Asgharpour, Amon

Goals: Our aim was to perform a national survey of provider attitudes, practices, and knowledge regarding weight loss and MASLD medications in patients with MASLD. Background: While weight loss is a cornerstone in the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), FDA-approved medications for weight loss remain underutilized. Results: We conducted a survey before resmetirom approval of hepatology and gastroenterology providers practicing in 44 states. Surveys were sent to 747 providers with 304 complete responses (41%), of whom 260 (86%) work at a liver transplant center. While nearly all respondents (96%) believed that weight loss medications could benefit patients with MASLD, 77% have never/rarely prescribed them due to low comfort (81%). Among weight loss medication prescribers, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists were preferred (66%). In contrast, 63% had prescribed off-label medications for MASLD in the past 12 months, most commonly vitamin E (30%) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (25%). The top reported barriers to prescribing weight loss medications were lack of training/unfamiliarity, cost/insurance coverage, and side-effects, which may be explained by low formal obesity education and lack of knowledge (only 33% of FDA-approved medications for weight loss were correctly identified by >50% of providers). Overall, there was reasonable provider-reported adherence to the 2023 AASLD practice guidance for MASLD. Conclusions: This nationwide survey of hepatology and gastroenterology providers before resmetirom demonstrates that while off-label prescribing for MASLD was common, weight loss medication prescription rates remain very low due to low comfort possibly from insufficient education despite strong beliefs that they can benefit patients with MASLD.

Background and Aims: In a recent trial, patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis treated with anakinra plus zinc (A+Z) had lower survival and higher acute kidney injury (AKI) rates versus prednisone (PRED). We characterize the clinical factors and potential mechanisms associated with AKI development in that trial. Approach and Results: Data from 147 participants in a multicenter randomized clinical trial (74 A+Z, 73 PRED) were analyzed. AKI, AKI phenotypes, and kidney injury biomarkers were compared between participants who did/did not develop AKI in the 2 treatment arms. Multivariable competing risk analyses were performed to identify baseline risk factors for incident AKI, with death treated as a competing event. Risk factors considered were age, sex, mean arterial pressure, white blood cell count, albumin, MELD, ascites, HE, and treatment arm. At baseline, no participants had AKI; 33% (n=49) developed AKI during follow-up. AKI incidence was higher in A+Z than in PRED (45% [n=33] versus 22% [n=16], p=0.001). AKI phenotypes were similar between the 2 treatment arms (p=0.361), but peak AKI severity was greater in A+Z than PRED (stage 3 n=21 [63.6%] vs. n=8 [50.0%], p=0.035). At baseline, urine-neutrophil-gelatinase–associated lipocalin levels were similar between participants who developed AKI in both treatment arms (p=0.319). However, day 7 and 14 urine-neutrophil-gelatinase–associated lipocalin levels were significantly elevated in participants treated with A+Z who developed AKI versus participants treated with PRED who developed AKI (p=0.002 and 0.032, respectively). On multivariable competing risk analysis, only A+Z was independently associated with incident AKI (subdistribution hazard ratio 2.35, p=0.005). Conclusions: AKI occurred more frequently and was more severe in participants treated with A+Z. A+Z–treated participants with AKI had higher urine-neutrophil-gelatinase–associated lipocalin, suggesting that A+Z maybe nephrotoxic in patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis.