Reisdorf, Emily M.

Background Patients undergoing medical procedures benefit from preprocedural education. Objective To evaluate a multisensory virtual reality preoperative educational program for patients undergoing elective cardiovascular surgical procedures with postoperative recovery in the intensive care unit (ICU) and assess its impact on patients’ outcomes and experience. Methods Patients scheduled for elective cardiovascular surgical procedures with expected recovery in the ICU were enrolled. A multidisciplinary team designed the virtual reality simulation. Educational objectives focused on patient safety, family presence, ICU machinery and activities, reorientation, and communication with the care team. Historical control patients (n = 94) underwent medical record review and were contacted to complete surveys. Virtual reality simulation patients (n = 44) underwent medical record review, viewed the simulation at a preoperative appointment, and completed surveys. The study included patients admitted from June 4, 2019, to May 12, 2022. Results Durations of postoperative sedation and mechanical ventilation were lower in patients receiving virtual reality simulation. Most patients in the virtual reality simulation group (92%) said the simulation alleviated their anxiety and helped them understand what to expect in the ICU. The simulation improved their feeling of safety and decreased their fear of the unknown. Delirium incidence was not different in the 2 groups. Conclusions Preprocedural education via virtual reality simulation can improve the experience and outcomes of patients undergoing elective cardiothoracic surgery with recovery in the ICU.

Background While in the intensive care unit, critically ill patients experience a myriad of distressing symptoms and stimuli leading to discomfort, a negative emotional and/ or physical state that arises in response to noxious stimuli. Appropriate management of these symptoms requires a distinct assessment of discomfort-causing experiences. Objectives To assess patient-reported discomfort among critically ill patients with the English-language version of the Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation questionnaire, and to explore relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and overall discomfort score on this instrument. Methods This study had a cross-sectional, descriptive, single-cohort design. The convenience sample consisted of alert and oriented patients aged 18 years or older who had been admitted to intensive care units at a Midwestern tertiary referral hospital and were invited to participate. An 18-item questionnaire on physiological and psychological stimuli inducing discomfort was administered once. Each item was scored from 0 to 10, with the total possible discomfort score ranging from 0 to 100. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participants’ demographic and clinical characteristics and questionnaire responses. Results A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The mean (SD) overall discomfort score was 32.9 (23.6). The greatest sources of discomfort were sleep deprivation (mean [SD] score, 4.0 [3.4]), presence of perfusion catheters and tubing (3.4 [2.9]), thirst (3.0 [3.3]), and pain (3.0 [3.0]). Conclusions Intensive care unit patients in this study reported mild to moderate discomfort. Additional research is needed to design and test interventions based on assessment of specific discomfort-promoting stimuli to provide effective symptom management.