Ding, Husheng

Neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) contribute to early neuromyelitis optica (NMO) histopathology initiated by IgG targeting astrocytic aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channels. Yet, the mechanisms underlying neutrophil recruitment and their pathogenic roles in disease progression remain unclear. To investigate molecular-cellular events preceding classical complement cascade activation in a mouse NMO model, we continuously infused, via spinal subarachnoid route, a non-complement-activating mouse monoclonal AQP4-IgG. Parenchymal infiltration of netting neutrophils containing C5a ensued with microglial activation and motor impairment but no blood-brain barrier leakage. Motor impairment and neuronal dysfunction both reversed when AQP4-IgG infusion stopped. Two-photon microscopy and electron microscopy–based reconstructions revealed physical interaction of infiltrating neutrophils with microglia. Ablation of either peripheral neutrophils or microglia attenuated the motor deficit, highlighting their synergistic pathogenic roles. Of note, mice lacking complement receptor C5aR1 exhibited reduction in neutrophil infiltration, microglial lysosomal activation, neuronal lipid droplet burden, and motor impairment. Pharmacological inhibition of C5aR1 recapitulated this protection. Immunohistochemical analysis of an NMO patient’s spinal cord revealed disease-associated microglia surrounding motor neurons in nondestructive lesions. Our study identifies neutrophil-derived C5a signaling through microglial C5aR1 as a key early driver of reversible motor neuron dysfunction in the precytolytic phase of NMO.

ABSTRACT T‐cell receptor (TCR) signaling plays a crucial role in various biological processes and is usually studied using global mass spectrometry‐based phosphoproteomic studies. Despite advancements in targeted mass spectrometry‐based assays for protein quantification, their application in studying signaling processes, for example, reproducible measurements of post‐translational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation, remains limited. Tyrosine phosphorylation is critical for many signaling pathways but presents challenges due to the low abundance of phosphotyrosine‐containing peptides. Conventional untargeted methods often encounter data gaps when analyzing large sample sets, particularly for low‐abundance peptides. To address this issue, a targeted proteomics method called “SureQuant” was employed, which relies on triggered data acquisition with heavy isotope‐labeled peptides. This method has been shown to provide sensitive and reproducible quantification of low‐abundance peptides. Here we describe the development of a SureQuant‐based method to quantify phosphotyrosine peptides that are involved in the TCR signaling pathway. To monitor the change in phosphotyrosine signals upon activation, the T‐cells were stimulated with anti‐CD3/CD28 antibodies. We successfully quantified changes in important phosphotyrosine peptides in primary T‐cells upon stimulation with anti‐CD3/CD28 antibodies. This study showcases the ability of the SureQuant approach to accurately quantify low‐abundance phosphotyrosine peptides, highlighting its broader potential to study a diverse set of PTMs in physiological or clinical settings. Summary T‐cell receptor (TCR) signaling plays a fundamental role in immune responses, regulating T‐cell activation, differentiation, and function. While tyrosine phosphorylation is a key regulatory mechanism in this pathway, the low abundance of phosphotyrosine peptides presents a major challenge for their detection and quantification in complex biological samples. By employing the SureQuant targeted mass spectrometry approach, we achieved highly sensitive and reproducible quantification of key phosphotyrosine sites involved in T‐cell activation. This study provides a systematic view of TCR signaling dynamics, revealing distinct phosphorylation patterns across different activation timepoints. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of SureQuant in quantifying low‐abundance, post‐translationally modified peptides, offering a valuable tool for studying signaling pathways with greater precision. Additionally, this methodological framework can be extended to investigate other signaling networks, immune cell functions, and disease‐associated phosphotyrosine modifications.

Abstract Background: Replication checkpoint modulators (RCMs), including inhibitors of CHK1, ATR, and WEE1, have been widely studied for their ability to inhibit cell cycle checkpoints and enhance the toxicity of agents that stall replication forks. In preclinical studies each of these inhibitors also demonstrates notable activity as a single agent against relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). In particular, our prior study (PMID: 33414171) demonstrated that several myeloid cell lines underwent cell death at nanomolar concentrations, with a median IC50 of 9 nM irrespective of the TP53 status. Examination of pathways involved in RCM-induced leukemia cell killing demonstrated that CHK1 inhibition induces CDC25A upregulation accompanied by activation of a death program that involves a CDK2-initiated 10- to 50-fold upregulation of TNFα and downstream engagement of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway. Here we have comprehensively characterized the processes that occur between the interruption of replication checkpoints and leukemic cell death in these sensitive cells versus cells selected for RCM resistance. Methods: Using the CHK1 inhibitors MK8776 and prexasertib, ATR inhibitors berzosertib and ceralasertib, and WEE1 inhibitor adavosertib as paradigm drugs, we examined signaling in two AML cell lines, U937 and THP.1, that were selected for CHK1 inhibitor resistance, examined cross-resistance patterns, and assessed the biochemical basis for leukemic cell death. Changes in gene expression and signaling induced by RCMs were analyzed in isogenic pairs using RNA sequencing, flow cytometry and immunoblotting. Results: In contrast to parental U937 and THP.1 cells, CHK1 inhibitor-selected U937 and THP.1 cell exhibited a lack of TNFα mRNA induction and did not undergo cell death in response to multiple CHK1 inhibitors. RNA sequencing of CHK1 inhibitor-selected AML lines revealed an almost complete absence of induction of CDK2-activated genes following prexasertib treatment. Interestingly, unlike solid tumors, AML cell lines that were resistant to CHK1 inhibitors exhibited hypersensitivity to WEE1 or ATR inhibition. Further studies demonstrated that CHK1 inhibitor response was varied in primary AML samples, with 50% of primary AML specimens resistant to CHK1i monotherapy, again without any relationship to TP53 status. The common features among sensitive vs. resistant leukemias was the successful inhibition of CDK2 phosphorylation and the associated induction of TNFα. Conclusions: Our findings reveals critical new insights into the factors that influence the response to CHK1 inhibitors in AML. Importantly, we found no evidence of cross-resistance to inhibitors of other replication checkpoint proteins, enabling alternative options. Citation Format: Annapoorna Venkatachalam, Husheng Ding, Nicole Vincelette, Cordelia McGehee, Kevin Peterson, Paula Schneider, Cristina Correia, Hu Li, Scott Kaufmann. CDK2 activation mediates response of acute myeloid leukemia to CHK1, ATR and WEE1 inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 423.

We present optimized settings for ramp times and ion mobility range in trapped ion mobility spectrometry experiments involving single cell analysis.

Abstract Background: The kinases ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated-and-Rad3-related (ATR), checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) and WEE1 participate in the response to replication stress. Inhibitors of ATR, WEE1 and CHK1 are being tested for antineoplastic activity as monotherapies and in combination with chemotherapy. Although these agents impair cell cycle checkpoints, fork stabilization, origin firing and homologous recombination (HR), little is known about the apoptotic pathways that are engaged and the critical mediators activating cell death mechanisms. The present study utilizes high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cell lines and patient derived xenografts (PDXs) to identify the primary mechanism of cell death in ovarian cancer and assess changes involved in the resistance setting after treatment with these inhibitors. Methods: A panel of HGSOC cell lines was examined for responses to ceralasertib (ATRi), prexasertib (CHK1i) or adavosertib (WEE1i) using colony forming assays, immunoblotting and assays for apoptosis. Mechanisms involved in acquired resistance and downstream changes in cell fate were evaluated by generating prexasertib-resistant HGSOC cell lines. Subsequent NGS analysis was performed in the sensitive and resistant pairs. Results: Irrespective of the homologous recombination (HR) status, ovarian cell lines and PDXs underwent cell death during prolonged exposure at clinically achievable concentrations. Treatment of ovarian cancer cell lines with ATRi, CHK1i or WEE1i activated the replication checkpoint, consistent with previously published reports. The subsequent apoptotic response involved PMAIP1 and BCL2L11 upregulation rather than the TNFa-induced death receptor-mediated apoptosis we recently described in acute leukemia (Cancer Res. PMID: 33414171). Additionally, ovarian lines selected for CHK1i resistance failed to die in response to either ATRi or WEE1i. Conclusions: Prexasertib, ceralasertib, and adavosertib exhibit monotherapy activity in both HR deficient and proficient HGSOC cell lines and PDX models. Unlike AML, death receptor mediated apoptosis was not observed; instead, the primary mechanism of cell killing in HGSOC lines involves activation of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Cross-resistance of these DNA damage repair modulators is likely multifactorial and mainly involves diminished replication stress response. Citation Format: Annapoorna Venkatachalam, Kevin L. Peterson, Cristina Correia, Karen S. Flatten, Xianon Hou, Paula A. Schneider, Emily Balczewski, Cordelia McGehee, Rachel M. Hurley, Xue W. Meng, Chance Sine, Rameen Shah, Nicole Vincelettte, Husheng Ding, Hu Li, Saravut (John) Weroha, Scott H. Kaufmann. CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib induces NOXA-dependent apoptosis in ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1832.

Abstract PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have activity in homologous recombination (HR) repair-deficient, high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC). However, even responsive tumors develop PARPi resistance, highlighting the need to delay or prevent the appearance of PARPi resistance. Here, we showed that the ALK kinase inhibitor ceritinib synergizes with PARPis by inhibiting complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, which increases production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequent induction of oxidative DNA damage that is repaired in a PARP-dependent manner. In addition, combined treatment with ceritinib and PARPi synergized in HGSOC cell lines irrespective of HR status, and a combination of ceritinib with the PARPi olaparib induced tumor regression more effectively than olaparib alone in HGSOC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Notably, the ceritinib and olaparib combination was most effective in PDX models with preexisting PARPi sensitivity and was well tolerated. These findings unveil suppression of mitochondrial respiration, accumulation of ROS, and subsequent induction of DNA damage as novel effects of ceritinib. They also suggest that the ceritinib and PARPi combination warrants further investigation as a means to enhance PARPi activity in HGSOC, particularly in tumors with preexisting HR defects. Significance: The kinase inhibitor ceritinib synergizes with PARPi to induce tumor regression in ovarian cancer models, suggesting that ceritinib combined with PARPi may be an effective strategy for treating ovarian cancer.

Abstract Although inhibitors of the kinases CHK1, ATR, and WEE1 are undergoing clinical testing, it remains unclear how these three classes of agents kill susceptible cells and whether they utilize the same cytotoxic mechanism. Here we observed that CHK1 inhibition induces apoptosis in a subset of acute leukemia cell lines in vitro, including TP53-null acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and BCR/ABL–positive acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), and inhibits leukemic colony formation in clinical AML samples ex vivo. In further studies, downregulation or inhibition of CHK1 triggered signaling in sensitive human acute leukemia cell lines that involved CDK2 activation followed by AP1-dependent TNF transactivation, TNFα production, and engagement of a TNFR1- and BID-dependent apoptotic pathway. AML lines that were intrinsically resistant to CHK1 inhibition exhibited high CHK1 expression and were sensitized by CHK1 downregulation. Signaling through this same CDK2–AP1–TNF cytotoxic pathway was also initiated by ATR or WEE1 inhibitors in vitro and during CHK1 inhibitor treatment of AML xenografts in vivo. Collectively, these observations not only identify new contributors to the antileukemic cell action of CHK1, ATR, and WEE1 inhibitors, but also delineate a previously undescribed pathway leading from aberrant CDK2 activation to death ligand–induced killing that can potentially be exploited for acute leukemia treatment. Significance: This study demonstrates that replication checkpoint inhibitors can kill AML cells through a pathway involving AP1-mediated TNF gene activation and subsequent TP53-independent, TNFα-induced apoptosis, which can potentially be exploited clinically.

Abstract Abstract 287 Purpose: Farnesyltransferases are key cellular enzymes involved in the prenylation of proteins. Prenylated proteins are important for malignant cell growth. The purpose of this phase II study (NCT00082888) was to assess tumor response and toxicity associated with the oral farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (R115777, Johnson and Johnson) in patients with relapsed aggressive, indolent, or uncommon lymphoma. The uncommon group included low incidence lymphoma types such as Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma- cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Patients and Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin (NHL) or Hodgkin (HL) were eligible if they had measurable disease, performance status ≤2, platelet count ≥75,000 × 10(6)/L, an absolute neutrophil count ≥1000 × 10(6)/L and a creatinine ≤2 × upper limit of normal. Patients initially received tipifarnib 300 mg twice daily, days 1–21 every 28 days. The trial was conducted by the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE. Results: Ninety-three patients with lymphoma (42 aggressive, 15 indolent, and 36 uncommon) enrolled in the trial between March 2004 and November 2008. The median age was 62 years (range, 18–91). The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 1–17). The overall response rate (ORR) was 20% (19/93) with 6% (6/93) complete responses (CR) and 14% (13/93) partial responses (PR). The ORR was 17%, 7%, and 31% for the aggressive, indolent, and uncommon groups, respectively (Table). Among the 19 responders were 7 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 7 T-cell NHL, 1 follicular grade II, and 4 HL. The overall median response duration for the 19 responders was 7.5 months (mean, 12.8; range, 1.8 – 48.1 months). The median response duration was 11.3 months (mean, 10.1; range, 1.8 – 18.5 months), 2 months, and 7.5 months (mean, 15.5; range, 1.9 – 48.1 months) for the aggressive (7), indolent (1), and uncommon (11) groups, respectively. Five patients in the uncommon group are still receiving treatment with a range of treatment duration between 25 – 60+ months. Among the 5 still receiving treatment 4 responded and 1 is stable. The range of response duration is 15.4, 17.7, 43.1, and 48.1 months. These five patients (2 with HL, 1 anaplastic large cell cutaneous, and 2 PTCL) are currently receiving doses of 400 (1), 200 (2), and 100 (2) mg twice daily. The median time to progression for all patients was 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.1 – 4.5 months). The grade 3,4 toxicities observed were primarily fatigue (10%) and reversible myelosuppression with 11% anemia, 37% neutropenia, and 32% thrombocytopenia. Correlative studies demonstrated tipifarnib-induced upregulation of Bim, a marker of tipifarnib action in lymphoma cell lines, in 7 of 9 paired lymphoma biopsies. Conclusions: Tipifarnib has activity in lymphoma, with responses in patients with heavily pretreated DLBCL, HL and T-cell types, but little activity in follicular NHL. This agent has an excellent toxicity profile and targets a novel pathway. Further studies in combination with other agents are warranted for patients with DLBCL, HL or T-cell NHL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.