Talpaz, Moshe

7061 Background: Glasdegib is a small molecule inhibitor of the Sonic Hedgehog pathway, and data from the single arm, lead-in cohort of a phase 1b/2 trial in myelofibrosis (MF) are shown. Methods: Patients (age ≥18 yrs) with primary/secondary MF previously-treated with ≥1 Janus Kinase inhibitor (JAKi) were enrolled and received glasdegib 100 mg QD orally in 28 day cycles. AEs and laboratory abnormalities were assessed. Key efficacy endpoints were proportion of patients with spleen volume reduction (SVR) ≥35% and ≥50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) measured by the MPN Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24. Results: 21 patients were enrolled between Oct '14-Oct '15 in this ongoing study. Mean age was 69.3 yrs (range 58-83). Median duration of treatment was 85 days (22-343). 52% were refractory patients with inadequate response to prior JAKi. Baseline symptoms were mostly mild (1-4), except fatigue (>4). No patients achieved SVR ≥35%, 5 patients had some SVR (maximum 2.3-21.4% reduction from baseline), and no progressive disease prior to Day 71. At week 24, 1 patient had ≥50% reduction in TSS, but 3/21 and 4/21, respectively showed 30% and 20% TSS reduction. Of 14 patients with severe baseline symptoms (1 with ≥5, or ≥2 with ≥3), 1, 1, and 2 achieved 50%, 30%, and 20% TSS reduction, respectively at week 24. TSS, spleen-related, and constitutional symptom scores showed a trend of reduction over 24 weeks with spleen-related symptoms, inactivity, and fatigue showing greatest improvement (52%, 58%, and 36%, respectively). Dysgeusia (N=13), muscle spasms (N=12), alopecia (N=8), decreased appetite (N=7), fatigue (N=7), lipase increase (N=5), and weight decrease (N=5) occurred in ≥20% patients. None, except 1 episode of fatigue, were considered serious AEs. Glasdegib steady state PK was consistent with previous single agent data. Conclusions: Glasdegib has an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with primary/secondary MF previously treated with JAKi. Symptom responder definition for refractory patients may not be the same as for JAKi naïve patients. Patient reported symptom improvement may be a more sensitive indicator of treatment benefit vs SVR. Further study of glasdegib may be warranted. Clinical Trial Information: NCT02226172.

Key PointsINCB040093 was active across lymphoma subtypes, and the addition of itacitinib provided substantial activity in classic Hodgkin lymphoma. INCB040093 ± itacitinib had a manageable safety and tolerability profile; severe hepatic adverse effects were less common with the combination.

Abstract Janus kinase-2 (JAK2)/STAT pathway activation is commonly observed in myeloproliferative neoplasms and plays an important role in disease development and progression. The V617F activating mutation in the JAK2 pseudokinase domain is found in 95% of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and in 50-70% of patients with primary myelofibrosis (MF) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). Studies have shown the clinical efficacy of JAK2 inhibitors in treating MF in terms of a reduction in splenomegaly and relief of constitutional symptoms. A reduction in the JAK2V617F allele burden after treatment with a JAK2-targeted agent could be a surrogate for a disease-modifying effect of this therapy. To demonstrate this, a robust method that can accurately measure the JAK2V617F allele burden is required. Here, we report the development of a sensitive quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay to determine the JAK2V617F allele burden in patients treated with SAR302503, the validation of the assay in a Phase 0 clinical study and implementation in a phase II study using samples from patients with MF. The assay demonstrated robust performance, with high sensitivity (LLOD=0.05% and LLOQ=0.5%) and accuracy. A phase 0 study in MF, PV, and ET patients showed that (1) there was minimal intra-subject sampling variability in JAK2V617F allele burden, and (2) whole-blood samples are stable for at least 48 hours at ambient conditions for DNA preparation without a significant impact on JAK2V617F allele burden measurement.Of the 31 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF enrolled in a phase II clinical study (NCT01420770), baseline samples were available for 29 patients and of these, 26 were JAK2V617F-positive using this assay. Of the 19/26 patients for whom samples were available at all 3 time points, the median allele burden was 93% at baseline, 87% at the end of Cycle 3, and 78% at the end of Cycle 6. Among the 24 patients who were JAK2V617F-positive and for whom spleen measurements were available at the end of Cycle 6, a total of 15 (63%) had a spleen response (≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume by MRI versus baseline). In contrast, two JAK2V617F-negative patients did not have a spleen response. Patients with baseline allele burden levels of 0 to <25%, 25% to 75%, and ≥75% showed spleen response rates of 50%, 44%, and 69%, respectively, at the end of Cycle 6. JAK2V617F allele burden will continue to be assessed every 3 cycles. Longer follow up is needed to determine the clinical effect of allele burden reduction. Citation Format: Feng Liu, Moshe Talpaz, Animesh Pardanani, Catriona Jamieson, Nashat Gabrail, Ayalew Tefferi, Tianlei Lei, Rita Greco, Francisco Adrian, Nikki Daskalakis, Claudia Lebedinsky, Pamela Cohen, Donald Bergstrom. Determination of JAK2V617F allele burden in a phase II study of patients with myelofibrosis treated with SAR302503 using a sensitive and robust allele-specific qPCR assay. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-294. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-294

SummaryMyelofibrosis (MF) patients can present with a wide spectrum of disease characteristics. We analysed the consistency of ruxolitinib efficacy across patient subgroups in the COntrolled MyeloFibrosis Study With ORal JAK Inhibitor Treatment (COMFORT‐I,) a double‐blind trial, where patients with intermediate‐2 or high‐risk MF were randomized to twice‐daily oral ruxolitinib (n = 155) or placebo (n = 154). Subgroups analysed included MF subtype (primary, post‐polycythaemia vera, post‐essential thrombocythaemia), age (≤65, > 65 years), International Prognostic Scoring System risk group, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0, 1, ≥2), JAK2 V617F mutation (positive, negative), baseline haemoglobin level (≥100, <100 g/l), baseline platelet count (100–200 × 109/l, >200 × 109/l), baseline palpable spleen size (≤10, >10 cm), and baseline quartile of spleen volume and Total Symptom Score (TSS; Q1 = lowest, Q4 = highest). Mean percentage change from baseline to week 24 in spleen volume and TSS were calculated for ruxolitinib and placebo in each subgroup. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier method according to original randomization group. In ruxolitinib‐treated patients, reductions in spleen volume and TSS and evidence of improved survival relative to placebo across subgroups were consistent with those seen in the COMFORT‐I population, confirming that ruxolitinib is an effective therapy for the spectrum of MF patients studied in COMFORT‐I.

Purpose To assess the effects of ruxolitinib on symptom burden and quality of life (QoL) and to evaluate the ability of the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 to measure meaningful changes in myelofibrosis-related symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis. Patients and Methods COMFORT-I (Controlled Myelofibrosis Study With Oral JAK Inhibitor Treatment–I) is a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluating ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis. Exploratory analyses were conducted on the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessments: modified MFSAF v2.0 (individual symptoms and Total Symptom Score [TSS]), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Results Patients receiving ruxolitinib experienced improvements in individual myelofibrosis-related symptoms, although patients receiving placebo experienced worsening (P < .001). The majority (91%) of ruxolitinib-treated patients designated as ≥ 50% TSS responders (≥ 50% TSS improvement) self-reported their condition as either “Much improved” or “Very much improved” on the PGIC. These patients achieved significant improvements in the EORTC QLQ-C30 functional domains and Global Health Status/QoL versus patients receiving placebo, who experienced worsening on these measures (P ≤ .0135). Ruxolitinib-treated patients with a lesser degree of symptom improvement (< 50% TSS responders) also achieved improvements over placebo on these measures. The degree of spleen volume reduction with ruxolitinib correlated with improvements in TSS, PGIC, PROMIS Fatigue Scale, and EORTC Global Health Status/QoL. Ruxolitinib-treated patients who achieved a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume experienced the greatest improvements in these PROs. Conclusion Ruxolitinib-treated patients achieved clinically meaningful improvements in myelofibrosis-related symptoms and QoL, but patients receiving placebo reported worsening of symptoms and other PROs.