Bunton, Kate

Objective To explore if observations on nasopharyngoscopy influence the surgical procedure selected for the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). Design Cross-sectional survey. Participants Seventeen surgeons with experience treating VPI. Interventions Review of twenty-four nasopharyngoscopy videos with a combination of velopharyngeal closure patterns and gap sizes. Main Outcome Measures Surgical procedure was selected after watching a nasopharyngoscopy video. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate if, for each surgeon, procedure selection varied based on closure pattern and gap size combination. Variable importance scores were obtained from a random forest analysis to quantify contribution of nasopharyngoscopy observations on procedure selection. Results Four procedures accounted for 86% of all surgeries selected: Furlow double-opposing Z-Plasty (33%), palatal lengthening using buccal myomucosal flaps (20%), pharyngeal flap (19%), and sphincter pharyngoplasty (14%). Four surgeons (23.5%) significantly varied their surgical selection when different closure pattern and gap size combinations were shown on nasopharyngoscopy. Ten surgeons (58%) selected the same procedure in ≥ 50% of the 24 nasopharyngoscopy videos. Individual surgeon preference was the strongest predictor of surgical selection, accounting for 57.9% of surgical selection variance. Velopharyngeal gap size accounted for 36.5% of the variance in surgical selection, yet the specific surgeries selected based on gap size varied widely across surgeons. Closure pattern was a weak predictor, contributing 5.6% to surgical selection variance. Conclusions Nasopharyngoscopy findings influence VPI surgical procedure selection in a highly individualized, surgeon-specific manner. Among factors observed on nasopharyngoscopy, velopharyngeal gap size has a much larger influence on procedure selection than closure pattern.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether successful surgical management of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) aids in the remediation of compensatory misarticulation errors (CMAs) among children with VPI and CMAs. Method: Fourteen participants with VPI and use of CMAs from a larger study were included in this retrospective cohort study. The mean age at the time of preoperative evaluation was 8.9 years ( SD = 1.1). Perceptual ratings of hypernasality, phonetic transcription, and anatomic measurements from magnetic resonance imaging were performed by raters blinded to the participants' medical and surgical history. The mean percentage of CMAs produced on the American English Sentence Sample was calculated. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used to compare the change in CMA use pre- and postoperatively. During the study period, 71% ( n = 10) of participants received speech therapy. Results: Nine participants had resolved hypernasality after surgery, and five had persistent hypernasality. Among those with resolved hypernasality, the mean percentage of CMAs significantly decreased from 14.6% preoperatively to 1.1% postoperatively ( p = .028). For participants with persistent hypernasality, the mean percentage of CMAs decreased from 27.6% to 22%; this change was not significant ( p = .586). Conclusions: Correction of VPI may aid in the remediation of CMAs as participants have more normal anatomy to achieve velopharyngeal closure. These findings suggest correction of VPI may reduce the amount of speech therapy needed to treat CMAs.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between perceptual ratings of hypernasality made during connected speech and velopharyngeal (VP) gap size measured in millimeters in the sagittal plane during sustained vowel production using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Method: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was completed. A subgroup of 110 participants from another study with an M age of 10.1 years presenting for management of VP insufficiency was included. Perceptual ratings of hypernasality during connected speech and measurement of gap size during sustained /i/ production on MRI were performed by raters blinded to the participants' medical and surgical history. Results: There was a moderate-to-strong, positive correlation ( r = .61; p < .001) between hypernasality ratings and VP gap size measured on MRI using sustained /i/. The odds of a higher hypernasality rating increased as the gap size increased (odds ratio = 1.34; 95% CI [1.20, 1.49]; p < .001). The predicted probability for hypernasality ratings of none/minimal/mild steadily decreased as the gap size increased indicating that lower ratings of hypernasality were associated with smaller gap sizes. For the rating of “moderate” hypernasality, the predicted probability of the rating steadily increased up to 8 mm and then decreased as the gap size continued to increase. The predicted probability for a hypernasality rating of “severe” consistently increased as the gap size increased. Conclusions: Hypernasality ratings made at the connected speech level were significantly associated with VP gap size as measured during sustained vowel production. These findings suggest sustained vowel production elicited on MRI may adequately characterize VP gap size in the evaluation of VP insufficiency.

Purpose Darley, Aronson, and Brown (1969a, 1969b) detailed methods and results of auditory-perceptual assessment for speakers with dysarthrias of varying etiology. They reported adequate listener reliability for use of the rating system as a tool for differential diagnosis, but several more recent studies have raised concerns about listener reliability using this approach. Method In the present study, the authors examined intrarater and interrater agreement for perceptual ratings of 47 speakers with various dysarthria types by 2 listener groups (inexperienced and experienced). The entire set of perceptual features proposed by Darley et al. was rated based on a 40-s conversational speech sample. Results No differences in levels of agreement were found between the listener groups. Agreement was within 1 scale value or better for 67% of the pairwise comparisons. Levels of agreement were lower when the average rating fell in the mid-range of the scale compared with samples that had an average rating near either of the scale endpoints; agreement was above chance level. No significant differences in agreement were found between the perceptual features. Discussion The levels of listener agreement that were found indicate that auditory-perceptual ratings show promise during clinical assessment for identifying salient features of dysarthria for speakers with various etiologies.