Kushima, Ryoji

AimsThere is a lack of published literature on the diagnostic reproducibility of oesophageal squamous dysplasia using a two‐tiered grading system.Methods and resultsWe identified 75 oesophageal biopsies, which were reviewed by 10 international pathologists twice (1500 total observations) with a > 4‐week washout period. Between rounds, a consensus meeting refining diagnostic criteria was held and an atlas was created to provide illustrations. Overall agreement was fair with kappa of 0.35 and 0.32 in round 1 and 2, respectively. Agreement was moderate to fair for negative for dysplasia (ND) (round 1 = 0.41 and round 2 = 0.34) and poor for indefinite for dysplasia (IND) and low‐grade dysplasia (LGD) (kappa <0.2). Agreement for high‐grade dysplasia (HGD) was good in both rounds (round 1 = 0.64; round 2 = 0.61). In round 1, majority diagnosis (MDx, ≥6 of 10 raters agreeing) was seen in 51 (68%) cases with the majority classified as ND (N = 27) or HGD (N = 18). MDx was rarely achieved for LGD (N = 6). In round 2, MDx was seen in 49 (65%) cases (20 ND, 1 IND, 11 LGD and 17 HGD). Of the 40 cases with MDx for both rounds, 39 were concordant (15 HGD, 6 LGD and 18 ND).ConclusionsOverall agreement among pathologists in diagnosing squamous lesions is fair; however, HGD had good agreement. This study fills an important gap in our knowledge of the inter‐rater variability in the diagnosis of oesophageal squamous dysplasia.

The increasing use of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures has led to the recognition by histopathologists of non‐conventional (or special‐type) dysplasias of the gastrointestinal tract. These lesions can be recognised in association with prevalent underlying gastrointestinal conditions, such as Barrett oesophagus, chronic atrophic gastritis, and inflammatory bowel disease. The diagnosis of these special types can be challenging, and their biological behaviours are not fully characterised. The aim of this review is to provide a global view of non‐conventional dysplastic lesions observed in the various segments of the tubular gastrointestinal tract and describe their salient features. Furthermore, as the clinical implications of these various subtypes have not been broadly tested in practice and are not represented in most management guidelines, we offer guidance on the best management practices for these lesions.