Luria, David

Background —Previous studies of atrial flutter have found linear block at the crista terminalis; this was thought to predispose the patient to the arrhythmia. More recent observations, however, have demonstrated crista conduction. We sought to characterize the posterior boundary of atrial flutter. Methods and Results —Patients with counterclockwise flutter (n=20), clockwise flutter (n=3), or both (n=5) were studied using two 20-pole catheters. Biplane fluoroscopy determined catheter positions. During counterclockwise flutter, craniocaudal activation occurred along the entire lateral and posterior right atrial walls. Septal activation proceeded caudocranially. In all patients, a line of block was seen in the posteromedial (sinus venosa) right atrium; this was manifested by the presence of double potentials where the upward and downward activations collided. Anatomic location was confirmed by intracardiac echocardiography in 9 patients. In patients with clockwise flutter, the line of block and double potentials were seen in the same location during counterclockwise flutter, but the activation sequence around the line of block was reversed. Pacing near the site of double potentials during sinus rhythm excluded a fixed line of block, and premature atrial complexes demonstrated functional block with manifest double potentials. In 2 patients, posterior ectopy organized to subsequently initiate isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. Conclusions —(1) A functional line of block is seen at the posteromedial (sinus venosa region) right atrium during counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter. (2) All lateral wall right atrial activation can be uniform during flutter, without linear block or double potentials in the region of the crista terminalis. (3) Activation at the site of posteromedial right atrial functional block can organize to subsequently initiate isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

Background—Women with congenital long-QT syndrome experience an increased risk for cardiac events after the onset of adolescence that is more pronounced among carriers of the LQT2 genotype. We hypothesized that the hormonal changes associated with menopause may affect clinical risk in this population.Methods and Results—We used a repeated-events analysis to evaluate the risk for recurrent syncope during the menopause transition and postmenopausal periods (5 years before and after the age at onset of menopause, respectively) among 282 LQT1 (n=151) and LQT2 (n=131) women enrolled in the Long-QT Syndrome Registry. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk for recurrent syncope (n=150) among LQT2 women was significantly increased during both menopause transition (hazard ratio, 3.38;P=0.005) and the postmenopausal period (hazard ratio, 8.10;P<0.001) compared with the reproductive period. The risk increase was evident among women who did or did not receive estrogen therapy. In contrast, among LQT1 women, the onset of menopause was associated with a reduction in the risk for recurrent syncope (hazard ratio, 0.19;P=0.05;P=0.02 for genotype-by-menopause interaction). Only 22 women (8%) experienced aborted cardiac arrest or sudden cardiac death during follow-up. The frequency of aborted cardiac arrest/sudden cardiac death showed a similar genotype-specific association with the onset of menopause.Conclusions—The onset of menopause is associated with a significant increase in the risk of cardiac events (dominated by recurrent episodes of syncope) in LQT2 women, suggesting that careful follow-up and continued long-term therapy are warranted in this population.