Background Patients undergoing medical procedures benefit from preprocedural education. Objective To evaluate a multisensory virtual reality preoperative educational program for patients undergoing elective cardiovascular surgical procedures with postoperative recovery in the intensive care unit (ICU) and assess its impact on patients’ outcomes and experience. Methods Patients scheduled for elective cardiovascular surgical procedures with expected recovery in the ICU were enrolled. A multidisciplinary team designed the virtual reality simulation. Educational objectives focused on patient safety, family presence, ICU machinery and activities, reorientation, and communication with the care team. Historical control patients (n = 94) underwent medical record review and were contacted to complete surveys. Virtual reality simulation patients (n = 44) underwent medical record review, viewed the simulation at a preoperative appointment, and completed surveys. The study included patients admitted from June 4, 2019, to May 12, 2022. Results Durations of postoperative sedation and mechanical ventilation were lower in patients receiving virtual reality simulation. Most patients in the virtual reality simulation group (92%) said the simulation alleviated their anxiety and helped them understand what to expect in the ICU. The simulation improved their feeling of safety and decreased their fear of the unknown. Delirium incidence was not different in the 2 groups. Conclusions Preprocedural education via virtual reality simulation can improve the experience and outcomes of patients undergoing elective cardiothoracic surgery with recovery in the ICU.
Description of Pharmacogenomic Testing Among Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit After Cardiovascular Surgery
Background: Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing has the potential to provide information on specific drug-metabolizing enzymes that may lead to an absence, reduction, or increase in medication effect in patients. There is a paucity of prospective studies examining PGx testing in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Research Aims: To (1) obtain a PGx panel in a sample of cardiovascular (CV) surgical patients with a planned ICU stay and identify phenotypes, and (2) identify PGx variants that may inform treatment regimens and may warrant prescribing adjustments. Design and Methods: Descriptive, single cohort cross-sectional design. Adult (≥18 years) CV patients with an anticipated postoperative ICU stay were enrolled from a large Midwestern tertiary academic medical center. Eligible patients provided informed consent at the time of their CV clinic appointment; PGx testing was then ordered. Pharmacogenomic testing consisted of the Focused Pharmacogenomics panel which included 10 genes and 55 medications. Results: Of the 272 patients screened, 100 (68% male) patients completed PGx testing (mean age 66.2 ± 9.6 years, mean Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation III score 76.1 ± standard deviation). Pharmacogenomic results were available in the medical record within a median of 52.4 hours (interquartile range: 33.4-80.3). Pharmacogenomic testing results identified 5 CYP2C19 poor metabolizers, 26 CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers, 5 CYP2C19 ultrarapid metabolizers, 6 CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, 5 CYP2D6 poor to intermediate metabolizers, and 2 CYP2D6 rapid metabolizers identified. Overall, 98% of patients had actionable or potentially actionable PGx results, including 82% for warfarin, 65% for propafenone, 65% for tramadol, 46% for oxycodone, 45% for metoprolol, 33% for clopidogrel, 32% for proton pump inhibitors, 25% for statins, and 12% for haloperidol. Conclusions: A significant portion of patients had identified genetic variants that may warrant changes in medication management during and after CV-ICU stay. It remains to be seen if PGx testing leads to improvements in ICU patient outcomes.
3: DESCRIPTION OF PHARMACOGENOMIC TESTING IN A COHORT OF CARDIOVASCULAR ICU SURGICAL PATIENTS