Grewal, Harneet

Abstract Introduction Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is often encountered among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) due to the use of anticoagulation. This study assesses disparities in GIB‐related mortality among decedents with AF in the United States. Methods GIB mortality data in patients with AF from 1999 to 2020 was queried from the CDC database. Decedent demographic information (age, sex, race and ethnicity, and geographic residence) was obtained from death certificates. We calculated age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) through the direct method and estimated the annual percentage change (APC) in mortality using log‐linear regression models. Results From 11,209 GIB‐related deaths among AF decedents, we observed an increase in AAMR from 0.12 in 1999 to 0.21 in 2020, particularly during the 2009 to 2020 period (APC +4.8, p < .001). Disproportionate mortality rates were noted in males (AAMR 0.18) and White populations (AAMR 0.15) as compared to females (AAMR 0.13) and Black populations (AAMR 0.10), respectively. Rural regions also reported higher mortality (AAMR 0.18) than urban areas (AAMR 0.14). Mortality shifts in urban regions remained stagnant from 1999 to 2009 (APC –0.15, p = .806) followed by an increase from 2009 to 2020 (APC +4.83, p < .001). However, mortality increased consistently from 1999 to 2020 in rural regions (APC +4.08, p < .001). The Northeast US exhibited the highest mortality rate (AAMR 0.18), followed by the Midwest (AAMR 0.16), West (AAMR 0.14), and South (AAMR 0.13). Conclusions Disparities in GIB mortality among AF decedents were identified. These findings accentuate the need for targeted interventions to mitigate GIB risks in vulnerable subgroups.

Antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) poses a dilemma. We compared outcomes of dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) (direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)/warfarin + antiplatelets) vs triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) (DOACs/warfarin, aspirin, and P2Y12 inhibitor) in this population. Multiple databases were searched from inception to December 17, 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DAT vs TAT in patients with AF and ACS. Outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), bleeding events, stroke, stent thrombosis, and myocardial infarction (MI). Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with a random-effects model using the inverse-variance technique. We assigned I 2 > 50% as an indicator of statistical heterogeneity. p -Value <0.05 was considered significant. Ten RCTs comprising 6186 patients on TAT (female 26%, mean age 71 ± 9 years) and 6800 patients on DAT (female 27%, mean age 71 ± 9 years) were included. Patients receiving DAT experienced lower rates of bleeding events compared to those receiving TAT, with relative risks of 0.69 [0.55–0.87] ( p < 0.001), 0.65 [0.40–1.06] ( p = 0.09), and 0.62 [0.46–0.84] ( p < 0.001) for TAT durations of 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. No difference was seen in the occurrence of MACE, MI, stroke, or stent thrombosis between DAT and TAT across all three durations of TAT. This is the largest pooled analysis comparing TAT to DAT stratified by the duration of antithrombotic therapy. Our results revealed that DAT was associated with reduced bleeding risk despite no difference in other outcomes.