Langstraat, Carrie

PURPOSEThe purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer during secondary cytoreductive surgery.MATERIALS AND METHODSPatients were intraoperatively randomly assigned to carboplatin HIPEC (800 mg/m2for 90 minutes) or no HIPEC, followed by five or six cycles of postoperative IV carboplatin-based chemotherapy, respectively. Based on a binomial single-stage pick-the-winner design, an arm was considered winner if ≥ 17 of 49 patients were without disease progression at 24 months post-surgery. Secondary objectives included postoperative toxicity and HIPEC pharmacokinetics.RESULTSOf 98 patients, 49 (50%) received HIPEC. Complete gross resection was achieved in 82% of the HIPEC patients and 94% of the standard-arm patients. Bowel resection was performed in 37% of patients in the HIPEC arm compared with 65% in the standard ( P = .008). There was no perioperative mortality and no difference in use of ostomies, length of stay, or postoperative toxicity. At 24 months, eight patients (16.3%; 1-sided 90% CI, 9.7 to 100) were without progression or death in the HIPEC arm and 12 (24.5%; 1-sided 90% CI, 16.5 to 100) in the standard arm. With a medium follow-up of 39.5 months, 82 patients progressed and 37 died. The median progression-free survival in the HIPEC and standard arms were 12.3 and 15.7 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1 to 2.37; P = .05). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (52.5 v 59.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.73 to 2.67; P = .31). These analyses were exploratory.CONCLUSIONHIPEC with carboplatin was well tolerated but did not result in superior clinical outcomes. This study does not support the use of HIPEC with carboplatin during secondary cytoreductive surgery for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

e18097 Background: AB160 is a 160 nm nano-immunoconjugate consisting of nab-paclitaxel (NP) nanoparticles non-covalently coated with bevacizumab (BEV) for targeted delivery into tissues expressing high levels of vascular-endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Both taxanes (GOG-0129C, GOG-0126R, GOG-0127V) and BEV (GOG-0229E, AURELIA, GOG-0227C) have demonstrated clinical activity in previously treated metastatic endometrial cancer (EC), ovarian cancer (OC), and cervical cancer (CC), respectively. Methods: A 3+3 phase I trial was conducted in patients with EC, platinum-resistant OC and CC who had prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AB160 administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The starting dose level (DL1) was NP at 125 mg/m2 with BEV at 50 mg/m2. There were 2 higher dose levels: DL2 (NP at 150 mg/m2 with BEV at 60 mg/m2) and DL3 (NP at 175 mg/m2 with BEV at 70 mg/m2). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) included grade (G) 4 neutropenia or anemia, PLT < 25,000, serum creatinine ≥2 times baseline, G2-4 neurologic toxicity or G3-4 non-hematologic toxicities. Disease evaluations were conducted after every 2 treatment cycles using RECIST criteria. Patients were treated until disease progression or intolerability. Samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Results: Nine women 41 – 74 years of age (median 57) have enrolled (5 with EC and 4 with OC); data are available for the first 8. No DLTs have been observed among the 3 women enrolled on DL1, 3 women on DL2, and 2 women on DL3. All 3 patients on DL3 continue on treatment. The other 6 patients have discontinued due to adverse reactions (3), progression (2), and patient choice (1). The median number of cycles administered is 6 (4-14). The most common severe (G3/4) toxicities include neutropenia (37.5%) and leukopenia (25%). There have been 5 partial responses (62.5%): 1 on DL1 and 2 each on DL2 and DL3. PK evaluation is pending. Conclusions: AB160 therapy is safe and demonstrates promising clinical activity in patients with previously treated metastatic gynecologic malignancies. Further clinical testing is being pursued in this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT02020707.

6016 Background: The role of HIPEC for recurrent EOC is not well defined. The aim of this phase II study was to determine the proportion of pts without evidence of disease progression at 24 months post SCS +/- intraoperative carboplatin HIPEC. Methods: After SCS to ≤ 0.5 cm residual visible disease pts were intraoperatively randomized to carboplatin HIPEC (800mg/m2 for 90 minutes) or no HIPEC. The HIPEC arm received 5 additional and the standard arm received 6 postoperative cycles of IV platinum-based chemotherapy without maintenance treatment. Based on an exact binomial single stage “pick the winner” design, each arm is considered “winner” if ≥ 17/49 pts are without evidence of disease progression at 24 months post SCS. Secondary objectives include postoperative grade ≥ 3 toxicity and complications within 4 weeks post SCS, and pharmacokinetics of carboplatin HIPEC. Results: Of 98 pts, 49 (50%) were randomized to the HIPEC arm. The arms were well balanced for age, stage, histology, BRCA mutation status, prior chemotherapy, and disease-free interval. Complete gross SCS was achieved in 94% of the standard and 82% of the HIPEC arm (p = 0.12). Bowel resection was performed more frequently in the standard (65%) compared to the HIPEC arm (37%; p = 0.008). Median operative time was shorter in the standard (296 minutes) compared to the HIPEC arm (475 minutes; p < 0.001). There was no perioperative mortality and no difference in use of ostomies, length of stay or postoperative toxicity. At a median follow-up of 27.7 months (range: 8.8-81.8 months) 70 of 98 pts progressed and 26 died with a median progression free survival (PFS) of 14.3 months (12.1-16 months) and a median overall survival (OS) of 55.2 months (47.7-not reached). At 24 months post SCS 32 pts progressed within 24 months in the standard versus 35 in the HIPEC arm. There was no statistically significant difference in median PFS (15.4 vs 12.3 months, p = 0.173) or median OS (69.2 vs 53.1 months, p = 0.317) between arms. These are preliminary efficacy estimates as 83/98 pts have a minimum of 24 months follow-up. Conclusions: The HIPEC arm did not reach the predefined “winner” endpoint; the standard arm is still undetermined as 6 pts did not reach 24 months follow-up. No perioperative mortality, and no increased perioperative morbidity or toxicity was seen with HIPEC. SCS with carboplatin HIPEC followed by 5 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy was not superior to SCS without HIPEC followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01767675.

5510 Background: Single agent aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy is associated with limited clinical activity in ovarian cancer (OC) and endometrial cancers (EC). AI therapy was associated with a progression free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks of only 20% in relapsed OC (Bowman et al, 2002) and a median PFS of 1 month in relapsed EC (Rose et al, 2000). In Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive metastatic breast cancer, clinical studies had shown a significant prolongation of PFS with the addition of the cyclin kinase 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib to AI (Hortobagyi et al, 2016). Here, we report the results of a phase 2 clinical trial of the combination of ribociclib and letrozole in patients with relapsed ER positive OC or EC. Objectives: Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with relapsed ER positive OC or EC alive and progression-free after 12 weeks of therapy (PFS12) with the combination of ribociclib given at a dose of 400 mg orally daily and letrozole 2.5 mg orally daily. A PFS of 45% was considered a favorable result based on the data referenced above from Bowman et al. Methods: Eligibility criteria included patients with relapsed ER positive OC or EC, with measurable disease, not previously treated with ribociclib or AIs. Xenografts were created from CT guided tumor biopsies at baseline to assess feasibility. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled (20 with OC and 20 with EC) ) with a median age of 61 years (range: 30-82) and 64.5 (range: 52-75) in the OC and EC groups respectively. Among the OC patients, 17 had high grade serous carcinomas and 3 had low grade serous carcinomas. 11 EC patients had endometrioid cancers (3 with grade 1 tumors) and 9 had high grade serous tumors. Ten out of 20 OC patients and 11/20 EC patients were alive and progression-free at 12 weeks (PFS12 of 50 and 55%, respectively). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (occurring in at least 5 pts) were leukopenia (18%), lymphopenia (18%), neutropenia (13%), and fatigue (13%). 34 tumor biopsies were suitable for injection into mice and 44% engrafted. ER expression persisted through multiple passages in mice. Two of three EC PDX models exhibited improved PFS with letrozole/ribociclib compared to letrozole alone. Conclusions: The combination of ribociclib and letrozole is associated with a promising 50% and 55% PFS12 in patients with ER positive relapsed OC or EC respectively. Creation of xenograft tumor models from CT guided biopsies of OC and EC tumors was feasible. Clinical trial information: NCT02657928.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is associated with endometrial cancer (EC); however, most patients are unaware of this association and the long-term consequences of their elevated body mass index (BMI). Our objectives were to increase both patient awareness of this association and referral rates to our weight loss clinic using quality improvement (QI) methodology. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team used QI methods to create a multi-pronged toolkit to improve obesity education in patients < 80 years old with a BMI ≥30 mg/kg2 and diagnosis of grade 1-2, stage I EC. Gynecologic oncology and bariatric surgery providers, endocrinologists, nutritionists, and psychologists collaboratively implemented the toolkit comprised of provider communication workshops, patient education resources, and dictation templates. A historic cohort from (July through December 2015) was compared to a post-intervention cohort (July through December 2017). Clinical characteristics, documented conversations, and referrals to the weight loss clinic were abstracted. Data for the two cohorts were compared using Chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, and Student t-test. RESULTS: The historic cohort had 54 patients and the post-intervention cohort had 53 patients. Clinical characteristics were balanced between groups. Conversations about obesity increased from 11.1% (6/54) to 79.2% (42/53) after toolkit implementation (P<.001). Referral rates to the weight loss clinic also increased from 3.7% (2/54) to 25.9% (14/53) (P<.005). No clinical characteristics, including age, BMI, or pre-operative diagnosis, were associated with documented conversations or referrals (P=1.0). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary quality improvement project can be used to increase discussion about obesity and referral to a weight loss clinic in patients with low-risk EC.

INTRODUCTION: To compare two published risk stratification criteria (Milwaukee Model vs. Mayo Criteria) to predict lymphatic dissemination (LD) in endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for EC between 1/1/2004-9/30/2013 and had endometrioid histology without stage IV disease were included and classified as either low-risk or at-risk for LD using two independent risk stratification systems. LD was defined as positive nodes at time of surgery or lymph node recurrence within 2 years of surgery after negative lymph node assessment (LNA) or when LNA was not performed. False positive (FP) and false negative (FN) rates for each risk model were calculated. RESULTS: Among 1103 patients, 81 (7.3%) had LD (72 positive LN and 9 LN recurrences). Most patients (90.2%) had stage I disease. Integration of the Milwaukee Model was associated with a low at-risk rate for LD (38.1%) but a relatively high FN rate (13.6%, 95% CI 7.0-23.0). Conversely, the traditional Mayo Criteria using a tumor diameter (TD) cutoff of ≤2 cm (vs >2 cm) had a higher at-risk rate for LD (69.5%) but a FN rate of 0.0% (95% CI, 0-4.5). Modifying Mayo Criteria using a TD cutoff of ≤3 cm (vs >3 cm) identified fewer women at-risk than using ≤2 cm cutoff (56.8% vs. 69.5%), but had a higher FN rate of 3.7% (95% CI, 0.8-10.4). CONCLUSIONS: The Milwaukee Model had the lowest at-risk rate of LD but an unacceptable FN rate. Modifying the Mayo Criteria by increasing the TD cutoff from the traditional ≤2 cm to ≤3 cm would spare an estimated 12.7% of patients LNA, but the accompanying FN rate is unacceptably high. The traditional Mayo Criteria for low-risk EC remains the most accurate in determining which patients LNA can be omitted.