Simon, Karissa

Abstract Background: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (ICSI) have been shown to be an effective symptomatic non-operative treatment for hip osteoarthritis (OA) and other joint-related pain. There has been recent dispute over the true risk of complications from ICSI specifically when injected into the hip. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head has been reported to occur in up to 30.5% of patients after undergoing hip ICSI, and up to 50.6% of patients experiencing osteoarthritis progression in as little as 3 months following injection. Purpose: To analyze the current protocol of hip ICSIs performed by two fellowship-trained non-operative sports medicine physicians and assess the rate of femoral head avascular necrosis. We hypothesized that the rate of AVN will be less than what has been recently reported in the literature. Study Design: Retrospective chart review Methods: Patients that underwent at least one intra-articular corticosteroid hip injection by two fellowship trained non-operative sports medicine physicians at this institution were identified using an institutional database. Exclusion criteria included injections with contrast dye used for imaging, injections that administered orthobiologics to the intra-articular, and non-intra-articular injections. Procedure notes were reviewed for anesthetic and steroid type, dosage, and needle size. Each chart was screened for demographic information, post-injection infections, AVN diagnosis, and subsequent hip replacement. 10 patients were identified with an AVN diagnosis. Their MRNs were sent to a board-certified radiologist at the same medical institution. The radiologist was blinded to the patient’s chart and instructed to identify the first radiograph with evidence of AVN. Patients were excluded if the reviewer did not agree with the diagnosis as it appeared in the medical chart or the AVN developed post-traumatically. Results: 449 patients, 530 hips, underwent 1.8 ± 1.4 ICSIs and 16.3% underwent THA at an average of 2.2 ± 2.3 years following their first injection. Of the 530 hips that underwent ICSI, only 1 hip demonstrated findings of AVN on radiographs following the first injection, and this patient had been taking oral prednisone for over 20 years. Conclusions: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are a relatively safe symptomatic treatment option for hip pain secondary to both OA and non-OA pathology to be considered when other non-operative treatment options have failed. While the use of steroids comes with an inherent risk of osteonecrosis and cartilage damage, these results demonstrate that, when performed properly with ultrasound guidance and sterile technique, the risk of femoral head avascular necrosis is minimal.

Abstract Background: Iliopsoas (IP) tendinitis is a recognized complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and isolated iliopsoas fractional lengthening (IPFL) has been able to provide symptom relief. IPFL has traditionally been done openly; however, the arthroscopic IPFL has recently been described as an alternative, offering the potential for lower surgical site morbidity and a more favorable post-operative recovery. Purpose: To compare clinical and patient reported outcomes following open and arthroscopic IPFL. We hypothesize that patients undergoing arthroscopic IPFL will have improved pain, function, and satisfaction with lower post-operative complication rates when compared to patients undergoing open IPFL. Methods: Patients with symptomatic IP tendinitis following THA who underwent IPFL from 1988-2023 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included 2 years follow-up and no concomitant procedures. Patient records were evaluated for surgery type, radiographic anterior acetabular component overhang, reoperations, and need for revision THA. Surveys were used to report overall surgery satisfaction, postoperative subjective hip flexion strength and anterior groin pain improvement, mHHS, SANE score, Tegner activity scale, and VAS for pain. Results: Fifty-two patients (16 males and 36 females, age: 63.9 ± 11.7 years, BMI: 28.8 ± 5.4 kg/m2) were followed for a mean of 68.7 (24.0 – 203.7) months postoperatively. Overall surgery satisfaction was 7.9 (arthroscopic) and 6.0 (open) (p = 0.178). 86% of patients treated arthroscopically reported feeling “slightly” or “much better” and 86% also reported improvement in their anterior groin pain, compared to 55% and 45% respectively treated openly. In the arthroscopic cohort, 64% reported that their hip flexion strength was “slightly ” or “much better”, compared to 36% treated openly. Average VAS pain score was 1.7 ± 2.7 at rest (arthroscopic: 1.1 ± 2.2, open: 3.3 ± 3.2, p = 0.0092) and 3.0 ± 1.3 (arthroscopic: 3.1 ± 1.3, open: 2.6 ± 1.1) with use. Mean postoperative Tegner score was 3.0 ± 1.3 (arthroscopic: 3.1 ± 1.3, open: 2.6 ± 1.1) compared to 2.3 ± 1.2 preoperatively (arthroscopic: 2.3 ± 1.3, open: 2.1 ± 1.1) (p = 0.0018). Mean post-operative mHHS and SANE score was 74.9 ± 21.6 (arthroscopic: 77.0 ± 19.0, open: 69.2 ± 26.9) and 69.7± 29.7 (arthroscopic: 70.9 ± 28.7, open: 66.7 ± 31.8) respectively. Conclusion: The results indicate that arthroscopic IPFL trends towards significantly improved pain, function, and satisfaction scores when compared to patients undergoing open IPFL, and should be considered when appropriate over an open IPFL given the less invasive nature of an arthroscopic procedure.

Abstract Purpose: 1) To report the clinical outcomes and reoperation rates of arthro- and endo-scopic iliopsoas release at short-term follow-up following ipsilateral total hip arthroplasty from two separate medical institutions, and 2) to evaluate whether demographic and radiographic parameters are associated with postoperative patient reported outcomes. Methods: Patients with iliopsoas tendinitis in the setting of prior THA that underwent arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening from 1988 – 2023 were reviewed at two academic institutions. Patients were included if they had minimum 12-month follow-up and were evaluated for preoperative anterior acetabular component overhang, surgery satisfaction, postoperative subjective hip flexion strength and anterior groin pain improvement, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Tegner activity scale, visual analog scale (VAS), and revision hip arthroplasty. Results: Sixty hips in 58 patients (19 males, 39 females) were followed for a mean of 39.3 (12.0-105.9) months postoperatively. 77% of patients reported feeling “much” or “slightly better”, 75% reported improved anterior groin pain, and 60% reported improved subjective hip flexion strength. Surgery satisfaction was 7.2 ± 3.3 (scale of 0 to 10). Mean postoperative mHHS, VAS pain at rest, VAS pain with use, and SANE scores were 73.9 ± 19.4, 1.3 ± 2.4, 3.8 ± 2.9, and 71.9 ± 21.9 respectively. Preoperative anterior acetabular component overhang was 3.3 ± 6.5 mm and didn’t significantly correlate with postoperative PROs (p ≥ 0.45). Tegner score improved to 2.9 ± 1.4 from 2.5 ± 1.7 preoperatively (p = 0.0253). Three patients underwent revision arthroplasty at a mean of 25.3 (11.6 – 40.4) months postoperatively, with an acetabular component revision rate of 3.3%. Conclusions: Satisfactory outcomes and low revision arthroplasty rates were observed in patients undergoing arthroscopic iliopsoas lengthening following THA. There was no statistically significant relationship between anterior acetabular component overhang and final PROs. Level of Evidence: IV; Retrospective Case Series

Objectives: Radial tears of the meniscus are increasingly treated with repair instead of partial meniscectomy, with satisfactory short-term clinical outcomes. There remains a paucity of mid- and long-term outcomes data for this preservation technique. The purpose of this study was to 1) evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes and reoperation rate of radial meniscal repair versus bucket-handle meniscal repair and 2) evaluate the outcomes of both surgeries overtime. We hypothesized that radial repair would provide similar outcomes and reoperation rates to that of bucket-handle meniscal repair in this propensity-matched cohort. Methods: A previously identified cohort of radial meniscal tears without concurrent root injuries undergoing surgical repair at a single institution between 2011 and 2015 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria was patients undergoing repair of full-thickness radial tears. Exclusion criteria were patients who had 1) not consented for research follow-up, 2) <2 year of follow-up, 3) high-grade (Outerbridge grade 3 or 4) chondromalacia, 4) knee dislocations or combined anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament injuries, 5) repair of posterior meniscal root tears, and 6) repair of partial radial tears. Propensity matching was performed based on age at surgery, sex, laterality, body mass index (BMI), and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a comparison pool of 70 bucket-handle meniscal repairs (BHMR). Reoperation-free survival rates, Tegner Activity Score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were analyzed. Results: Twenty-four patients (18 males, 6 females, age 22.8 ± 11.9 years, BMI 26.5 ± 5.8) with radial meniscal repair were included in this study. Eighteen of these patients were successfully propensity matched to 18 bucket-handle meniscal tears for an overall mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 1.7 years (range, 7.3-13.5) (Table 1). The 24 radial tear repairs demonstrated significant and durable postoperative improvements at mean 10.2 years across VAS at rest (3.0 ± 2.5 vs 0.5 ± 1.0, p < 0.001), VAS for pain at use (5.8 ± 2.9 vs 1.4 ± 1.9, p < 0.001) Tegner (2.6 ± 1.4 vs 6.8 ± 2.0, p < 0.001) and IKDC (39.8 ± 12.3 vs 84.1 ± 16.5, p < 0.001) (Table 1). Of patients not undergoing reoperation (19), 100% reported being “Satisfied” 4/19 (21%) or “Very Satisfied” 15/19 (79%). When the 18 radial tear repairs were compared to the 18 BHMT repairs, there was no significant difference across VAS for pain at rest (0.6 ± 1.2 vs 0.3 ± 0.7, p = 0.48), VAS for pain at use (1.6 ± 2.1 vs 1.1 ± 1.3, p = 0.48) Tegner (6.9 ± 2.2 vs 6.4 ± 2.1, p = 0.51) and IKDC (83.4 ± 17.4 vs 82.1 ± 14.1, p = 0.83) (Table 2). Importantly, survival without reoperation rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups at 10-year follow-up (14/18 (78%) vs 16/18 (89%), p = 0.37) (Figure 1). There was no significant difference between clinical outcomes (Tegner and IKDC) at final follow-up in the radial repair group as compared to the 4-year mid-term outcomes (p = 0.58 and 0.19 respectively). For the BHMR group, Tegner scores were not significantly different (p = 0.60) compared with their 4-year timepoint; however, IKDC scores at the final timepoint were significantly lower 93.4 ± 3.4 vs 82.1 ± 14.1 (p = 0.01). Notably, both the radial repair and bucket-handle repairs groups reported final follow-up Tegner scores that were not significantly different from their preinjury Tegner scores (p = 0.70 for the radial group and p = 0.62 for the bucket-handle group). Conclusions: At mean 10-year follow-up, significant clinical improvements and high rates of satisfaction were observed for radial meniscal tear repair. When propensity matched, radial and BHMR demonstrated durable improvements in postoperative VAS for pain, IKDC, and Tegner scores, as well as similar, acceptable reoperation rates. [Figure: see text]