Flanagan, Eoin P.

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG‐IgG) testing. Methods We retrospectively identified patients for CSF MOG‐IgG testing from January 1, 1996, to May 1, 2023, at Mayo Clinic and other medical centers that sent CSF MOG‐IgG for testing including: controls, 282; serum MOG‐IgG positive MOG antibody‐associated disease (MOGAD), 74; serum MOG‐IgG negative high‐risk phenotypes, 73; serum false positive MOG‐IgG with alternative diagnoses, 18. A live cell‐based assay assessed CSF MOG‐IgG positivity (IgG‐binding‐index [IBI], ≥2.5) using multiple anti‐human secondary antibodies and end‐titers were calculated if sufficient sample volume. Correlation of CSF MOG‐IgG IBI and titer was assessed. Results The pan‐IgG Fc‐specific secondary was optimal, yielding CSF MOG‐IgG sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 98% (Youden's index 0.88). CSF MOG‐IgG was positive in: 4/282 (1.4%) controls; 66/74 (89%) serum MOG‐IgG positive MOGAD patients; and 9/73 (12%) serum MOG‐IgG negative patients with high‐risk phenotypes. Serum negative but CSF positive MOG‐IgG accounted for 9/83 (11%) MOGAD patients, and all fulfilled 2023 MOGAD diagnostic criteria. Subgroup analysis of serum MOG‐IgG low‐positives revealed CSF MOG‐IgG positivity more in MOGAD (13/16[81%]) than other diseases with false positive serum MOG‐IgG (3/15[20%]) ( p = 0.01). CSF MOG‐IgG IBI and CSF MOG‐IgG titer (both available in 29 samples) were correlated (Spearman's r = 0.64, p < 0.001). Interpretation CSF MOG‐IgG testing has diagnostic utility in patients with a suspicious phenotype but negative serum MOG‐IgG, and those with low positive serum MOG‐IgG results and diagnostic uncertainty. These findings support a role for CSF MOG‐IgG testing in the appropriate clinical setting. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:34–45

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to provide a comprehensive review of neuroimaging characteristics and corresponding clinical phenotypes of autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy (GFAP‐A), a rare but severe neuroinflammatory disorder, to facilitate early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Methods A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis)‐conforming systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed on all available data from January 2016 to June 2023. Clinical and neuroimaging phenotypes were extracted for both adult and paediatric forms. Results A total of 93 studies with 681 cases (55% males; median age = 46, range = 1–103 years) were included. Of these, 13 studies with a total of 535 cases were eligible for the meta‐analysis. Clinically, GFAP‐A was often preceded by a viral prodromal state (45% of cases) and manifested as meningitis, encephalitis, and/or myelitis. The most common symptoms were headache, fever, and movement disturbances. Coexisting autoantibodies (45%) and neoplasms (18%) were relatively frequent. Corticosteroid treatment resulted in partial/complete remission in a majority of cases (83%). Neuroimaging often revealed T2/fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensities (74%) as well as perivascular (45%) and/or leptomeningeal (30%) enhancement. Spinal cord abnormalities were also frequent (49%), most commonly manifesting as longitudinally extensive myelitis. There were 88 paediatric cases; they had less prominent neuroimaging findings with lower frequencies of both T2/FLAIR hyperintensities (38%) and contrast enhancement (19%). Conclusions This systematic review and meta‐analysis provide high‐level evidence for clinical and imaging phenotypes of GFAP‐A, which will benefit the identification and clinical workup of suspected cases. Differential diagnostic cues to distinguish GFAP‐A from common clinical and imaging mimics are provided as well as suitable magnetic resonance imaging protocol recommendations.

ImportanceRapid and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis encourages prompt initiation of immunotherapy toward improved patient outcomes. However, clinical features alone may not sufficiently narrow the differential diagnosis, and awaiting autoantibody results can delay immunotherapy.ObjectiveTo identify simple magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics that accurately distinguish 2 common forms of autoimmune encephalitis, LGI1- and CASPR2-antibody encephalitis (LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E), from 2 major differential diagnoses, viral encephalitis (VE) and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study involved a retrospective, blinded analysis of the first available brain MRIs (taken 2000-2022) from 192 patients at Oxford University Hospitals in the UK and Mayo Clinic in the US. These patients had LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E, VE, or CJD as evaluated by 2 neuroradiologists (discovery cohort; n = 87); findings were validated in an independent cohort by 3 neurologists (n = 105). Groups were statistically compared with contingency tables. Data were analyzed in 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMRI findings including T2 or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensities, swelling or volume loss, presence of gadolinium contrast enhancement, and diffusion-weighted imaging changes. Correlations with clinical features.ResultsAmong 192 participants with MRIs reviewed, 71 were female (37%) and 121 were male (63%); the median age was 66 years (range, 19-92 years). By comparison with VE and CJD, in LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E, T2 and/or FLAIR hyperintensities were less likely to extend outside the temporal lobe (3/42 patients [7%] vs 17/18 patients [94%] with VE; P &amp;lt; .001, and 3/4 patients [75%] with CJD; P = .005), less frequently exhibited swelling (12/55 [22%] with LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E vs 13/22 [59%] with VE; P = .003), and showed no diffusion restriction (0 patients vs 16/22 [73%] with VE and 8/10 [80%] with CJD; both P &amp;lt; .001) and rare contrast enhancement (1/20 [5%] vs 7/17 [41%] with VE; P = .01). These findings were validated in an independent cohort and generated an area under the curve of 0.97, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 95% among cases with T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in the hippocampus and/or amygdala.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, T2 and/or FLAIR hyperintensities confined to the temporal lobes, without diffusion restriction or contrast enhancement, robustly distinguished LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E from key differential diagnoses. These observations should assist clinical decision-making toward expediting immunotherapy. Their generalizability to other forms of autoimmune encephalitis and VE should be examined in future studies.

AbstractBackground and purposeParaneoplastic neurological autoimmunity is well described with small‐cell lung cancer, but information is limited for other neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).MethodsAdult patients with histopathologically confirmed non‐pulmonary NENs, neurological autoimmunity within 5 years of NEN diagnosis, and neural antibody testing performed at the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory (January 2008 to March 2023) were retrospectively identified. Control sera were available from patients with NENs without neurological autoimmunity (116).ResultsThirty‐four patients were identified (median age 68 years, range 31–87). The most common primary tumor sites were pancreas (nine), skin (Merkel cell, eight), small bowel/duodenum (seven), and unknown (seven). Five patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy before symptom onset; symptoms preceded cancer diagnosis in 62.1% of non‐ICI‐treated patients. The most frequent neurological phenotypes (non‐ICI‐treated) were movement disorders (12; cerebellar ataxia in 10), dysautonomia (six), peripheral neuropathy (eight), encephalitis (four), and neuromuscular junction disorders (four). Neural antibodies were detected in 55.9% of patients studied (most common specificities: P/Q‐type voltage‐gated calcium channel [seven], muscle‐type acetylcholine receptor [three], anti‐neuronal nuclear antibody type 1 [three], and neuronal intermediate filaments [two]), but in only 6.9% of controls. Amongst patients receiving cancer or immunosuppressive therapy, 51.6% had partial or complete recovery. Outcomes were unfavorable in 48.3% (non‐ICI‐treated) and neural autoantibody positivity was associated with poor neurological outcome.DiscussionNeurological autoimmunity associated with non‐pulmonary NENs is often multifocal and can be treatment responsive, underscoring the importance of rapid recognition and early treatment.

AbstractRecent studies have reported the involvement of peripheral nervous system (PNS) in association with MOG‐IgG, including isolated neuropathies. In this retrospective study we characterized the PNS involvement in MOG antibody associated disease (MOGAD). Six out of 215 MOGAD patients had PNS involvement (all polyradiculopathy) that occurred concurrently with a CNS demyelinating episode. We also demonstrated MOG expression in healthy human controls' proximal nerve root. Nine patients with true‐positive MOG‐IgG1 had PNS involvement temporally unrelated to a CNS demyelinating event. All these patients had an alternate etiology of PNS involvement. Isolated peripheral neuropathy is not a feature of MOGAD, but inflammatory nerve root involvement can occur concurrently with CNS demyelinating events.

This Viewpoint discusses how neural antibody–based diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis would complement the syndrome-based diagnostic algorithm to improve sensitivity while maintaining high specificity.