Ortega-Aviles, Laura M.

Background Patients with single-ventricle physiology are often palliated with the Fontan operation, which may involve the creation of a fenestration. We aimed to evaluate differences in cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) performance between patients with fenestrated and non-fenestrated Fontan circulation. Methods Patients with a Fontan circulation referred to CPET between 2006 and 2024 were included and were categorised based on their fenestration status at the time of CPET. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of fenestration on peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 ), and Cox proportional hazard to evaluate the impact of fenestration on cardiovascular outcomes (death, heart transplant and Fontan-related hospitalisation). Results Of the 184 patients, 141 were classified as non-fenestrated and 43 as fenestrated. The minute ventilation-carbon dioxide production (V E /VCO 2 slope) was higher in the fenestrated (36.9±7.9) versus (33.2±6.2; p=0.009) in the non-fenestrated group. There was no significant difference in predicted VO 2 between groups (non-fenestrated 51.9%±14.4 vs 51.3%±15.6; p=0.7). Resting oxygen saturation was higher in the non-fenestrated group (93%±4.7 compared with fenestrated group 90.1%±5; p<0.001). Fontan fenestration was not significantly associated with the composite outcome; older patient age at the time of the CPET, cirrhosis and ventricular ejection fraction <40% were significantly associated with higher risk, while higher resting systolic blood pressure, left ventricular morphology and higher predicted peak VO 2 were protective. Conclusions The increased hypoxia and reduced ventilatory efficiency associated with Fontan fenestration offset any potential benefits, resulting in similar exercise performance between the groups. Fontan fenestration was not significantly associated with cardiovascular outcomes.

Abstract Background Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has emerged as an important tool for risk stratification and prognosis assessment in patients with cardiac diseases. The Weber and Ventilatory Functional Classification have been correlated with outcomes in patients with Heart Failure (HF). Weber classification is based on VO2: Weber class A, peak VO2 &gt;20 mL/kg per minute; class B, peak VO2 16–20 mL/kg per minute; class C, peak VO2 10–16 mL/kg per minute; and class D, peak VO2 ≤10 mL/kg per minute and Ventilatory classification on VE/VCO2 slope I-IV (Figure A). Although VO2 and VE/VCO2 variables have found altered in the amyloidosis population, the applicability of this classification in a cohort of amyloidosis patients and its correlation with all-cause mortality have not been explored. Purpose To evaluate if the Weber and Ventilatory Classification of HF predicts mortality amyloidosis patients. Methods 194 with diagnosis of amyloidosis who underwent CPET from February 2010 to February 2024 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients with at least one CPET complete data were included in the analysis. Data on the type of amyloidosis, comorbidities, and echocardiogram were retrieved from medical records. Cohort was divided into two groups according to the Weber Classification: Weber Class A/B and Weber Class C/D. Individuals with CPET studies after heart transplant were excluded from the analysis. Statistical analyses including Fisher’s exact test, chi-square, Tukey-Kramer (TK), Cox regression model analysis, proportional hazards model for time to event, and Kaplan–Meier curves were performed. A p-value &lt;0.05 was considered significant. Results Out of the 194 patients, 94 were classified as Weber A-B and 100 as Weber B-C. The age at stress test was similar between the groups: Weber A/B 62.9 ± 11.7 years and Weber C/D 62.3 ± 10.7 years (p=0.087). Ejection Fraction was similar between groups, 32% and 28.9% in A-B and C-D respectively (p =0.207). Higher levels of NT-proBNP were found in the Weber C/D group. The prevalence of comorbidities was balanced among the groups except chronic kidney disease, which was higher in Weber Class C/D (40%) vs (20.2%) in Weber Class A/B (Table 1). Cox analysis revealed a strong association between higher Weber class and the outcome HR 2.36 (1.18 – 4.71) p=0.014. For Higher Ventilatory Class (Group III-IV) similar results were found HR 2.95 (1.60 – 5.45) p=0.005(Table 2). Mortality was significantly higher during the follow-up in the Weber C/D group (25%) vs (10%) in the Weber A-B group p=0.007(Figure D). Conclusion Weber and ventilatory Classification based on CPET, besides predicting outcomes in patients with cardiac disease, are strong predictors of mortality in patients with amyloidosis. These findings suggest that this patient group benefits from earlier stratification to assess prognosis and the potential requirement for transplant independently from other factors.