Skali, Hicham

Background This study aims to characterize right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction and understand the cumulative prognostic value of abnormal RV echocardiographic parameters in HF with preserved ejection fraction. Methods and Results Data from 809 patients in the PARAGON‐HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin‐Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in HF With Preserved Ejection Fraction) echocardiographic substudy (55% women, mean age 74±8 years) were analyzed. Correlates of RVD (defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <1.7 cm, fractional area change <35% or absolute RV free wall longitudinal strain <20%) were identified using multivariable logistic regression models. We further assessed the prognostic value of the number of abnormal RV parameters (0, 1, ≥2) on total HF hospitalizations (HFH) and cardiovascular death, total HFH, first HFH or cardiovascular death, all‐cause death, and cardiovascular death. RVD was identified in 461 (57%) patients. Correlates of RVD included older age, higher heart rate, atrial fibrillation/flutter, greater left ventricle wall thickness, higher N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide levels, lower systolic blood pressure, and lower left ventricle absolute global longitudinal strain. These results were consistent across sexes, except atrial fibrillation/flutter and LV wall thickness, which were associated with a higher risk of RVD in men but not in women. Participants with ≥2 abnormal RV parameters had a significantly higher adjusted risk of total HFH and cardiovascular death (rate ratio, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.13–4.01]), first HFH or cardiovascular death, all‐cause death, and cardiovascular death. Conversely, an isolated abnormal RV parameter was not associated with a worse outcome. Conclusions RV measures may underestimate the burden of RVD in HF with preserved ejection fraction when considered in isolation. Clinicians should consider multiple dimensions to comprehensively assess RV function in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.

Abstract Aims To evaluate clinical outcomes, echocardiographic features, and the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan across age groups in the PARAGON-HF trial. Methods and results A total of 4796 participants ≥50 years of age with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥45% were divided into three age groups: &lt;65 years (n = 825), 65–74 years (n = 1772), and ≥75 years (n = 2199). Echocardiograms of 1097 patients were analysed in a standardized fashion at a core imaging laboratory. The primary composite outcome was total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular (CV) death. Older patients were more likely to experience primary composite outcomes (compared to patients &lt;65 years, adjusted rate ratio [aRR] for ≥75 years: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–1.61), total HF hospitalization (aRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09–1.49), and CV death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.44–2.87). Age did not modify the effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan on primary composite endpoint (pinteraction = 0.79) in the overall population or in those with LVEF ≤57%. Older adults randomized to sacubitril/valsartan were more likely to develop hypotension compared to those receiving valsartan (pinteraction = 0.026). Older patients had smaller left ventricular chamber sizes, higher LVEF, and were more likely to have abnormal measures of diastolic function. Conclusion Older patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction had higher event rates than younger patients, more adverse events overall, and more hypotension when treated with sacubitril/valsartan; however, the treatment benefits of sacubitril/valsartan were retained in older patients.

Introduction: Impaired tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC) and right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) have been individually associated with a worse prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, these parameters measure different aspects of RV function and understanding their cumulative effect may provide insights into the overall impact of RV dysfunction (RVD) in HFpEF patients. Goal: Assess the association between the number of echocardiographic RVD parameters and clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients from the echocardiographic sub-study of the PARAGON-HF trial with adequate image quality (N=809, 53% women, mean age 74±8 years) were categorized based on the number of measures of RVD, which included TAPSE <1.7 cm, FAC <35% or RVFWLS <20% (absolute value). Associations with total HF hospitalizations (HFH) and CV death, total HFH alone, first HFH or CV death, all-cause death and CV death were assessed by Groups, after accounting for confounders. Results: A total of 348 patients (43%) in Group 0 (no abnormal parameter), 355 (44%) in Group 1 (one abnormal parameter) and 106 (13%) in Group 2 (two or more abnormal parameters) were identified. After multivariable adjustment ( Table ), Group 2 was significantly associated with an increased risk of total HFH and CV death (RR 2.13, 95%CI 1.13-4.01), first HFH or CV death (RR 2.07, 95%CI 1.15-3.73), all-cause death (RR 2.61, 95%CI 1.19-5.74) and CV death (RR 3.08, 95%CI 1.14-8.31). The treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan for total HFH and CV death was not modified by RVD Group (p-value for interaction=0.94). Conclusions: The presence of two or more RVD parameters was associated with a significantly worse prognosis, while an isolated RVD measure was not. These findings suggest that a more comprehensive approach to assessment of RV function may have better prognostic value in HFpEF.

Introduction: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is a major prognostic factor in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), however determinants of RVD in HFpEF are not well described. Although sex-specific mechanisms have been incriminated in the development of HFpEF, it is unclear whether this is also true for RVD. Goals: (1) Assess the prevalence of RVD (defined as a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE] <1.7 cm, a fractional area change [FAC] <35% or a RV free wall longitudinal strain [RVFWLS] <20%, absolute value) in patients with HFpEF; (2) identify determinants of RVD, overall and according to sex, in patients with HFpEF. Methods: We used data from patients enrolled in the echocardiographic sub-study of the PARAGON-HF trial with adequate image quality (N=809, 53% women, mean age 74±8 years). Determinants of RVD, in the whole study population and according to sex, were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: There were 461 patients (57%) with RVD. After multivariable adjustment, RVD was cross-sectionally associated with a history of atrial fibrillation of flutter (AFF), older age, higher heart rate, greater LV mean wall thickness and higher NT-proBNP values. Systolic blood pressure and LV global longitudinal strain (absolute value) showed an inverse association ( Figure ). These results were consistent between men and women, except for AFF and LV mean wall thickness, which were associated with a greater likelihood of RVD in men (OR 2.46, 95%CI 1.33-4.56, OR 1.61, 95%CI 1.18-2.21 respectively) but not in women (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.58-1.68, OR 0.90 95%CI 0.69-1.17 respectively, p-values for interaction=0.028 and 0.006). Conclusions: RVD was highly prevalent in our study population. Determinants of RVD included AFF, LV remodeling and systolic impairment, and increased NT-proBNP levels. Differences between men and women suggest gender-specific mechanisms in the development of RVD in HFpEF.

Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) may have different characteristics by age groups. Aim Compare clinical and echocardiographic characteristics in patients with HFpEF enrolled in the PARAGON-HF echocardiography substudy by age groups. Methods: Echocardiography was performed in 1097 patients in PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction), where patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >=45% were enrolled. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were compared in patients who were <65, 65-74, and >75 years of age. Results: Younger patients were more likely to be male, obese, have prior myocardial infarction (MI) and diabetes, but less likely to have atrial fibrillation (AF, Table 1). Older patients had smaller left ventricular (LV) dimension indices, more likely to have concentric hypertrophy or remodeling, higher LVEF and better global longitudinal strain, and more likely to have left atrial enlargement and echocardiographic evidence of higher LV filling pressure (Table 1). Echocardiographic measures of pulmonary pressure and right ventricular function were similar across age groups. After adjusting for sex, race, region, history of MI, diabetes, AF, and body mass index, every 10 years of increase in age was associated with 5.1 mL/m 2 decrease in LV end-diastolic volume index (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9 - 6.5, p < 0.001), 0.4% increase in absolute global longitudinal strain (95% CI 0.1% - 0.7%, p = 0.017), and 1.07 increase in E/e’ septal ratio (95% CI 0.42 - 1.73, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Compared with younger patients, older patients with HFpEF were more likely to be female with AF, have better systolic function and higher LV filling pressure. These findings demonstrated the heterogeneity in cardiac structure and function in HFpEF by age and may have implications for treatment and future clinical trial recruitment.