Mundi, Manpreet S.

AbstractThe dual burden of undernutrition and overnutrition requires a greater understanding and commitment to physician training and specialization in nutrition support. Despite the significant healthcare need and existence of organizations focused on nutrition support such as the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), physician involvement in the nutrition care of high‐risk patients remains low. In an ASPEN survey of members, inadequate training among physicians was reported along with significant barriers to involvement in nutrition support, such as insufficient protected time, reduced reimbursement and financial support, inadequate support from administrators or supervisors, as well as a nationwide reduction in number of nutrition support teams. These changes in the healthcare landscape prompted the ASPEN Physician Engagement Committee to develop a critical review focused on domains of nutrition risk assessment, enteral and parenteral access and support, scholarly activities, board certification, administrative responsibilities, education and training opportunities, coding, and reimbursement. The aim of this critical review is to capacitate physicians to engage in nutrition support and enhance their acumen in clinical nutrition to improve patient care and enrich personal and professional development.

Purpose of review This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the expanding role of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) beyond glycemic control, particularly in the context of critical illness. With growing recognition of their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and organ-protective properties, GLP-1RAs show promise in managing complications such as sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute kidney injury, and multiorgan dysfunction. This review explores their mechanisms across vital systems – including cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, neuropsychiatric, and gut-lung-microbiome axes – highlighting preclinical and clinical data. By consolidating emerging findings, this review aims to inform future translational research and support the integration of GLP-1RAs into critical care strategies. Recent findings Recent evidence highlights GLP-1RAs as promising adjuncts in critical illness due to their multiorgan protective effects. In cardiovascular systems, GLP-1RAs improve endothelial function, reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury, and modulate autonomic tone. In the CNS, they provide neuroprotection by reducing neuroinflammation and pyroptosis. In the lungs, they attenuate ARDS by decreasing cytokine production, enhancing surfactant secretion, and restoring alveolar-capillary integrity. Renally, they reduce acute injury and preserve filtration function. In the gut, GLP-1RAs modulate the microbiome, enhance barrier integrity, and lower systemic inflammation via the gut-lung axis. Additionally, they reduce hepatic inflammation and support pancreatic beta-cell survival, improving insulin sensitivity and metabolic stability in critical care. Summary GLP-1 receptor agonists hold promise as multiorgan protective agents in critical illness, offering benefits beyond glucose control. Their anti-inflammatory, metabolic, and vaso-protective properties may be harnessed to prevent or attenuate organ failure, support recovery, and improve long-term outcomes in critically ill patients. Further clinical trials are warranted to define their safety, efficacy, and optimal application across ICU populations.

AbstractEndoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an effective treatment for obesity but typically is not covered by insurance. It is not known whether patients with financial investment in their endoscopic procedure are more likely to achieve and/or maintain weight loss as compared with those who have no financial buy-in. We aimed to compare treatment adherence and outcomes between patients paying out-of-pocket (OOP) and those who underwent ESG as part of any clinical trial where costs were covered by a study protocol (no payment; NP).Data were collected via retrospective chart review. One hundred sixty-four patients who had an ESG with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Repeated measures with generalized linear model were used to evaluate weight loss at different time points after ESG and labs values at baseline and 1-year follow-up to assess for comorbidity improvement between cohorts. Compliance was evaluated by comparing exercise adherence rates.The pattern of weight loss and change in laboratory values was not different over time between the OOP group (n = 139) and NP group (n = 25). Patients lost an average of 14% (12.2–15.9) and 12.9% (9.3–16.5) of total body weight over all time points, respectively, in both groups (6, 12 and 24 months). Treatment adherence also did not differ between the groups.Having “skin in the game” by paying for ESG OOP does not correlate with better outcomes or treatment adherence, which further supports broad insurance coverage for this procedure.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms can potentially enhance clinical decision-making (CDM) in primary care settings. OpenEvidence (OE), an AI tool, draws from trusted sources to generate evidence-based medicine (EBM) recommendations to address clinical questions. However, its effectiveness in real-world primary care cases remains unknown. Objective: To evaluate the performance of OE in providing EBM recommendations for five common chronic conditions in primary care: hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus type 2, depression, and obesity. Methods: Five patient cases were retrospectively analyzed. Physicians posed specific clinical questions, and OE responses were evaluated on clarity, relevance, evidence support, impact on CDM, and overall satisfaction. Four independent physicians provided ratings using a 0 to 4 scale. Results: OE provided accurate, evidence-based recommendations in all cases, aligning with physician plans. OE was scored on a scale of zero to four, where zero was very unclear, and four was very clear. Mean scores across cases were clarity (3.55 ± 0.60), relevance (3.75 ± 0.44), support (3.35 ± 0.49), and satisfaction (3.60 ± 0.60). However, the impact on CDM was limited (1.95 ± 1.05), as OE primarily reinforced rather than modified plans. Conclusion: OE was rated high in clarity, relevance, and evidence-based support, reinforcing physician decisions in common chronic conditions. While the impact on CDM was minimal due to the study’s retrospective nature, OE shows promise in augmenting the primary care physician. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate its utility in complex cases and multidisciplinary settings.

Abstract Background The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) introduced an approach for malnutrition diagnosis in 2019 that comprised screening followed by assessment of three phenotypic criteria (weight loss, low body mass index [BMI], and low muscle mass) and two etiologic criteria (reduced food intake/assimilation and inflammation/disease burden). This planned update reconsiders the GLIM framework based on published knowledge and experience over the past 5 years. Methods A working group ( n = 43 members) conducted a literature search spanning 2019–2024 using the keywords “Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition or GLIM.” Prior GLIM guidance activities for using the criteria on muscle mass and inflammation were reviewed. Successive rounds of revision and review were used to achieve consensus. Results More than 400 scientific reports were published in peer‐reviewed journals, forming the basis of 10 systematic reviews, some including meta‐analyses of GLIM validity that indicate strong construct and predictive validity. Limitations and future priorities are discussed. Working group findings suggest that assessment of low muscle mass should be guided by experience and available technological resources. Clinical judgment may suffice to evaluate the inflammation/disease burden etiologic criterion. No revisions of the weight loss, low BMI, or reduced food intake/assimilation criteria are suggested. After two rounds of review and revision, the working group secured 100% agreement with the conclusions reported in the 5‐year update. Conclusion Ongoing initiatives target priorities that include malnutrition risk screening procedures, GLIM adaptation to the intensive care setting, assessment in support of the reduced food intake/assimilation criterion, and determination of malnutrition in obesity.

Abstract Introduction Despite the widespread use of telemedicine to assess patients with intestinal failure (IF) receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN), satisfaction with remote consultation methods has not been comprehensively assessed. Here, we assessed patient and clinician attitudes to telephone and video IF consultations. Methods Telemedicine questionnaires were designed and distributed in paper form to patients with IF receiving HPN under the care of a UK national IF reference center and electronically to IF clinicians in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand. Results Seventy‐eight patients (53 women and 25 men) and 110 clinicians agreed to complete the questionnaires. Sixty seven percent of patients who had telephone consultations and 50% of patients who had video consultations were satisfied with their consultations. Forty nine percent and 83% of patients who had telephone and video consultations, respectively, felt they were of the same standard as their face‐to‐face consultations. Despite 60% of clinicians feeling telemedicine training would be useful, 55% of clinicians stated they mostly or always met all of the needs of their patients via telephone consultations, whereas 96% of clinicians felt similarly for video consultations ( P = 0.002). A total of 33% and 57% of clinicians felt telephone and video consultations, respectively, were of the same standard as face‐to‐face consultations ( P = 0.004). Conclusion This study comprehensively assesses attitudes to IF telemedicine consultations. Our data show that a large proportion of patients and clinicians are satisfied with IF telephone and video consultations. However, there is an unmet need amongst clinicians for telemedicine training.

Objective: To develop and validate 2 predictive models, the Diabetes Remission Index (DRI) and the Weight loss–adjusted DRI (W-DRI), for assessing type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Background: MBS, including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, is highly effective in achieving T2D remission, but outcomes vary across populations. Predicting remission remains critical for individualized patient care and optimizing surgical outcomes. Existing tools focus on general outcomes, and a specific model incorporating weight loss data has been lacking. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with T2D and overweight/obesity (body mass index: ≥27 kg/m 2 ) who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between 2008 and 2018. Institution 1 (I-1) data (n = 503) were used to develop and internally validate the models, whereas Institution 2 (I-2) data (n = 409) were used for external validation. The DRI model incorporated preoperative variables, and the W-DRI model, in addition, included postsurgical weight loss. Predictive accuracy was assessed using area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve [area under the curve (AUC)], calibration plots, and stratified analyses. Results: In I-1, 44.7% of patients achieved T2D remission, with a DRI model AUC of 0.80. In I-2, 52.6% achieved remission, with a model AUC of 0.78. Incorporating weight loss improved W-DRI predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.82 in I-1, 0.79 in I-2). Calibration plots demonstrated strong agreement between predicted and observed remission rates. An online DRI and W-DRI calculator is available through the Mayo Clinic webpage (https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/dri-calculator/). Conclusions: The DRI and W-DRI models accurately predict T2D remission post-MBS, enabling personalized patient care and informed decision-making. Further validation across diverse populations is warranted.

Purpose of review Once considered to have only local influences on the gut mucosa, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) now appear to have a much wider anti-inflammatory, immune-modulating, systemic effect. This article reviews recent evidence to suggest a much wider clinical application of this valued dietary substrate. Recent findings SCFAs act systemically through stimulation of G protein receptors (GPRs) and inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDACs). SCFAs cause appetite suppression, reduce systemic inflammation, improve insulin sensitivity, increase energy expenditure, promote mitochondrial function, stimulate satiety, reduce blood pressure, and improve cognitive function from various neurologic maladies. Summary Dietary strategies should be implemented to provide this beneficial substrate across a wide spectrum of disease conditions. Use of prebiotic fiber or liquid supplements containing high SCFA-producing organisms should be considered as therapeutic targets for multiple metabolic, immunologic, and neurodegenerative diseases.

Objectives: To identify patient characteristics, health concerns, and barriers to care based on overweight or obesity. Methods: A 50-question anonymous survey was administered to patients. Data were compared by body mass index (BMI). Results: Among 3976 distributed surveys, 899 were returned and 682 were analyzed. Most respondents were women (60%), White (94%), and married/partnered (65%) and had some college education (80%). Younger and unmarried persons had higher BMI ( P < .001). Concern for quality of life ( P < .001) and importance of lifestyle changes ( P = .006) increased with BMI, but confidence in making changes decreased as BMI increased ( P < .001). Perceived good health decreased with increasing BMI ( P < .001), whereas depression and other comorbid conditions increased. Self-esteem decreased and stigma increased with higher BMI (both P < .001). Weight discussions with clinicians ( P < .001) and belief that clinicians should be involved in weight management ( P = .002) increased with BMI, yet self-perception of being judged by clinicians also increased ( P < .001). As BMI increased, delays in seeking health care increased ( P < .001). Conclusions: This survey study highlights perceived health concerns and barriers to care among persons with overweight and obesity. With higher BMI, self-esteem decreased, and stigma, self-perception of poor health, perception of being judged by clinicians, and delay in seeking medical care increased.

AbstractThe role of long‐term parenteral support in patients with underlying benign conditions who do not have intestinal failure (IF) is contentious, not least since there are clear benefits in utilising the oral or enteral route for nutritional support. Furthermore, the risks of long‐term home parenteral nutrition (HPN) are significant, with significant impacts on morbidity and mortality. There has, however, been a recent upsurge of the use of HPN in patients with conditions such as gastro‐intestinal neuromuscular disorders, opioid bowel dysfunction, disorders of gut–brain interaction and possibly eating disorders, who do not have IF. As a result, the European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), the European Society of Neuro‐gastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) and the Rome Foundation for Disorders of Gut Brain Interaction felt that a position statement is required to clarify – and hopefully reduce the potential for harm associated with – the use of long‐term parenteral support in patients without IF. Consensus opinion is that HPN should not be prescribed for patients without IF, where the oral and/or enteral route can be utilised. On the rare occasions that PN commencement is required to treat life‐threatening malnutrition in conditions such as those listed above, it should only be prescribed for a time‐limited period to achieve nutritional safety, while the wider multi‐disciplinary team focus on more appropriate biopsychosocial holistic and rehabilitative approaches to manage the patient's primary underlying condition.