Jiezhen, Tracy Loh

AimsThere is a lack of published literature on the diagnostic reproducibility of oesophageal squamous dysplasia using a two‐tiered grading system.Methods and resultsWe identified 75 oesophageal biopsies, which were reviewed by 10 international pathologists twice (1500 total observations) with a > 4‐week washout period. Between rounds, a consensus meeting refining diagnostic criteria was held and an atlas was created to provide illustrations. Overall agreement was fair with kappa of 0.35 and 0.32 in round 1 and 2, respectively. Agreement was moderate to fair for negative for dysplasia (ND) (round 1 = 0.41 and round 2 = 0.34) and poor for indefinite for dysplasia (IND) and low‐grade dysplasia (LGD) (kappa <0.2). Agreement for high‐grade dysplasia (HGD) was good in both rounds (round 1 = 0.64; round 2 = 0.61). In round 1, majority diagnosis (MDx, ≥6 of 10 raters agreeing) was seen in 51 (68%) cases with the majority classified as ND (N = 27) or HGD (N = 18). MDx was rarely achieved for LGD (N = 6). In round 2, MDx was seen in 49 (65%) cases (20 ND, 1 IND, 11 LGD and 17 HGD). Of the 40 cases with MDx for both rounds, 39 were concordant (15 HGD, 6 LGD and 18 ND).ConclusionsOverall agreement among pathologists in diagnosing squamous lesions is fair; however, HGD had good agreement. This study fills an important gap in our knowledge of the inter‐rater variability in the diagnosis of oesophageal squamous dysplasia.

The nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network (NASH-CRN) system is commonly used for histologic assessment of disease activity and fibrosis in NASH. Despite this, the system does not fully capture the range of disease activity and fibrosis. As such, an expanded NAS (E-NAS) grading and staging system with a calculated E-NAS index was developed by our group. In this follow up study, we aim to revalidate the E-NAS system and compare its reliability to existing systems. Hematoxylin and eosin and trichrome stained sections from 40 liver biopsies were reviewed digitally by four hepatopathologists and assessed using the NASH-CRN and E-NAS systems as well as a modified Ishak fibrosis stage. The pathologist's gestalt impression of disease activity and fibrosis was scored on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which ranged from 0 (no activity/fibrosis) to 100 (the worst activity/fibrosis ever seen). Inter-rater reliability was assessed, and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated. The E-NAS index had higher inter-rater agreement versus the NAS score (ICC 0.70 vs 0.61). The inter-rater agreement for ballooning in the E-NAS system was also higher at 0.67 compared to the NAS (ICC 0.60). ICCs for fibrosis were comparable between all the systems assessed (0.78 to 0.88). Finally, the calculated E-NAS index was higher with increasing stage of fibrosis compared to the NAS suggesting that it associates better with fibrosis. In summary, the E-NAS system demonstrates substantial inter-rater reliability as well as improved correlation with disease activity VAS and fibrosis compared to the NAS score.