Mallery, David

Aberrant activation of the Hippo–YAP/TAZ–TEAD transcriptional axis is a recurrent feature of multiple solid tumors and contributes to tumor maintenance, lineage plasticity, and therapeutic resistance. Recent medicinal chemistry has shown that TEAD proteins are druggable, but the rate at which in silico screening nominates compounds that prove functionally active in cells remains poorly defined, and negative validation results are rarely reported. Here we describe an experimental assessment of a focused set of computationally nominated candidate compounds, selected from a structure-guided virtual screen of the YAP–TEAD interface across approximately 917,000 library compounds and three predicted binding sites. Candidates were evaluated using long-term (144 hour) CellTiter-Glo proliferation assays in three Hippo-altered malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines (MSTO-211H, NCI-H2052, NCI-H226), with the validated TEAD inhibitor K-975 and cisplatin as positive controls, and an exploratory TEAD-responsive luciferase reporter in MCF7 cells. K-975 produced dose-dependent antiproliferative activity in MSTO-211H and NCI-H2052, with reduced sensitivity in NCI-H226, while cisplatin reduced viability in all lines. In contrast, the computationally nominated compounds, including AG-690/36549045, AN-655/40856217, and additional library members, did not produce measurable antiproliferative activity at the concentrations tested. In the exploratory reporter, apparent suppression of TEAD activity consistently co-occurred with loss of cell viability, a pattern consistent with cytotoxicity rather than selective transcriptional inhibition; no TEAD-active reference compound was co-tested within the reporter panel, and no direct YAP–TEAD biochemical or target-engagement assay was performed. These results describe a case in which computational nomination at the YAP–TEAD interface showed limited concordance with cell-based activity and provide a transparent account of negative findings to inform expectations for early-stage discovery targeting Hippo-dependent transcriptional programs.

Background/Objectives: KRAS G12C mutations define a clinically actionable subset of solid tumors, particularly non–small cell lung cancer. Clinical responses to approved covalent inhibitors remain limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance, highlighting the need for structurally distinct inhibitor scaffolds to expand therapeutic options. The objective of this study was to identify novel covalent binders targeting the KRAS G12C switch-II pocket through large-scale in silico screening and experimental validation. Methods: More than 1.9 million small molecules from diverse commercial libraries were screened using covalent docking, followed by multi-stage refinement incorporating molecular dynamics simulations, MM/GBSA free-energy estimation, and cancer-focused QSAR modeling. Results: This integrated workflow yielded 50 prioritized compounds spanning several chemically distinct scaffold classes. These candidates displayed favorable predicted binding energetics, stable ligand-protein interactions over extended simulation timescales, and low structural similarity to clinically approved KRAS G12C inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib. Benchmarking against these clinical agents, using identical computational parameters, yielded comparable predicted binding energies for several candidate molecules. In cellular NanoBRET target-engagement assays, selected scaffolds, including K788-7251 and AN-989/14669131, exhibited sub-micromolar engagement of KRAS G12C with minimal endothelial cytotoxicity. Conclusions: Collectively, these findings identify structurally distinct, KRAS G12C inhibitor chemotypes and provide tractable starting points for the development of next-generation targeted therapies.

Purpose To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) using a treatment regimen selected by molecular profiling (MP) of a patient's tumor with the PFS for the most recent regimen on which the patient had experienced progression (ie, patient as his own control). Patients and Methods Patients with refractory metastatic cancer had tissue samples submitted for MP in two formats including formalin-fixed tissue for immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization assays and immediately frozen tissue for oligonucleotide microarray (MA) gene expression assays (all performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [ CLIA ] –certified laboratory). The MP approach was deemed of clinical benefit for the individual patient who had a PFS ratio (PFS on MP-selected therapy/PFS on prior therapy) of ≥ 1.3. Results In 86 patients who had MP attempted, there was a molecular target detected in 84 (98%). Sixty-six of the 84 patients were treated according to MP results. Eighteen (27%) of 66 patients had a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3 (95% CI, 17% to 38%; one-sided, one-sample P = .007). Therefore, the null hypothesis (that ≤ 15% of this patient population would have a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3) was rejected. Conclusion It is possible to identify molecular targets in patients' tumors from nine different centers across the United States. In 27% of patients, the MP approach resulted in a longer PFS on an MP-suggested regimen than on the regimen on which the patient had just experienced progression. Issues to be considered in interpretation of this study include limited prior experience with patients as their own controls as a study end point and overall patient attrition.