Mosleh, Kamal Abi

Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an established treatment for severe obesity and its related comorbidities. While long-term outcomes are often emphasized, early postoperative complications remain a critical metric of safety and resource utilization. Large database studies have reported national trends in MBS outcomes but are limited by lack of granularity, inconsistent definitions, and inclusion of heterogeneous surgical experience. This study aimed to provide a detailed analysis of 30-day postoperative complications following sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and duodenal switch (DS) over a 17-year period at a single high-volume quaternary academic center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent primary laparoscopic SG, RYGB, or DS between 2008 and 2024. All procedures were performed by fellowship-trained, minimally invasive bariatric surgeons. Complications occurring within 30 days postoperatively were identified through comprehensive chart review and classified using the Clavien-Dindo grading system. Primary outcomes included incidence, severity, and type of complications, as well as rates of readmission, reoperation, and reintervention. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of overall and major complications. Results: Of 2190 patients included, 413 (18.9%) experienced at least 1 early complication, totaling 467 discrete events. DS had the highest complication rate (29.3%), followed by RYGB (18.4%) and SG (17.5%). RYGB was associated with a high burden of major complications, including anastomotic strictures, GI bleeding, and reoperations for obstruction or leak. The 30-day rates of readmission (2.0%) and reoperation (1.3%) were low across all groups. Independent predictors of major complications included venous stasis (aOR=3.22), renal insufficiency (aOR=2.65), and type 2 diabetes (aOR=1.96); both RYGB (aOR=2.25) and DS (aOR=2.77) carried higher risk than SG. Conclusion: This study provides a granular, procedure-specific profile of early complications after SG, RYGB, and DS. While all 3 procedures demonstrated acceptable safety profiles, DS had the highest overall complication rate, and RYGB carried the greatest burden of major complications. These findings underscore the variability in early postoperative outcomes by procedure type and reflect the value of institutional experience in characterizing complication profiles.

Obesity is a major global health challenge associated with significant metabolic and gastrointestinal comorbidities. While metabolic and bariatric surgery remains the gold standard for durable weight loss, the desire for additional options has fueled the development of endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) as another tool for weight loss. This review examines established EBTs, including endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), intragastric balloons (IGBs), and transoral outlet reduction (TORe), alongside emerging therapies such as duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR), incisionless anastomosis creation, and fully automated endoscopic gastric remodeling systems. ESG has demonstrated durable weight loss, favorable safety, and superior cost-effectiveness compared to pharmacotherapy alone, while combination strategies using EBTs and anti-obesity medications (AOMs), particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists, have resulted in greater total-body weight loss than either modality alone. Genetic variation, particularly within the leptin–melanocortin pathway, may predict response to endoscopic interventions and guide personalized treatment selection. Novel investigational procedures such as DMR, automated or robotic gastric remodeling, and magnetic or ultrasound-assisted gastric bypass show promising early results. Endoscopic therapies are poised to become increasingly central to the personalized, scalable management of obesity and related metabolic diseases.

AbstractEndoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an effective treatment for obesity but typically is not covered by insurance. It is not known whether patients with financial investment in their endoscopic procedure are more likely to achieve and/or maintain weight loss as compared with those who have no financial buy-in. We aimed to compare treatment adherence and outcomes between patients paying out-of-pocket (OOP) and those who underwent ESG as part of any clinical trial where costs were covered by a study protocol (no payment; NP).Data were collected via retrospective chart review. One hundred sixty-four patients who had an ESG with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Repeated measures with generalized linear model were used to evaluate weight loss at different time points after ESG and labs values at baseline and 1-year follow-up to assess for comorbidity improvement between cohorts. Compliance was evaluated by comparing exercise adherence rates.The pattern of weight loss and change in laboratory values was not different over time between the OOP group (n = 139) and NP group (n = 25). Patients lost an average of 14% (12.2–15.9) and 12.9% (9.3–16.5) of total body weight over all time points, respectively, in both groups (6, 12 and 24 months). Treatment adherence also did not differ between the groups.Having “skin in the game” by paying for ESG OOP does not correlate with better outcomes or treatment adherence, which further supports broad insurance coverage for this procedure.

Summary Metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS), including Roux‐en‐Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), have proven effective in promoting long‐term diabetes remission among patients with type‐2 diabetes (T2D). In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effectiveness of RYGB and SG in achieving diabetes remission, specifically among patients with T2D and vascular complications, while accounting for similar baseline diabetes severity. Although various scores predict diabetes remission after bariatric surgery, they do not consider diabetes‐related vascular complications, which can influence outcomes even in patients with similar baseline T2D severity. We collected preoperative data on microvascular (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy) and macrovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accidents, peripheral artery disease) to compare the efficacy of RYGB and SG. Among 961 patients analysed, those with vascular complications showed higher remission rates with RYGB (OR: 1.97) compared to SG, despite similar baseline diabetes severity. Notably, RYGB patients with microvascular complications had a significant advantage in achieving T2D remission (OR: 2.95). However, no significant differences in remission were observed in patients with macrovascular complications. These findings suggest that RYGB may be more effective than SG in specific patient populations, particularly those with microvascular complications, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies.

Background Obesity is intricately associated with type-2 diabetes (T2D) and other cardiovascular conditions, increasing morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS) have shown promising results in significant weight loss and T2D remission, but existing predictive scores for post-MBS diabetes remission do not consider insulin dosage, potentially overlooking a critical factor. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with T2D who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The study focused on insulin dosage impact, divided into quartiles, on remission rates post-MBS. The effectiveness of RYGB vs SG was compared within insulin dose quartiles with up to 5 years of follow up. Results A total of 508 patients (64% female, 94.9% White, mean age 53.5 ± 10.5 years, BMI (46.0 ± 8.3 kg/m 2 ) were included in the analysis. This study demonstrates a profound association between insulin dosage quartiles and T2D remission after MBS. Patients with lower insulin requirements showed superior remission rates; those in the lowest quartile had remission rates of 73%, 70%, and 62% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, compared to 34%, 37%, and 36% in the highest quartile ( P < 0.001 across all intervals). RYGB surgery showed a significantly better remission in the second and third insulin quartiles, suggesting its effectiveness over SG for patients with mid-range insulin requirements. Conclusion This study underscores the importance of considering insulin dosage when predicting T2D remission post-MBS. The findings advocate for a more nuanced selection of MBS procedures based on individual insulin profiles, potentially enhancing diabetes remission outcomes.

SummaryMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) is effective in improving metabolic outcomes and reducing weight in patients with obesity and diabetes, with less explored benefits in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of MBS on weight loss and insulin requirements in T1D patients compared to insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients over a 5‐year period. This retrospective analysis included patients who underwent primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with a confirmed preoperative diagnosis of either T1D or insulin‐treated T2D. Primary endpoints focusing on weight loss and secondary outcomes assessing changes in insulin dosage and glycemic control. After 5 years, weight loss was similar across groups, with total weight loss at 14.2% for T1D and 17.6% for insulin‐treated T2D in SG, and 22.6% for T1D vs. 26.8% for insulin‐treated T2D in RYGB. Additionally, there was a significant reduction in median daily insulin doses from 140.5 units at baseline to 77.5 units at 1 year postoperatively, sustained at 90 units at 5 years. The differential impact of MBS procedure was also highlighted, where RYGB patients showed a more pronounced and enduring decrease in insulin requirements compared to SG.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) demonstrates high rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission, a phenomenon hypothesized to be mediated mainly by weight loss. Compared with procedures that do not bypass the proximal small intestines, such as sleeve gastrectomy (SG), RYGB exhibits weight loss–independent intestinal mechanisms conducive to T2DM remission. We investigated continued diabetes remission (CDR) rates despite weight recurrence (WR) after RYGB compared with an SG cohort. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients who underwent successful primary RYGB or SG with a BMI value of 35 kg/m 2 or more and a preoperative diagnosis of T2DM was performed. Patients with less than 5 years of follow-up, absence of WR, or lack of T2DM remission at nadir weight were excluded. After selecting the optimal procedure for glycemic control, rates of CDR were then stratified into WR quartiles and compared. RESULTS: A total of 224 RYGB and 46 SG patients were analyzed. The overall rate of CDR was significantly higher in the RYGB group (75%) compared with the SG group (34.8%; p < 0.001). The odds of T2DM recurrence were 5.5 times higher after SG compared with RYGB. Rates of CDR were stratified into WR quartiles (85.5%, <25%; 81.7%, 25% to 44.9%; 63.2%, 45% to 74.9%; and 60%, >75%). Baseline insulin use, higher preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin, and longer preoperative duration of T2DM were associated with T2DM recurrence, whereas WR was not. CONCLUSIONS: T2DM remission rates after RYGB are maintained despite WR, arguing for a concurrent weight loss–independent metabolic benefit likely facilitated by bypassing the proximal small intestine.

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has demonstrated excellent glycemic control and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission for patients with obesity and T2DM. Duration of T2DM is a consistent negative predictor of remission after RYGB. However, the exact timing to offer surgical intervention during the course of the disease is not well elucidated. Material and methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study between 2008 and 2020 to establish the exact association between duration of T2DM and remission after RYGB. The authors divided our cohort into quartiles of preoperative disease duration to quantify the change in remission rates for each year of delay between T2DM diagnosis and RYGB. The authors also compared the average time to remission and changes in glycemic control parameters. Results: A total of 519 patients (67.2% female; age 53.4±10.7 year; BMI 46.6±8.4 kg/m 2 ) with a follow-up period of 6.6±3.8 years were included. Remission was demonstrated in 51% of patients. Longer duration of T2DM was a significant negative predictor of remission with an estimated decrease in remission rates of 7% for each year of delay [(OR=0.931 (95% CI: 0.892–0.971); P< 0.001)]. Compared to patients with <3 years of T2DM, remission decreased by 37% for patients with 3–6 years, 64% for those with 7–12 years, and 81% for patients with more than 12 years ( P <0.001). Half of the patients reached T2DM remission after 0.5 and 1.1 years, respectively, for the first and second quartiles, while patients in the other quartiles never reached 50% remission. Lastly, The authors noted an overall improvement in all glycemic control parameters for all quartiles at last follow-up. Conclusion: Patients with a recent history of T2DM who undergo early RYGB experience significantly higher and earlier T2DM remission compared to patients with a prolonged history of preoperative T2DM, suggesting potential benefit of early surgical intervention to manage patients with obesity and T2DM.

Background: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is characterized by a constellation of symptoms related to the compression of the celiac artery trunk. Laparoscopic release of the ligament has demonstrated its effectiveness in alleviating these symptoms while showing lower postoperative complication rates, reduced hospital stays, and improved clinical outcomes. This study describes a single institution’s experience with this procedure and reports on the preoperative assessment, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes of patients with MALS. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic MAL release (MALR) at a single high-volume academic institution from June 2021 to July 2023. Patient demographics, preoperative assessment, postoperative complications, and resolution of preoperative symptoms data were collected. Results: A total of 30 patients underwent laparoscopic MALR, with 76.7% being female and a mean age of 33.4±16.3 years. The most common presenting symptom was postprandial epigastric pain (100%), followed by abdominal pain and nausea (83.3%), among others. The preoperative evaluation for all patients included a duplex mesenteric doppler and CT angiogram during inspiration and expiration and 3D reconstruction. Successful laparoscopic decompression of the celiac artery was achieved in 96.6% of cases, with only one conversion to an open procedure. There was only one reported early (<30 d postoperatively) complication with no subsequent late complications or mortality. None of the patients required reintervention or reoperation. Only 1 patient required postoperative celiac plexus/splanchnic block injection to alleviate pain. Conclusions: MALS can be effectively and safely managed using a laparoscopic approach when performed by an experienced minimally invasive surgeon. Further studies with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the long-term effectiveness of this technique.