Hurtado, M D

Objective: To compare 1-year changes in estimated 10-year and lifetime atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapy among adults with obesity. Summary Background Data: Obesity is a major driver of ASCVD through adverse metabolic and inflammatory pathways. Metabolic and bariatric surgery and GLP-1 receptor agonists represent the most effective contemporary treatments for obesity and are increasingly used to mitigate cardiovascular risk. However, their comparative effects on integrated short-term and lifetime ASCVD risk in real-world clinical practice remain incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²) who underwent MBS or initiated GLP-1RA therapy between 2020 and 2023 within a large tertiary health care system in the United States. Participants were identified from electronic health records and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes were 1-year changes in estimated 10-year and lifetime ASCVD risk. Secondary outcomes included percent total body weight loss, blood pressure, and lipid parameters. Multivariable linear regression models were used to adjust for baseline body mass index and baseline ASCVD risk. Results: The final cohort included 812 patients, of whom 579 underwent MBS and 233 initiated GLP-1RA therapy. At baseline, patients receiving GLP-1RAs were older and had higher estimated ASCVD risk. At 1 year, reductions in 10-year ASCVD risk were similar between groups (−0.8% vs. −1.1%; P =.36). In contrast, lifetime ASCVD risk decreased significantly more following MBS than GLP-1RA therapy (−8.6% vs. −1.7%; P <.001). MBS was associated with greater percent total body weight loss (−27.8% vs. −11.1%; P <.001) and more favorable lipid changes, including larger reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and greater increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. After adjustment, MBS remained independently associated with a greater reduction in lifetime ASCVD risk compared with GLP-1RA therapy (β −6.92; 95% CI −9.22 to −4.62). Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, both MBS and GLP-1RA therapy were associated with improvements in estimated cardiovascular risk, but MBS conferred substantially greater reductions in lifetime ASCVD risk, accompanied by superior weight loss and lipid improvements. These findings highlight the complementary roles of surgical and pharmacologic therapies in obesity management and may inform strategies to optimize long-term cardiovascular risk reduction.

ABSTRACT Objective This study compared the effects of phentermine‐topiramate‐ER (mid‐dose 7.5/46 mg) versus placebo on weight loss and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk outcomes when used as an adjunct to a digitally enhanced lifestyle intervention (DELI). Methods We conducted a 12‐month, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial at a single tertiary academic center in the United States (June 2020–June 2022). Eighty participants with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) were enrolled in the DELI program, consisting of in‐person and telehealth modalities, dietary and physical activity goals, and use of a smartphone application integrated with digital devices (Apple Watch and Bluetooth‐enabled weight scale and blood pressure monitor). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either phentermine‐topiramate‐ER ( n = 42) or placebo ( n = 38) in addition to the DELI. Results At 3 months, the phentermine‐topiramate group lost a mean of 10.82 kg versus 4.04 kg in the placebo group (mean difference −6.78 kg; p = 0.002). At 12 months, weight loss was 15.32 kg versus 5.85 kg, respectively (mean difference −9.48 kg; p < 0.001). Participants receiving phentermine‐topiramate‐ER experienced a 3.35% reduction in the estimated atherosclerotic CVD risk compared to baseline ( p = 0.004). Conclusions Phentermine‐topiramate‐ER, when combined with a DELI, produced significant and sustained weight loss and reduced CVD risk in adults with obesity. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04408586

Abstract Disclosure: N. Safwan: None. E.R. Uddenberg: None. M.D. Hurtado: None. M. Saadedine: None. S.S. Faubion: None. O. Obrutu: None. S.L. Berga: None. M.D. Pisarska: None. C. Bairey Merz: None. C.L. Shufelt: None. Background: Functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA) accounts for 30% of secondary amenorrhea due to suppression of GnRH associated hypercortisolemia resulting in chronic hypoestrogenemia. FHA occurs as a result of varying combinations of psychosocial stress, excessive exercise, and/or disordered eating. FHA is associated with decreased bone mineralization; however, it is unknown how bone health compares to older, menopausal women who also experience bone loss. We compared dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone health parameters among women with FHA, eumenorrheic controls, and recently menopausal women and evaluated if previous oral contraceptive (OC) use among FHA women has an impact on bone mineral density (BMD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 20 women with FHA, 9 eumenorrheic controls, and 12 recently menopausal women who underwent hip and spine DXA. All participants were not on hormone therapy. FHA was defined as amenorrhea &gt;3 consecutive months, estradiol &lt;50 pg/ml, FSH &lt;10 mIU/L, and LH &lt;10 mIU/L, excluding other etiologies including PCOS, prolactinoma, thyroid dysfunction, and pregnancy. Eumenorrheic controls had self-reported monthly menses confirmed with day 22-24 progesterone &gt;3 ng/ml. Recently menopausal women had natural menopause &lt;3 years of final menstrual period, and FSH &gt;30 mIU/L. DXA bone health parameters were measured using Lunar iDXA (GE) including BMD from the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and hip. Statistical analysis included nonparametric testing with pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum and Kruskal Wallis, reported as median [interquartile ranges]. Results: By design, the mean age of FHA was 28 ± 6 yr, 29 ± 3 yr for controls, and 54 ± 2 yr for recently menopausal women (p&lt;0.0001). There were no differences in weight or BMI among the groups (p=0.27, p=0.30, respectively). BMD L1-L4 differed among the three groups with 1.10 g/cm2 [1.00, 1.24] for FHA, 1.18 [1.15, 1.29] for eumenorrheic controls, and 1.02 [0.96, 1.08] for menopausal women (p=0.002). Pairwise analysis revealed a significant difference in BMD L1-L4 between FHA and controls (p=0.04) and menopausal women and controls (p=0.009, age-adjusted). However, there was no difference in BMD L1-L4 between FHA and menopausal women (p=0.08, age-adjusted). In FHA women with previous OC use, BMD L1-L4 was not different from eumenorrheic controls (p=0.20), while BMD L1-L4 differed from that of recently menopausal women (p=0.004). These differences were not observed at the hip. Conclusion: Compared to eumenorrheic controls, lumbar spine BMD in young women with FHA (mean age 28 yr) was similar to recently menopausal women (mean age 54 yr) emphasizing the profound bone impact of FHA. Previous OC use seems to mitigate FHA bone mineralization changes. Future studies should investigate if bone health differs among women with FHA based on underlying cause and if previous OC use plays a role in maintaining bone health. Presentation: 6/3/2024