Ghiaur, Gabriel

Abstract DAC combinations serve as frontline therapies for AML. DAC forms DNA-DNMT1 crosslinks and activates the ATR-CHK1-WEE1 DDR. Combinations of DNA-protein crosslinking agents with ATR, CHK1, or WEE1 inhibitors (i) have shown efficacy in solid tumors. This study evaluates the cytotoxic synergy of DAC plus ATRi, CHK1i, or WEE1i in AML. Public datasets were queried for mRNA expression and dependency. Commercial cell lines (U937, KG1a, Molm13, MV-4-11) were genomically validated. Molm13 TP53-/- clones were generated via CRISPR. Cells were cultured in complete RPMI. To treat, cells were cultured for 48 h in RPMI with drugs or diluent (0.2% v/v DMSO). Protein expression was evaluated by Western blotting (WB). Apoptosis was assayed by flow cytometry with annexin V or propidium iodide. Primary AML samples were obtained at study centers after informed consent. Isolated mononuclear cells (Ficoll) were used in colony forming unit (CFU) assays with DMSO or drug for 12-16 days. Synergy was determined by median-effect (CalcuSyn) where a combination index <1 is synergistic and >1 antagonistic. DNMT1 expression (TCGA) was highest in AML vs all other tumor types (p<0.001). In CRISPR screens (DepMap), AML cell lines were increasingly dependent on DNMT1, ATR, CHK1, and WEE1 (ANOVA p<0.001). WB of AML cell lines treated with DAC (25 - 200 nM) for 24 h showed phosphorylations of H2AX and CHK1 S296/S345 that were most pronounced in TP53MT lines. In apoptosis assays, ATRi, CHK1i, and WEE1i were synergistic with clinical concentrations of DAC (Table 1). In isogenic Molm13 lines, TP53 loss conferred DAC resistance that was overcome with combination treatment. Selective CHK1i were generally more synergistic than CHK1/2i, consistent with a CHK1 DDR. CFU assays of primary AML samples also showed synergy between DAC and ATRi, CHK1i, and especially WEE1i. Table 1. Synergy between decitabine and replication checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical models of AML. Cell line data are derived from subdiploid apoptosis assays. U937 data were replicated using annexin V. Prexasertib showed no activity in KG1a cells (suggesting drug efflux) requiring the use of the alternate CHK1 inhibitor, rabusertib. Abbreviations: ATR, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related; CHK1/2, checkpoint kinase 1 and/or 2; CI, combination index; Conc, concentration; DNMT1, DNA methylatransferase 1; IQR, interquartile range; MT, mutated; ND, not determined; SD, standard deviation; WT, wild type. Drug Target Conc. (nM) Molm13 (TP53WT) Molm13 (TP53-/-) U937 (TP53G187fs*/-) KG1a (TP53V225fs*/-) Primary AML (TP53WT orTP53MT) Units Decitabine DNMT1 6.25 – 200 25 ± 11 350 ± 260 310 ± 180 6.1 ± 1.6 ND EC50, nM (mean, SD) Ceralasertib ATR 250 – 500 0.93 (0.66 – 1.24) 0.90 (0.84 – 0.96) 0.15 (0.08 – 0.21) 0.74 (0.63 – 1.02) 0.66 (0.43 – 2.43) CI with decitabine (median, IQR) Camonsertib ATR 10 – 100 0.27 (0.19 – 0.59) 0.24 (0.22 – 0.34) 0.34 (0.21 – 0.39) ND ND Prexasertib CHK1/2 1.0 – 6.0 0.89 (0.82 – 1.06) 0.78 (0.68 – 0.90) 0.95 (0.93 – 1.08) ND 0.88 (0.29 – 1.28) MK-8776 CHK1 250 – 1, 000 0.57 (0.48 – 0.80) 0.76 (0.73 – 1.19) 0.89 (0.57 – 1.39) ND ND Rabusertib CHK1 600 – 1, 000 ND ND ND 0.51 (0.48 – 0.56) ND Adavosertib WEE1 100 – 400 0.70 (0.63 – 1.11) 0.99 (0.78 – 1.14) 0.67 (0.60 – 0.74) 0.67 (0.37 – 0.93) 0.65 (0.43 – 0.88) DAC synergizes with ATRi, CHK1i, and WEE1i in AML. Future work will test these combinations in vivo and incorporate BH3 mimetics. Citation Format: Clifford M. Csizmar, Antoine N. Saliba, Olivia K. Rossman, Kevin L. Peterson, X. Wei Meng, B. Douglas Smith, Gabriel Ghiaur, Jonathan A. Webster, Mrinal M. Patnaik, Aref Al-Kali, Scott H. Kaufmann. Decitabine (DAC) induces a DNA damage response (DDR) and synergizes with replication checkpoint inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1170.

Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with mutated TP53 (TP53MT) is resistant to chemotherapy and has a poor prognosis. Prior reports suggest that DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi), such as decitabine and azacitidine, form covalent DNA-DNMT1 adducts and invoke a DNA damage response (DDR) characterized by activation of the ATR-CHK1 pathway, including in TP53MT AML samples. This study evaluates whether decitabine exhibits cytotoxic synergy with replication checkpoint modulators (ATRi, CHK1/2i, WEE1i) in pre-clinical models of AML. Methods Parental cell lines (U937, KG1a, Molm13, MV-4-11) were obtained commercially and genomically validated. The Molm13 TP53-/- cell line was generated via CRISPR/Cas9 knockout. Cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics at 37 ºC, 5% CO2. Decitabine, ceralasertib (ATRi), prexasertib (CHK1/2i), MK-8776 (CHK1i), and adavosertib (WEE1i) were reconstituted at 10 mM in DMSO. For drug treatments, cells were cultured for 48 h in medium with 0.2% (v/v) DMSO or drug. Western blots were stained with commercial antibodies followed by peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies and imaged by chemiluminescence. Apoptosis assays were performed via flow cytometry (BD FACSCanto II) with annexin V-APC (BD Biosciences) and/or propidium iodide (Sigma) staining. Peripheral blood and bone marrow samples were obtained from AML patients after informed consent at Mayo Clinic and Johns Hopkins University. Mononuclear cells were isolated via Histopaque-1077 (Sigma) centrifugation and used immediately. Colony forming assays were performed in Methocult H4435 (Stem Cell Technologies) supplemented with vehicle or drug; leukemic colonies were counted after 12-16 days. Combination indices (CI) were determined by the Chou-Talalay method (CalcuSyn) where values <1 indicate synergy and >1 antagonism. This work was supported in part by R01 CA289285. Results Western blots of TP53MT AML cell lines (U937, KG1a) and primary samples treated with decitabine (≤200 nM) for 24 h demonstrated increased phosphorylation of H2AX and S296/S345 CHK1, consistent with activation of the ATR-CHK1 DDR pathway. These changes were less pronounced in TP53 wild type cell lines (Molm13, MV-4-11). In subdiploid (SubG1) assays, U937 cells exhibited resistance to monotherapy with decitabine (EC50 = 330 ± 200 nM) and variable sensitivity to ceralasertib (250 - 500 nM), prexasertib (1 - 10 nM), MK-8776 (250 - 1,000 nM), and adavosertib (50 - 400 nM). When combined, however, marked synergy was observed between decitabine and both ceralasertib (mean CI 0.15) and adavosertib (CI 0.59). Synergy was also observed with the selective CHK1i, MK-8776 (CI 0.56), but less-so with the dual CHK1/2i, prexasertib (CI 0.93), consistent with the hypothesis of an ATR-CHK1 DNA damage response. Similar results were obtained from decitabine (EC50 = 300 ± 100 nM) and ceralasertib (CI 0.54), adavosertib (CI 0.67), MK-8776 (CI 0.52), and prexasertib (CI 0.81) in annexin V assays. These combinations were further evaluated (SubG1 assays) in an isogenic pair of Molm13 and Molm13 TP53-/- cell lines. In Molm13 cells, decitabine (EC50 = 23 ± 11 nM) was again synergistic with adavosertib (CI 0.60), but not ceralasertib (CI 1.3) or prexasertib (CI 1.2). In Molm13 TP53-/- cells, however, very little synergy was observed between decitabine (EC50 = 53 ± 22 nM) and ceralasertib (CI 1.5), prexasertib (CI 4.3), or adavosertib (CI 1.0) except for at higher concentrations of adavosertib (400 nM, CI 0.89). Thus, while biallelic TP53 inactivation conferred resistance to DNMTi and checkpoint inhibitors, the degree of resistance was context-dependent and could be partially overcome by WEE1 inhibition. The combinations of decitabine with ceralasertib (n = 2), prexasertib (n = 4), or adavosertib (n = 3) were evaluated in colony forming assays using primary AML samples from newly-diagnosed patients with diverse clinicomolecular profiles. Combination treatment was antagonistic with ceralasertib (CI 2.2), additive with prexasertib (CI 1.0), and synergistic with adavosertib (CI 0.88). Conclusions In multiple cell lines and diverse primary AML samples, decitabine activated the ATR-CHK1 DDR pathway and synergized with ATRi, CHK1/2i, and WEE1i. Amongst these, only the combination of decitabine plus adavosertib exhibited synergy across all three models, highlighting WEE1 as a potential target in TP53MT AML.

Abstract Although inhibitors of the kinases CHK1, ATR, and WEE1 are undergoing clinical testing, it remains unclear how these three classes of agents kill susceptible cells and whether they utilize the same cytotoxic mechanism. Here we observed that CHK1 inhibition induces apoptosis in a subset of acute leukemia cell lines in vitro, including TP53-null acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and BCR/ABL–positive acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), and inhibits leukemic colony formation in clinical AML samples ex vivo. In further studies, downregulation or inhibition of CHK1 triggered signaling in sensitive human acute leukemia cell lines that involved CDK2 activation followed by AP1-dependent TNF transactivation, TNFα production, and engagement of a TNFR1- and BID-dependent apoptotic pathway. AML lines that were intrinsically resistant to CHK1 inhibition exhibited high CHK1 expression and were sensitized by CHK1 downregulation. Signaling through this same CDK2–AP1–TNF cytotoxic pathway was also initiated by ATR or WEE1 inhibitors in vitro and during CHK1 inhibitor treatment of AML xenografts in vivo. Collectively, these observations not only identify new contributors to the antileukemic cell action of CHK1, ATR, and WEE1 inhibitors, but also delineate a previously undescribed pathway leading from aberrant CDK2 activation to death ligand–induced killing that can potentially be exploited for acute leukemia treatment. Significance: This study demonstrates that replication checkpoint inhibitors can kill AML cells through a pathway involving AP1-mediated TNF gene activation and subsequent TP53-independent, TNFα-induced apoptosis, which can potentially be exploited clinically.