Coppola, Giovanni

AbstractBackgroundThe 17q21.31 region with various structural forms characterized by the H1/H2 haplotypes and three large copy number variations (CNVs) represents the strongest risk locus in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP).ObjectiveTo investigate the association between CNVs and structural forms on 17q.21.31 with the risk of PSP.MethodsUtilizing whole genome sequencing data from 1684 PSP cases and 2392 controls, the three large CNVs (α, β, and γ) and structural forms within 17q21.31 were identified and analyzed for their association with PSP.ResultsWe found that the copy number of γ was associated with increased PSP risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10, P = 0.0018). From H1β1γ1 (OR = 1.21) and H1β2γ1 (OR = 1.24) to H1β1γ4 (OR = 1.57), structural forms of H1 with additional copies of γ displayed a higher risk for PSP. The frequency of the risk sub‐haplotype H1c rises from 1% in individuals with two γ copies to 88% in those with eight copies. Additionally, γ duplication up‐regulates expression of ARL17B, LRRC37A/LRRC37A2, and NSFP1, while down‐regulating KANSL1. Single‐nucleus RNA‐seq of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex analysis reveals γ duplication primarily up‐regulates LRRC37A/LRRC37A2 in neuronal cells.ConclusionsThe copy number of γ is associated with the risk of PSP after adjusting for H1/H2, indicating that the complex structure at 17q21.31 is an important consideration when evaluating the genetic risk of PSP. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

AbstractBackgroundAs new anti‐amyloid immunotherapies emerge for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is clear that early diagnosis of AD pathology is crucial for treatment success. This can be challenging in atypical presentations of AD and, together with our reliance on CSF or PET scans, can, at times, lead to delayed diagnosis. Here, we further explore the possible role of plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (P‐tau217) for the detection of primary AD or AD co‐pathology when frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders are the main clinical presentation.MethodParticipants were recruited through ALLFTD, a North American multisite research consortium for the longitudinal assessment of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. After excluding cases with known FTD‐causing mutations, 573 participants with sporadic disease, mild cognitive/behavioral impairment, or healthy familial controls evaluated between 2014 and 2023 were included in this analysis (45.8% female, median age 66 years). 39 of those cases underwent neuropathological evaluation. Plasma P‐tau217 was measured with the Eli Lilly electrochemiluminescence‐based assay. P‐tau217 concentrations were compared by phenotype, disease severity, genotype, and, when available, neuropathological diagnosis with non‐parametric tests. Its diagnostic performance was tested with ROC curves. Associations between plasma P‐tau217 concentrations and clinical scales of global cognition, memory, executive function, motor function, and social cognition with linear regressions and non‐parametric tests.ResultPlasma P‐tau217 concentrations were higher in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) and amnestic dementia (AmDem), compared to participants with normal cognition or other FTD phenotypes. P‐tau217 concentrations were higher in APOE e4 carriers, compared to non‐carriers, regardless of phenotype, but were not affected by disease severity. P‐tau217 concentrations showed associations with clinical measures of global cognition, memory, and executive function, but had no associations with measures of motor function or social cognition. Plasma P‐tau217 concentrations were elevated in high and intermediate ADNC scoring, or more advanced Braak stages, even when AD was not the primary pathology.ConclusionEven when FTD is suspected, high plasma p‐tau 217 concentrations are strongly associated with underlying AD as primary pathology or contributing co‐pathology. Plasma P‐tau217 could be a tool to support the development of disease‐modifying therapies for atypical Alzheimer’s disease presentations or for FTD cases with Alzheimer’s disease co‐pathology.

AbstractBackgroundThe ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) research consortium is actively enrolling participants across 23 North American centers to characterize sporadic and familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and prepare for disease‐modifying clinical trials. The ability to identify, otherwise unknown, relatives among these participants is critical to rigorously build family structures for downstream clinical and genetic research studies.MethodsGenome‐wide SNP genotyping data from ALLFTD participants was used to perform lineage analyses using PLINK. Briefly, QC was performed to remove individuals with low call rate and filter autosomal SNPs for missingness, allele frequency, and deviation from Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium, before pruning SNPs for linkage disequilibrium. Identity‐by‐descent (IBD) estimates were then calculated for determining relatedness, followed by family‐network identification and pedigree reconstruction using PRIMUS.ResultsAbout 46% of ALLFTD participants that were genotyped and passed QC (n = 1,453) had reported a family history, while 50% (n = 721) did not and were considered sporadic. We identified a total of 460 participants that had at least one relative who was second degree or closer (PI_HAT>0.1875) based on IBD sharing, resulting in 150 family networks. This included 9 participants who self‐identified as sporadic, demonstrating the utility of direct genetic characterization to determine familiality in FTD. Most of the predicted families were associated with disease causing variants in the 3 major FTD‐causing genes: 66 families with known C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers, 35 with MAPT (including 11 families with the variant historically known as p.P301L) and 30 with GRN pathogenic variant carriers, as well as 2 families with carriers of both a C9orf72 expansion and a GRN pathogenic variant. We also identified 5 families with carriers of pathogenic variants in other familial dementia genes (2 TARDBP, 2 VCP and 1 PSEN1), as well as 12 families with yet unknown genetic etiology.ConclusionsThis dataset sets up a crucial resource to increase statistical accuracy and power in downstream association studies using the clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and biomarker data currently being generated by the ALLFTD consortium. It will also facilitate genetic studies aimed at novel gene discovery, and identification of haplotypes and genetic modifiers associated with the 3 major FTD causal genes.