Israilevich, Rachel

Purpose: The study compares refractive outcomes of secondary intraocular lens (SIOL) surgery performed by vitreoretinal, anterior segment, and both surgeons. Methods: Eyes included in this study underwent SIOL surgery from 2012 to 2024 and had a final postoperative visual acuity of 20/50 or better. Regression analysis compared refractive outcomes, and chi-squared analysis compared complications between subspecialty of SIOL surgeons. Results: A total of 94, 104, and 80 eyes were included in the retina surgeon, anterior segment surgeon, and combo surgeon cohorts, respectively. There was no significant difference in error between target and final postoperative spherical equivalence between retina and combo ( P = 0.079), retina and anterior segment ( P = 0.135), or anterior segment and combo cohorts ( P = 0.567). There was no significant difference in number of eyes with final spherical equivalence within 1 diopter of target spherical equivalence between retina and combo ( P = 0.136), retina and anterior segment ( P = 0.061), or anterior segment and combo cohorts ( P = 0.783). The retina cohort had higher postoperative corneal edema than the combo ( P = 0.017) and the anterior segment cohorts ( P = 0.035). The combo cohort had more postoperative retinal detachment than the anterior segment cohort ( P = 0.046). Conclusion: In eyes with good final vision, retina and anterior segment surgeons have similar refractive outcomes after SIOL surgery.

Purpose: To present a case of a dislocated posterior lamellar graft into the vitreous cavity in an eye that was post pars plana vitrectomy. Methods: Retrospective case report Results: A middle-aged man underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), pars plana lensectomy (PPL), and SSIOL fixation following a traumatic eye injury. The patient required subsequent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal edema, and the posterior lamellar graft was lost intraoperatively into the posterior segment. The graft was surgically retrieved one week later, followed by a successful placement of a new posterior lamellar graft. Histopathological examination of the retrieved graft after one week in the vitreous cavity revealed viable endothelial cells, a novel finding in a posteriorly dislocated DSAEK graft. The newly placed graft remained attached and healed well, with the patient achieving a visual acuity (VA) of 20/80 at three months post-operatively. Discussion: Posteriorly dislocated grafts may be suitable for transplantation to the corneal stroma following prompt retrieval from the vitreous cavity. Prompt retrieval and appropriate surgical techniques are critical for optimizing outcomes in such clinical scenarios.

Purpose: To report the anatomic and visual outcomes of eyes developing delayed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) after macular surgery. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicentric study including eyes undergoing RRD repair at least 3 months after macular surgery for either full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) or epiretinal membrane (ERM). Anatomic and functional assessment, i.e., pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indications and details of macular and RRD surgery, time interval from macular surgery to RRD, intraocular tamponade, location, extent of RRD, and nature of retinal break, was performed. Results: Sixteen out of 2,906 eyes (0.55%) undergoing macular surgery developed RRD after 8.4 ± 5.8 months (mean ± SD). Intraoperative peripheral retina evaluation showed missed/de novo break (11 eyes; 68.75%), no identifiable break i.e., probable microbreak (two eyes; 12.5%), giant retinal tear (two eyes; 12.5%), and retinoschisis related break (one eye; 6.25%). Anatomical success, i.e., attached retina after one surgery, was seen in 14 eyes (87.5%). BCVA worsened from 0.6 ± 0.3 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/80) at baseline to 0.9 ± 0.8 logMAR (20/160) through the last visit (P < 0.001). Conclusion: RRD after macular surgery occurs predominantly via missed/de novo retinal breaks. A significant percentage (50%) of eyes showed worse visual acuity compared with baseline despite successful retinal reattachment.

Goals: We aimed to evaluate whether direct access colonoscopy (DAC) is noninferior to office-scheduled colonoscopy (OSC) for achieving successful colonoscopy. Background: DAC may improve access to colonoscopy. We developed an algorithm assessing eligibility, risk for inadequate preparation, and need for nursing/navigator assistance. Study: This was a retrospective, single-center study of DAC and OSC patients from June 5, 2018, to July 31, 2019. Patients were 45 to 75 years old with an indication of screening or surveillance. A successful colonoscopy met 3 criteria: complete colonoscopy (cecum, anastomosis, or ileum), adequate preparation (Boston Score ≥2/segment), and performed <90 days from initial patient contact. Unsuccessful colonoscopy did not meet ≥1 criteria. Secondary end points included days to successful colonoscopy, preparation quality, polyp detection, and 10-year recall rate. Noninferiority against risk ratio value of 0.85 was tested using 1-sided alpha of 0.05. Results: A total of 1823 DAC and 828 OSC patients were eligible. DAC patients were younger, with a greater proportion of black patients and screening indications. For the outcome of successful colonoscopy, DAC was noninferior to OSC (DAC vs. OSC: 62.7% vs. 57.1%, RR 1.16, 95% LCL 1.09, P=0.001). For DAC, days to colonoscopy were fewer, and likelihood of 10-year recall after negative screening greater. Boston Score and polyp detection were similar for groups. Black patients were less likely to achieve successful colonoscopy; otherwise, groups were similar. For unsuccessful colonoscopies, proportionally more DAC patients canceled or no-showed while more OSC patients scheduled >90 days. DAC remained noninferior to OSC at 180 days. Conclusions: DAC was noninferior to OSC for achieving successful colonoscopy, comparing similarly in quality and efficiency outcomes.