Back to Authors

Leopold, Lance

Mayo Clinic

Incyte (United States)

Citations 4

Exploring the safety, effect on the tumor microenvironment, and efficacy of itacitinib in combination with epacadostat or parsaclisib in advanced solid tumors: a phase I study
Naing, Aung , Powderly, John D. , Nemunaitis, John , Luke, Jason J. , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Messersmith, Wells A. , Sahebjam, Solmaz , LoRusso, Patricia , Garrido‐Laguna, Ignacio , Leopold, Lance, Geschwindt, Ryan, Ding, Kai , Smith, Michael , Nemunaitis, John J , Mansfield, Aaron S , Luke, Jason J , Berlin, Jordan D.

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | March 14, 2022 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 3 | Pages: e004223

10.1136/jitc-2021-004223 Get It

Background This phase I multicenter study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and translational effects on the tumor microenvironment of itacitinib (Janus-associated kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor) in combination with epacadostat (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitor) or parsaclisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ) inhibitor). Methods Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were enrolled and received itacitinib (100–400 mg once a day) plus epacadostat (50–300 mg two times per day; group A), or itacitinib (100–400 mg once a day) plus parsaclisib or parsaclisib monotherapy (0.3–10 mg once a day; group B). Results A total of 142 patients were enrolled in the study. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached for either the combination of itacitinib plus epacadostat (n=47) or itacitinib plus parsaclisib (n=90). One dose-limiting toxicity of serious, grade 3 aseptic meningitis was reported in a patient receiving itacitinib 300 mg once a day plus parsaclisib 10 mg once a day, which resolved when the study drugs were withdrawn. The most common treatment-related adverse events among patients treated with itacitinib plus epacadostat included fatigue, nausea, pyrexia, and vomiting, and for patients treated with itacitinib plus parsaclisib were fatigue, pyrexia, and diarrhea. In the itacitinib plus epacadostat group, no patient had an objective response. Among patients receiving itacitinib 100 mg once a day plus parsaclisib 0.3 mg once a day, three achieved partial response for an objective response rate (95% CI) of 7.1% (1.50 to 19.48). Treatment with itacitinib plus epacadostat demonstrated some increase in tumor CD8+ T cell infiltration and minor changes in six plasma proteins, whereas treatment with itacitinib plus high-dose parsaclisib resulted in downregulation of 20 plasma proteins mostly involved in immune cell function, with no observed change in intratumoral CD8+ T cell infiltration. Conclusion Adverse events with JAK1 inhibition combined with either IDO1 or PI3Kδ inhibition were manageable, but the combinations demonstrated limited clinical activity or enhancement of immune activation in the tumor microenvironment. Trial registration number NCT02559492.
Interim analysis of a phase I study of INCB040093, a PI3Kδ inhibitor, alone or in combination with INCB039110, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancies.
Forero‐Torres, Andres , Sher, Taimur , Scherle, Peggy , Schaub, Richard, Zhou, Li , Pulini, Jennifer, Leopold, Lance, Spear, Matthew A. , Phillips, Tycel , Diefenbach, Catherine , Talpaz, Moshe , Barr, Paul M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 22, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 8520-8520

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.8520 Get It

A phase 1 study of INCB040093, a PI3Kδ inhibitor, alone or in combination with INCB039110, a selective JAK1 inhibitor: Interim results from patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).
Forero‐Torres, Andres , Sher, Taimur , Schaub, Richard, Zhou, Li , Pulini, Jennifer, Leopold, Lance, Spear, Matthew A. , Barr, Paul M. , Diefenbach, Catherine , Talpaz, Moshe , Phillips, Tycel

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 19, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 8558-8558

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.8558 Get It

Randomized Phase II Multicenter Trial of Two Schedules of Lapatinib as First- or Second-Line Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Ross, Helen J. , Blumenschein, George R. , Aisner, Joseph , Damjanov, Nevena , Dowlati, Afshin , Garst, Jennifer, Rigas, James R. , Smylie, Michael , Hassani, Habib, Allen, Kimberly E., Leopold, Lance, Zaks, Tal, Shepherd, Frances Alice

Clinical Cancer Research | March 9, 2010 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1938-1949

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-3328 Get It

Abstract Purpose: This randomized phase II study was initially designed to test the activity of two dose schedules of lapatinib (GW572016H), an oral, reversible, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human EGFR-2 (HER2/neu; HER2), in chemotherapy-naive patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); it was later amended to target patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma or no smoking history. Experimental Design: Patients with good performance status and recurrent or metastatic NSCLC were randomized to lapatinib (orally, 1,500 mg once daily or 500 mg twice daily) until progression or intolerance. Patients could have had a maximum of one prior systemic therapy (chemotherapy or biological therapy) for NSCLC. Safety and activity were assessed every 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Tumors were analyzed for EGFR and HER2 mutations and/or amplifications. Results: Of 75 patients in the nontargeted population, 1 (1.3%) had partial response and 16 (21%) had stable disease of ≥24 weeks. No complete or partial responses were observed in 56 patients in the targeted population; 14 (25%) had stable disease of ≥24 weeks. No responses were seen in three patients with EGFR mutations and five with EGFR gene amplification. No mutations in HER2 were found. One of two patients with HER2 amplification had a 51% decrease in tumor size; however, this response was unconfirmed. The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 diarrhea, rash, fatigue, nausea, and anorexia. Adverse events were similar across dosing regimens. Conclusions: Lapatinib was well tolerated, with no notable difference in toxicity between treatment groups. Lapatinib monotherapy did not induce a significant number of tumor regressions in NSCLC. Further studies may be warranted to determine whether lapatinib is active in combination with other agents in the treatment of NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res; 16(6); 1938–49