Back to Authors

Herscovitch, Peter

Mayo Clinic

National Institutes of Health

Citations 2

Updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid and tau PET: A report from the Alzheimer's Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup
Rabinovici, Gil D. , Knopman, David S., Donohoe, Kevin, Herscovitch, Peter, Kuo, Phillip H. , Lingler, Jennifer H. , Price, Julie C. , Salloway, Stephen P., Weber, Christopher J., Carrillo, María C. , Johnson, Keith A. , Rabinovici, Gil D , Arbizu, Javier , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Hansson, Oskar , Minoshima, Satoshi , Murray, Melissa E.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 8, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14338 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Alzheimer's Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a multidisciplinary workgroup to update appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and to develop AUC for tau PET. METHODS The workgroup identified key research questions that guided a systematic literature review on clinical amyloid/tau PET. Building on this review, the workgroup developed 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid or tau PET may be considered. A modified Delphi approach was used to rate each scenario by consensus as “rarely appropriate,” “uncertain,” or “appropriate.” Ratings were performed separately for amyloid and tau PET as stand‐alone modalities. RESULTS For amyloid PET, seven scenarios were rated as appropriate, two as uncertain, and eight as rarely appropriate. For tau PET, five scenarios were rated as appropriate, six as uncertain, and six as rarely appropriate. DISCUSSION AUC for amyloid and tau PET provide expert recommendations for clinical use of these technologies in the evolving landscape of diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease. Highlights A multidisciplinary workgroup convened by the Alzheimer's Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging updated the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and to develop AUC for tau PET. The goal of these updated AUC is to assist clinicians in identifying clinical scenarios in which amyloid or tau PET may be useful for guiding the diagnosis and management of patients who have, or are at risk for, cognitive decline These updated AUC are intended for dementia specialists who spend a significant proportion of their clinical effort caring for patients with cognitive complaints, as well as serve as a general reference for a broader audience interested in implementation of amyloid and tau PET in clinical practice.
Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET
Donohoe, Kevin, Herscovitch, Peter, Kuo, Phillip H. , Lingler, Jennifer H. , Price, Julie C. , Salloway, Stephen , Weber, Christopher J., Johnson, Keith A. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Knopman, David S. , Arbizu, Javier , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Hansson, Oskar , Minoshima, Satoshi , Murray, Melissa E. , Carrillo, María C.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2023 | Volume: 19 | Issue: S14 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.078912 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a Workgroup to update previous Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for amyloid PET (Johnson 2013) and develop the first AUC for tau PET. The AUC represent general guidelines and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment exercised in the care of individual patients.MethodThe Workgroup included 14 researchers with multidisciplinary expertise. Meetings were held between June 2020 and August 2021. Key research questions were identified using the PICOTS framework, triggering an independent systematic literature review. Using established methods (Fitch 2001), the Workgroup identified 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid/tau PET may be considered. Appropriateness of amyloid and tau PET as independent, stand‐alone modalities were ranked for each scenario using a 9‐point scale (Table 1). Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi process. Online surveys were completed iteratively by Workgroup members, followed by discussion, until all votes for each scenario fell within one of the following categories: Appropriate/Uncertain/Rarely Appropriate.ResultAs an over‐arching principle, amyloid/tau PET should be considered in patients who: (1) have undergone a comprehensive assessment by a dementia expert; (2) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a diagnostic possibility but uncertainty remains; and (3) knowledge of amyloid/tau PET results is expected to help establish diagnosis and guide patient management. Consensus ratings for clinical scenarios are shown in Table 2. More evidence was available to inform recommendations for amyloid than tau PET. Amyloid PET was considered “Appropriate” to inform diagnosis of MCI or dementia due to suspected AD; clarify diagnosis when CSF biomarkers are equivocal; to inform prognosis in MCI; and to determine eligibility for amyloid‐targeting therapies. Tau PET was considered “Appropriate” to clarify diagnosis in patients with MCI/dementia under age 65 or those with atypical presentations; and to inform prognosis in MCI or dementia due to suspected AD.ConclusionThe updated AUC highlight a growing role for amyloid PET and an emerging role for tau PET in the clinical evaluation of cognitively impaired patients. AUC are expected to further evolve based on data from ongoing studies of clinical utility and a rapidly developing therapeutic landscape.