M1I/pArg140Gly. Overall survival appears to be higher in p.M1I/pArg140Gly compared to p.Arg525His hot-spot mutation, though males with p.M1I and those who underwent alloHCT had lower survival. Findings suggest implications for clinical outcomes based on DDX41 mutation hot-spots.