Johnson, Noah R.

AbstractBackgroundThe ALLFTD (ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration) study is an NIH‐funded effort to prepare for clinical trials in sporadic (s‐FTLD) and familial (f‐FTLD) FTLD syndromes by characterizing cohorts, developing new clinical trial outcome measures, and evaluating disease progression. To understand disease trajectories in the context of potential preventative or disease‐modifying therapeutic agents, comprehensive evaluation across multiple time‐points is crucial.MethodALLFTD evaluates participants with FTLD spectrum disorders (bvFTD, svPPA, nfvPPA, FTD‐ALS, CBS, PSP), with strong family histories of FTLD, or known FTLD‐associated genetic variants within the family. ALLFTD has expanded to include 28 expert sites in North America conducting clinical and neuropsychological evaluations, MR Imaging, blood draws, and CSF collection in willing participants, providing detailed data on participant status and disease progression. Participants are asked to return for annual evaluations. The central data management staff assist sites in retention efforts by providing monthly reports of follow‐up visits that are pending, due, or overdue, based on a 15‐month period from previous visit.ResultSince enrollment began in January 2020, ALLFTD has conducted 1363 baseline visits, including 339 participants previously enrolled in ALLFTD’s predecessor studies (ARTFL and LEFFTDS). Excluding individuals not anticipated to return due to disease progression (123), participant death (55), or recent enrollment (<15 months; 318), ALLFTD has a retention rate of 83% for a second visit despite early enrollment occurring during COVID restrictions. Retention rates for third and fourth visits are even higher (90% and 97% respectively), suggesting a high degree of engagement in longitudinal participants. Including historic data from ARTFL and LEFFTDS, >1000 participants have multiple visits.ConclusionLongitudinal assessment of clinical and biomarker profiles in f‐FTLD and s‐FTLD can inform models of disease onset and progression, allowing analysis of disease trajectories and identification of the most sensitive clinical outcome measures over time. ALLFTD has been successful at recruiting and retaining a large active cohort to obtain detailed clinical and biomarker characterizations; data are available by request.

ImportanceFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is relatively rare, behavioral and motor symptoms increase travel burden, and standard neuropsychological tests are not sensitive to early-stage disease. Remote smartphone-based cognitive assessments could mitigate these barriers to trial recruitment and success, but no such tools are validated for FTLD.ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of smartphone-based cognitive measures for remote FTLD evaluations.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this cohort study conducted from January 10, 2019, to July 31, 2023, controls and participants with FTLD performed smartphone application (app)–based executive functioning tasks and an associative memory task 3 times over 2 weeks. Observational research participants were enrolled through 18 centers of a North American FTLD research consortium (ALLFTD) and were asked to complete the tests remotely using their own smartphones. Of 1163 eligible individuals (enrolled in parent studies), 360 were enrolled in the present study; 364 refused and 439 were excluded. Participants were divided into discovery (n = 258) and validation (n = 102) cohorts. Among 329 participants with data available on disease stage, 195 were asymptomatic or had preclinical FTLD (59.3%), 66 had prodromal FTLD (20.1%), and 68 had symptomatic FTLD (20.7%) with a range of clinical syndromes.ExposureParticipants completed standard in-clinic measures and remotely administered ALLFTD mobile app (app) smartphone tests.Main Outcomes and MeasuresInternal consistency, test-retest reliability, association of smartphone tests with criterion standard clinical measures, and diagnostic accuracy.ResultsIn the 360 participants (mean [SD] age, 54.0 [15.4] years; 209 [58.1%] women), smartphone tests showed moderate-to-excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.77-0.95). Validity was supported by association of smartphones tests with disease severity (r range, 0.38-0.59), criterion-standard neuropsychological tests (r range, 0.40-0.66), and brain volume (standardized β range, 0.34-0.50). Smartphone tests accurately differentiated individuals with dementia from controls (area under the curve [AUC], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.90-0.96]) and were more sensitive to early symptoms (AUC, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76-0.88]) than the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (AUC, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.59-0.78]) (z of comparison, −2.49 [95% CI, −0.19 to −0.02]; P = .01). Reliability and validity findings were highly similar in the discovery and validation cohorts. Preclinical participants who carried pathogenic variants performed significantly worse than noncarrier family controls on 3 app tasks (eg, 2-back β = −0.49 [95% CI, −0.72 to −0.25]; P &amp;lt; .001) but not a composite of traditional neuropsychological measures (β = −0.14 [95% CI, −0.42 to 0.14]; P = .32).Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this cohort study suggest that smartphones could offer a feasible, reliable, valid, and scalable solution for remote evaluations of FTLD and may improve early detection. Smartphone assessments should be considered as a complementary approach to traditional in-person trial designs. Future research should validate these results in diverse populations and evaluate the utility of these tests for longitudinal monitoring.

Abstract Background The ALLFTD (ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontemporal Lobar Degeneration) study is an NIH‐funded effort to prepare for clinical trials in sporadic (s‐FTLD) and familial (f‐FTLD) FTLD syndromes by characterizing cohorts, developing new clinical trial outcome measures, and evaluating disease progression. ALLFTD represents the merger and continuation of two prior studies: Advancing Research and Treatment of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS). Methods ALLFTD recruits participants with FTLD spectrum disorders (bvFTD, svPPA, nfvPPA, FTD‐ALS, CBS or PSP), with strong family histories of FTLD, or known FTLD‐associated genetic variants within the family. 26 sites in North America enroll participants for clinical and neuropsychological evaluations, MR Imaging, blood draws, and CSF collection in willing participants; participants are requested to return annually for follow‐up evaluation. All participants are genotyped for dementia‐associated mutations. Participants also enroll in the FTD Disorders Registry for follow‐up surveys. A subset of participants undergo remote assessment via the ALLFTD app. Visits conducted under ARTFL and LEFFTDS are included in the ALLFTD dataset. Results ALLFTD has been successful in developing methods to conduct remote or hybrid visits and in actively evaluating participants. Since ALLFTD began in January 2020, 1034 participants (736 new; 298 previously enrolled in ARTFL or LEFFTDS) have been evaluated in the longitudinal arm; an additional 119 participants have been participated in a shortened, biofluid‐focused visit. 349 have returned for follow‐up visits. Including prior participants, the ALLFTD dataset contains 3871 visits from 2343 individuals. 1277 people have sporadic syndromes; 1045 were enrolled as familial. Among s‐FTLD, bvFTD is the most common phenotype (32.8%) followed by PSP (15.9%). 61.4% of f‐FTLD participants were clinically normal at first visit; bvFTD is the most common syndrome in symptomatic f‐FTLD (40%). 477 are confirmed carriers of FTLD‐associated genetic mutations. MRIs were obtained for 2594 visits; 3492 visits have associated blood biospecimens banked; 978 visits have associated CSF samples. Conclusions The ALLFTD consortium is actively evaluating participants across North America to better characterize FTLD syndromes and support the planning and development of FTLD clinical trials. Longitudinal datasets including clinical, genetic, and imaging data are available by request.

AbstractBackgroundMemory impairment is generally considered minimal to absent in those with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). We sought to assess the frequencies of subjective and objective memory impairment in individuals with mild bvFTD according to consensus criteria.MethodAssessments were performed in mildly symptomatic bvFTD [defined by global FTLD Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR®+NACC FTLD) = 1] mutation carriers (Familial) and non‐mutation carriers (Sporadic) who are participants in the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD, www.allftd.org) study. Mutation carriers had a pathogenic mutation in the MAPT, GRN or C9orf72 gene. The presence of subjective memory impairment was defined by a rating >0 on the memory domain of the CDR®+NACC FTLD. Evidence of objective memory impairment was based on performance across 7 memory measures, which include the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set Version 3 – Craft Story Immediate Recall (CSImm) and Delayed Recall (CSDel), Benson Figure Delayed Recall (BenDel), and the California Verbal Learning Test – Learning (CVLearn), Immediate Recall (CVImm), Delayed Recall (CVDel), and Recognition (CVRecog). Performance was considered abnormal for z‐scores ≤ ‐1.5.ResultData from 38 Familial (mean age 60±8 years, 61% male), and 109 Sporadic (mean age 63±7 years, 70% male) participants were analyzed. Memory ratings >0 on the CDR®+NACC FTLD were common for both Familial (84%) and Sporadic (88%). The frequencies of abnormal performance in the Familial vs Sporadic groups, respectively, per memory measure were: CSImm 43.8% vs 45.9%, p = 0.83; CSDel 46.9% vs 52.6%, p = 0.58; BenDel 29.4% vs 46.4%, p = 0.08; CVLearn 54.8% vs 39.8, p = 0.14; CVImm 64.5% vs 50%, p = 0.16, CVDel 80.6% vs 55.1%, p = 0.01, and CVRecog 51.6 vs 49%, p = 0.80. The frequencies of abnormal performance did not differ (all p>0.05) between Familial and Sporadic for ≥2 tests (79.3% vs 67.7%), ≥4 tests (55.2% vs 44.1%) and ≥6 tests (34.5% vs 31.2%).ConclusionThese data suggest that among those with a mild global severity of bvFTD features: 1) subjective and objective memory impairment are relatively frequent, and 2) the frequency of impairment across memory measures is largely similar between familial and sporadic bvFTD. The presence of memory impairment should not preclude a diagnosis of bvFTD.