Sukov, William R.

Abstract Rearrangements involving TCF3 (E2A) at 19p13.3 are a common cytogenetic abnormality in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-LL) across all age groups accounting for at least 5% of B-LL. The most common translocation partner, PBX1 at 1q23, is associated with an unbalanced der(19) or a balanced t(1;19) in 80% vs. 20% patients, respectively, and results in a PBX1/TCF3 fusion transcriptional activator. Several other rearrangement partners have been described, and as such TCF3 is approaching the dubious status of a "promiscuous" gene partner. Clinically, our laboratory uses a dual-color, dual fusion PBX1/TCF3 FISH probe to characterize the most common gene fusion; however, this FISH strategy also allows for the identification of atypical disruptions of the TCF3 gene region, and may suggest a gene partner based on abnormal metaphases/metaphase-FISH. Interrogation of our pediatric leukemia database (ages 0-30) identified 219 patients with abnormal TCF3 FISH results. We selected 23 samples for mate-pair evaluation to test the methodology, characterize novel rearrangements and identify new TCF3 fusion partners. In total, 19 patient samples were successfully sequenced by Mate-Pair, including 13 samples with variants of the 1;19 translocation. Of the samples with TCF3/PBX1 fusion, 3 patients demonstrated novel insertional translocation events characterized by mate-pair. A total of 6 samples with undefined/unknown TCF3 partner genes were evaluated. The mate-pair results identified 5 samples with a t(12;19)(p13.31;p13.3), resulting in TCF3/ZNF384 fusion. Interestingly, two of the ZNF384 rearrangements were observed in the unbalanced form, suggesting a similar mechanism related to the der(19)t(1;19) regularly observed in the common PBX1-TCF3 rearrangement. From a karyotype perspective, since these rearrangements result in only a small portion of chromosome 12p translocated onto distal 19p, this rearrangement would "cryptic" by conventional karyotyping. One patient sample demonstrated a new TCF3 gene fusion partner (TEF), associated with a t(19;22)(p13.3;q13.2). Overall, our results demonstrate the utility of mate-pair evaluation as an adjunct methodology in the identification of novel TCF3 rearrangements in B-LL. We have successfully expanded the application of mate-pair to characterize other novel/cryptic abnormalities in various hematologic and oncologic neoplasms encountered in our laboratory. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

3144 Background: Updated ASCO/CAP Guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer have been most impactful on the resolution of certain challenging groups of FISH results. We review the change in assignment of HER2 status in a large series of breast cancers referred to a large national reference laboratory for FISH testing since the introduction of the 2018 updated guidelines. Methods: Patient samples submitted to the Mayo Clinic Cytogenetics Laboratory (N = 2208) were analyzed by FISH. Samples with Group 2, Group 3, or Group 4 FISH results were reflexed to immunohistochemistry (IHC) in our central laboratory; FISH slides for those cases with equivocal 2+ IHC results were re-scored in the regions of invasive cancer showing more intense membranous staining. A subset of 202 samples with Group 4 FISH results were also reflexed to the previously employed reflex FISH assay (HER2/D17S122), and these were also re-analyzed according to the new reflex IHC/FISH process. Results: 382 of 2208 breast cancer samples tested (17.3%) had FISH results categorized as Group 2 (N = 17, 0.8%), Group 3 (N = 34, 1.5%), or Group 4 (N = 331, 15%) and required reflex IHC testing, and of those, 75% were 2+ equivocal and required targeted re-analysis of the FISH slide according to the 2018 updated guidelines. Re-analysis of the FISH slide resulted in switching between Groups 1-5 in 19.4% of cases, but HER2 status was changed by FISH re-scoring in only 7.7% of cases re-scored (1.0% of all samples), generally due to only minor shifts in HER2 copy number and HER2/control ratios between the initial and IHC-guided reflex FISH scores. In the subset of 202 cases tested by both reflex methods, the previously employed HER2/D17S122 reflex probe set was positive in 123 cases (60.9%), whereas reflex IHC/FISH was positive in only 10 cases (7.9%). Including positive reflex IHC (0.4%) and positive reflex FISH results (2.1%), the overall assignment of positive HER2 status on our series of 2208 cases was 11.5%. Conclusions: Overall rates of HER2 positive FISH results have declined under the most recent ASCO/CAP guideline update as a consequence of new recommendations for reflex testing for Groups 2-4. This change is largely due to reassignment of Group 2 and Group 4 results as negative in the absence of positive IHC.

Abstract OBJECTIVES Paragangliomas have unique features in the mediastinum, in part due to their location. Because of their paucity, they have not been thoroughly investigated. We studied the clinical, pathological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of mediastinal paragangliomas. METHODS Immunohistochemistry, next-generation sequencing mutation panel and the Oncoscan assay were performed. RESULTS Twenty-four patients with mediastinal paraganglioma (7 men, 29.2%) had a median age of 45.5 years (19.8–72.2). Twenty-one (87.5%) paragangliomas were completely resected. Six (of 24, 25.0%) tumours were considered metastatic. Mitotic activity occurred in 11 (of 24, 45.8%) paragangliomas. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (n = 23) was expressed in 6 (26%) patients in 10% (n = 2) and 1% (n = 4) of tumour cells, respectively. SDHB expression was lost in 19 (of 22, 86.4%) cases. ATRX expression was lost in 11 (of 23, 47.8%) cases. Next-generation sequencing revealed a single pathogenic mutation in 10 (of 19) specimens including SDHB (n = 4), SDHD (n = 6), SDHC (n = 1), ATRX (n = 1), and ≥2 mutations in 2 cases [SDHC and TERT (n = 1); SDHB, ATRX and TP53 (n = 1)]. Germline mutation analysis revealed the same succinate dehydrogenase mutation (or lack thereof) as identified in the paraganglioma in 11 (of 12) cases. During a median follow-up (n = 21) of 4.8 years (0.8–14.9), 3 patients developed metastases; 4 patients died, at least 1 of disease. CONCLUSIONS Mediastinal paragangliomas can be associated with morbidity and mortality. Many mediastinal paragangliomas have been reported to be associated with syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia, von Hippel-Lindau or succinate dehydrogenase syndrome with mutation profiles dominated by alterations in genes associated with these syndromes.

Subependymomas of the spinal cord are rare, do not often involve multiple levels, and very rarely recur. Here, we present a series of spinal cord subependymomas with a detailed description of the clinical, radiological and pathological features, and characterization by chromosomal microarray analysis. Briefly, the four patients included two men and two women, between the ages of 22 and 48 years. The most common presenting symptoms were neck and arm pain with upper extremity weakness. By imaging, the tumors were found to involve multiple spinal levels, including cervical/ cervico‐thoracic (three patients) and thoracic (one patient), were all eccentric, and had minimal to no post‐contrast enhancement. Two patients underwent gross total resection, one had a sub‐total resection, and one underwent biopsy alone with a decompressive laminectomy. Follow up ranged from 6 months to 22 years. One patient (case 4) had recurrence 15 years following gross total resection and chromosomal microarray analysis revealed deletions on the long arm of chromosome 6. Our limited series suggests that spinal cord subependymomas can rarely recur, even following gross total resection, suggesting a possible role for long‐term surveillance for these rare tumors.

ABSTRACTThe MLLT10 (formerly AF10) gene is the fourth most common KMT2A fusion partner across all acute leukemias and requires at least 3 breaks to form an in‐frame KMT2A/MLLT10 fusion due to the opposite orientation of each gene. A 10‐year retrospective review was performed to identify individuals from all age groups that harbor KMT2A/MLLT10 fusion obtained by our KMT2A/MLLT10 dual‐color dual‐fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (D‐FISH) assay. Of the 60 unique individuals identified, 31 were male and 29 were female (M:F ratio, 1.1:1) with ages ranging from 3 days to 86 years (mean 21.5 years, median 5.5 years). The diagnoses included acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (49 patients, 82%), B‐ or T‐lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (7 patients, 12%), myeloid sarcoma (3 patients, 5%), and a single case (2%) of undifferentiated leukemia. Twenty‐seven of 49 patients (55%) with AML were in the infant or pediatric age group. Fifty‐three of 60 patients (88%) had KMT2A/MLLT10 D‐FISH signal patterns mostly consisting of single fusions. In addition, 10 (26%) of 38 patients with conventional chromosome studies had “normal” (5 patients) or abnormal (5 patients) chromosome studies that lacked structural or numeric abnormalities involving chromosomes 10 or 11, implying cryptic cytogenetic mechanisms for KMT2A/MLLT10 fusion. Lastly, mate‐pair sequencing was performed on 4 AML cases, 2 of which had “normal” chromosome studies and cryptic KMT2A/MLLT10 fusion as detected by KMT2A/MLLT10 D‐FISH studies, and verified the multiple breaks required to generate KMT2A/MLLT10 fusion.

Background: Our purpose was to evaluate the prognostic impact of pathologically confirmed esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) and its association with HER2 status and clinicopathologic characteristics. Methods: Among 796 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection, surgical pathology reports were reviewed, and suspected ASC was confirmed utilizing p63 and CK5/6 immunostaining. HER2 status was determined using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cox models were used to assess the impact of ASC on disease-specific survival and overall survival. Results: Overall, 2.0% (16/796) of patients had esophageal ASC, mostly demonstrating a close intermingling of squamous and adenocarcinoma cells within the same tumor. The percentage of squamous versus adenocarcinoma cells in the primary was generally recapitulated in nodal metastases, and intrapatient internodal heterogeneity was uncommon. Patients with esophageal ASC were statistically significantly more likely to be female (vs. male), have normal (vs. excess) body mass index, and harbor HER2-negative (vs. positive) tumors, as compared with patients with adenocarcinoma only. No ASC tumor was HER2-positive as compared with 16% of adenocarcinoma only tumors (P=0.018). Compared with patients with adenocarcinoma only, those with ASC demonstrated profoundly worse disease-specific survival (5-year event-free rate, 34% vs. 6%; multivariate hazard ratio, 2.87 [95% confidence interval, 1.59-4.76]; P=0.0010) and overall survival (P=0.0027) that was independent of known prognostic factors and HER2 status. Conclusion: ASC identifies a rare aggressive HER2-negative subgroup of esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Context.— Pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor (PHAT) of soft parts, hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor (HFLT), and myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (MIFS) are 3 distinct entities of low-grade spindle cell mesenchymal neoplasm. These tumors have similar clinical presentations and partially overlapping but distinctive pathologic features. A recurrent translocation, t(1;10)(p22;q24), has been detected in a subset of PHAT, HFLT, MIFS, and HFLT/MIFS hybrid cases. Translocation t(1;10)(p22;q24) involves transforming growth factor β-receptor 3 (TGFBR3) and meningioma-expressed antigen 5 (MGEA5) genes on chromosomes 1p22 and 10q24, respectively. However, the percentage of translocation in PHAT, HFLT, and MIFS varies significantly among different studies. The relationship among these tumors has been a controversial topic among experts. Objective.— To discuss the diagnostic and functional significance of translocation t(1;10)(p22;q24) TGFBR3/MGEA5 rearrangement in HFLT, PHAT, and MIFS. Data Sources.— PubMed was used for this study. Conclusions.— Diagnosis of HFLT, PHAT, and MIFS is challenging because of a lack of unique morphologic, immunophenotypic, molecular, and cytogenetic markers. The recurrent t(1;10)(p22;q24) translocation and/or TGFBR3/MGEA5 rearrangement was reported in 55 patients, with a relatively even distribution among HFLT, PHAT, and MIFS (17 HFLT, 15 MIFS, 13 MIFS/HFLT, and 10 PHAT). This indicates that current morphology-based diagnostic criteria do not identify reliably the subset of soft tissue tumor with t(1;10) translocation. Genetic heterogeneity of these tumors is supported by the recent detection of a mutually exclusive, second recurrent genetic change, t(7;17) TOM1L2-BRAF translocation or BRAF amplification, in a subset of MIFS.