Temkit, Hamy

Objective To assess the quality of nasopharyngoscopy video recordings used for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) surgical planning and identify factors that limit evaluation of velopharyngeal closure. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Metropolitan-based hospitals with craniofacial clinics in the United States and Canada. Participants One-hundred and forty-two (142) patients with VPI across 10 hospitals. Assessment(s) Nasopharyngoscopy video recordings used for VPI surgical planning . Main Outcome Measure(s) Ratability of nasopharyngoscopy video recordings, with “ratable” defined as the video (1) visualized the velum, lateral pharyngeal wall, and posterior pharyngeal walls at some point during speech production and (2) contained an oral speech sample at the phrase level or above. Results One-hundred and forty-two (142) nasopharyngoscopy video recordings were obtained from patients undergoing VPI evaluation, of which 59.9% (n=85) were ratable. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to identify factors that influenced the quality of nasopharyngoscopy video recordings. Factors associated with unratable nasopharyngoscopy videos were age ( P =.030), sex ( P =.005*), type of scope camera used ( P =.039), presence of compensatory misarticulations ( P =.008), and a limited speech sample ( P =.040). Conclusions A substantial proportion of nasopharyngoscopy video recordings obtained during VPI evaluation are not sufficient for rating velopharyngeal closure. Lack of ratability could impact the surgery selected to treat VPI. Younger patients, those with limited speech samples, or patients with extensive compensatory articulations may be more successful in completing other VPI imaging techniques, such as videofluoroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between perceptual ratings of hypernasality made during connected speech and velopharyngeal (VP) gap size measured in millimeters in the sagittal plane during sustained vowel production using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Method: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was completed. A subgroup of 110 participants from another study with an M age of 10.1 years presenting for management of VP insufficiency was included. Perceptual ratings of hypernasality during connected speech and measurement of gap size during sustained /i/ production on MRI were performed by raters blinded to the participants' medical and surgical history. Results: There was a moderate-to-strong, positive correlation ( r = .61; p < .001) between hypernasality ratings and VP gap size measured on MRI using sustained /i/. The odds of a higher hypernasality rating increased as the gap size increased (odds ratio = 1.34; 95% CI [1.20, 1.49]; p < .001). The predicted probability for hypernasality ratings of none/minimal/mild steadily decreased as the gap size increased indicating that lower ratings of hypernasality were associated with smaller gap sizes. For the rating of “moderate” hypernasality, the predicted probability of the rating steadily increased up to 8 mm and then decreased as the gap size continued to increase. The predicted probability for a hypernasality rating of “severe” consistently increased as the gap size increased. Conclusions: Hypernasality ratings made at the connected speech level were significantly associated with VP gap size as measured during sustained vowel production. These findings suggest sustained vowel production elicited on MRI may adequately characterize VP gap size in the evaluation of VP insufficiency.