Wozniak, Katie

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma is the second most common adult blood cancer and remains incurable, despite recent advances. The IMWG/IMS recently published updated risk criteria, Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS), combining genomic events with clinical measures to identify high-risk patients (Avet-Loiseau, et al. JCO 2025). We applied CGS risk criteria to baseline samples from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation CoMMpass Study (NCT01454297), a prospective, longitudinal observational study that enrolled more than1100 participants between 2011-2017. Methods: We assessed patient risk following CGS criteria. Criteria 1: del(17p), with a cutoff of >20% clonal fraction, and/or TP53 mutation. Criteria 2: an IgH translocation including t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) along with 1q+ and/or del(1p32). Criteria 3: monoallelic del(1p32) along with 1q+ or biallelic del(1p32). Criteria 4: beta-2 microglobulin >= 5.5 mg/L with normal creatinine. Patients meeting one or more criteria were classified as High Risk. To test if risk showed association with genetic ancestry, we grouped patients into those with high African genetic ancestry and those with low African genetic ancestry. Genetic ancestry was measured using ADMIXTURE in comparison to 1000 Genomes. Results: We evaluated the CGS risk status of 877 CoMMpass patients, finding 69.2% (573/828) to be Standard Risk (SR) and 30.8% (255/828) to be High Risk (HR). HR patients showed worse progression-free survival (median PFS 26.3 months vs. 42.5 months; log rank test, p < 0.0001) and overall survival (median OS 63.9 months vs. median not reached; p < 0.0001). 10.6% (91/858) of patients met Criteria 1, 10.7% (93/873) met Criteria 2, 5.6% (49/877) met Criteria 3, and 8.7% (73/835) met Criteria 4. We found 14.2% (123/867) of patients to have high African-like genetic ancestry (AFR-high) and 85.8% (744/867) to have low African-like genetic ancestry (AFR-low). We observed significantly fewer HR patients within the AFR-high group (20%, 23/115) than in the AFR-low group (32.4%, 231/712) (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.0065). The AFR-high group met HR criteria at a lower rate across all criteria, but only with Criteria 3 was the difference significant (p-value = 0.03). Higher levels of creatinine in AFR-high patients may have impacted meeting the normal creatinine requirement of Criteria 4. Conclusions: HR patients comprise 30.8% of CoMMpass subjects and show significantly worse PFS and OS than SR patients. AFR-high patients met HR criteria at a lower rate than AFR-low patients according to the CGS criteria. Clinical trials that utilize CGS criteria to determine patient eligibility may be challenged to enroll a representative patient population, including AFR-high patients. Screening and eligibility criteria should be carefully considered to mitigate potential enrollment disparities. Citation Format: Steven M. Foltz, Chaitanya R. Acharya, Alexander Gout, Yuxin Jin, David E. Avigan, Ravi Vij, Shaji Kunnathu Kumar, Sagar Lonial, Hearn Cho, Katie Wozniak, Jonathan J. Keats, Craig Cole, John D. Carpten, George J. Mulligan. Multiple myeloma risk classification of CoMMpass using Consensus Genomic Staging identifies differences between patients with high and low African genetic ancestry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3887.

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by somatic mutations involving cancer-associated genes. The MyDRUG trial was initiated to explore the efficacy of specific molecularly-targeted therapies in combination with a standard triplet combination in MM. Methods: MyDRUG (NCT03732703) is a genomically-guided umbrella trial for patients with functional high-risk MM, defined as early relapse following primary therapy (3 years for transplant with maintenance, 18 months without), with specific genetic abnormalities. Patients with no actionable mutation or mutations with allelic burden below 30% were randomly assigned to one of the “non-actionable” arms. Here we present the data for the Y3 arm which combines selinexor (60mg po days 1,8,15), ixazomib (4mg po days 1,8,15), pomalidomide (3mg po days 1-21) and dexamethasone (40mg po weekly) (Seli-IPD), given on a 28-day cycle. The primary objective of the Y3 sub-protocol was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) according to the International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria. Secondary objectives included assessment of adverse events (AEs). Results: 17 patients were enrolled into the Y3 arm. The average age was 62 (51-79), 65% were male with a median of 29 months since initial diagnosis and a median of 2 prior lines of therapy. The ORR (> PR) was 52.9% with a clinical benefit rate (> MR) of 58.8%. The median progression free survival was 10.2 months ( 95% CI: 3.9; 12.9) with a median overall survival which has not yet been reached; with all 17 patients still alive at the current data cutoff. No dose-limiting toxicities were seen. Eight patients (47.1%) experienced a serious AE with 2 patients (11.8%) experiencing an AE leading to treatment discontinuation. Two patients (11.8%) required dose reductions. The most common non-hematologic AEs were fatigue, nausea and constipation; all of which were grade 1 and 2. Conclusions: In this platform study of patients with relapsed, functionally high-risk MM, patients who received Seli-IPd exhibited significant efficacy and a manageable AE profile. Furthermore, this provides an all-oral option for patients wishing to minimize their office visits and parenteral therapy administrations.