Rosen, Peter J.

Abstract Abstract 4723 Introduction: Combination G/A has been shown to be apromising investigational therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. A randomized phase II trial was initiated to determine if ODSH, a low anticoagulant heparin derivative that blocks several pancreatic cancer cell survival pathways, would enhance the efficacy of G/A. Preliminary data from the first 10 patients administered ODSH demonstrated an unexpected and profound preservation of peripheral blood counts, despite the highly myelosuppressive G/A regimen they also received. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with G (1000 mg/m2) and A (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days until either disease progression or unacceptable toxicities ensued. ODSH (4 mg/kg bolus followed by a 48 hr. continuous IV infusion at a dose of 0.375 mg/kg/hr for 48 hrs) was administered with each treatment. The first 10 patients received A/G plusODSH with plans for a randomized comparison between A/G with and without ODSH involving 50 patients. Patients were required to have ECOG 0–1 as well as adequate hematological and bilirubin level <1.5 ULN. G-CSF administration was permitted per investigator discretion. Here we present hematological data on the 10 patients treated with A/G plus ODSH. Results: 10 patients were administered up to 5 cycles of G/A plus ODSH. The patients had a median age of 66 years (range, 59 to 75 years) and 50% were male. The median platelet and neutrophil counts prior to each cycle are listed in Table 1. No patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia during any of the cycles. Forty percent of patients had grade 3 neutropenia, but none had grade 4 during any of the cycles. Only 1 patient received 1 dose of G-CSF after day 15 in cycle #1. Conclusions: A previous trial of G/A in patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer reported grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in 28% (19% grade 3 and 9% grade 4) and 75% (26% grade 3 and 49% grade 4) of patients, respectively (Von Hoff, J Clin Oncol, 2011). With the addition of ODSH to an equivalent chemotherapy regimen in a similar patient cohort, the current trial reported grade 3 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in 0% and 40% of patients, respectively, with no patients having grade 4 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. With successive cycles, median platelet counts were stable to improved and a trend existed for reduced neutropenia with ODSH treatment. An explanation for the apparent salutary effects of ODSH on marrow function may involve its interaction with platelet factor 4 (PF4). PF4 is released from the alpha-granules of injured megakaryocytes after chemotherapy delivery. Increased PF4 levels promote thrombocytopenia by inhibiting thrombopoietin production and megakaryopoiesis (Lambert, Blood, 2007; Lambert, Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys, 2011). The high molecular weight and strong negative charge of ODSH may result in avid binding to platelet factor 4 (PF4), possibly leading to decreased PF4 levels and more rapid post-chemotherapy platelet recovery (Joglekar, Thromb Haemost, 2012). PF4 may also facilitate neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells, and reduced PF4 levels from ODSH binding may demarginate and preserve neutrophil values (Kasper, Blood, 2006). Further study of ODSH as a marrow protective agent in myelosuppressivechemotherapy regimens is warranted. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The use of nab-paclitaxel and ODSH in pancreatic cancer. Marcus:Paringenix: Employment, Equity Ownership. Quintana Diez:Paringenix, Inc.: Employment.

284 Background: ODSH, a low anticoagulant heparin derivative, interferes with several important pancreatic cancer cell survival pathways. A randomized phase II trial was initiated to determine if ODSH improves the activity of G/A, a promising pancreatic cancer investigational therapy. Preliminary data are presented here for the first 10 patients administered ODSH as part of an initial run-in phase prior to patient randomization. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with G (1,000 mg/m2) and A (125 mg/m2) plus ODSH (4 mg/kg bolus followed by a 48 hr. continuous IV infusion at a dose of 0.375 mg/kg/hr) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were required to have ECOG ≤ 1 and appropriate blood and liver function levels. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 10 patients (median age, 66 years) were administered up to 5 cycles of G/A plus ODSH. Per RECIST criteria, a partial response (PR) was achieved in 5 patients (50%) and the median PFS will exceed 6 months. Disease control (PR or stable disease for > 16 weeks) occurred in all 10 patients. Of 9 patients with baseline elevated CA 19-9 levels, 8 had > 60% reduction. ODSH was well tolerated and unexpectedly appeared to preserve marrow function as no patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia or grade 4 neutropenia during any of the cycles. Conclusions: Although G/A and FOLFIRINOX are important advances, additional progress is necessary for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. ODSH may interfere with pancreatic cancer invasion, metastasis, and chemo-resistance by inhibiting P- and L-selectins, heparanase, and the HMGB1-RAGE axis, respectively, suggesting that ODSH may enhance chemotherapy activity. This preliminary analysis in a small number of patients is encouraging and consistent with a previous report for this regimen (Von Hoff, J Clin Oncol, 2011). ODSH has also been very well tolerated and early data suggests that it may preserve platelet and neutrophil levels. Further follow-up of the ongoing randomized phase II trial is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01461915.

Purpose TH-302 is an investigational hypoxia-activated prodrug that releases the DNA alkylator bromo-isophosphoramide mustard in hypoxic settings. This phase II study (NCT01144455) evaluated gemcitabine plus TH-302 in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2), gemcitabine plus TH-302 240 mg/m2 (G+T240), or gemcitabine plus TH-302 340 mg/m2 (G+T340). Randomized crossover after progression on gemcitabine was allowed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), tumor response, CA 19-9 response, and safety. Results Two hundred fourteen patients (77% with metastatic disease) were enrolled between June 2010 and July 2011. PFS was significantly longer with gemcitabine plus TH-302 (pooled combination arms) compared with gemcitabine alone (median PFS, 5.6 v 3.6 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87; P = .005; median PFS for metastatic disease, 5.1 v 3.4 months, respectively). Median PFS times for G+T240 and G+T340 were 5.6 and 6.0 months, respectively. Tumor response was 12%, 17%, and 26% in the gemcitabine, G+T240, and G+T340 arms, respectively (G+T340 v gemcitabine, P = .04). CA 19-9 decrease was greater with G+T340 versus gemcitabine (−5,398 v −549 U/mL, respectively; P = .008). Median OS times for gemcitabine, G+T240, and G+T340 were 6.9, 8.7, and 9.2 months, respectively (P = not significant). The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, nausea, and peripheral edema (frequencies similar across arms). Skin and mucosal toxicities (2% grade 3) and myelosuppression (55% grade 3 or 4) were the most common TH-302–related AEs but were not associated with treatment discontinuation. Conclusion PFS, tumor response, and CA 19-9 response were significantly improved with G+TH-302. G+T340 is being investigated further in the phase III MAESTRO study (NCT01746979).

Abstract A hypoxic microenvironment is believed to be a characteristic of solid tumors including pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) and is associated with resistance to chemotherapy. The hypoxia-activated prodrug, TH-302, is designed to specifically target the hypoxic microenvironment. Combining G with TH-302 may enable the targeting of both the normoxic and hypoxic regions of PAC. TH-302 was investigated with full-dose G as part of a Phase 1/2 study with a 21% response, median PFS and OS of 5.9 and 8.5 months, respectively, and one-year survival of &gt;40%. Based upon these data, a randomized Phase 2B study (NCT01144455) was conducted to assess the benefit of G+T to standard dose G for first-line therapy of PAC. An open-label multi-center study of two dose levels of TH-302 (240 mg/m2 or 340 mg/m2) in combination with G versus G alone (randomized 1:1:1) was initiated in June 2010. G (1000 mg/m2) and T were administered IV over 30-60 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients on the G arm could crossover after progression and be randomized to a G+T arm. The primary efficacy endpoint is a comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between the combination arms and G alone (80% power to detect 50% improvement in PFS with one-sided alpha of 10%). 214 pts (69 G: 71 G+T240: 74 G+T340) with advanced PAC including 77% distant metastases, 62% involving liver and 11% with prior adjuvant tx; median age: 65 (range 29-86); 126 M/88 F; 79/128 ECOG 0/1. Median cycles received: G - 4, G+T240 - 5, G+T340 - 6. Median PFS was 3.6 mo in G vs 5.6 mo in G+T arms with HR of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.43 - 0.87) and logrank p-value of 0.005. Median PFS in G + T340 was 6.0 mo. RECIST best response was 12% in G, 17% in G+T 240 and 27% in G+T340. 153 (71%) patients had elevated CA19-9 and follow-up. CA19-9 decreases were significantly greater in the G+T groups and greatest in the G+T340 arm which had 37 of 53 (70%) pts with a greater than 50% CA19-9 decrease. One death (suicide) was considered possibly related to study drug. Adverse events leading to discontinuation were: 16% G, 15% G+T240 and 11% G+T340. Serious adverse events were balanced across the treatment arms. The most common non-laboratory events, fatigue (49%), nausea (43%), constipation (34%) and peripheral edema (38%), were similar across groups. Rash (14% G, 39% G+T240 and 45% G+T340) and stomatitis (6% G, 17% G+T240 and 36% G+T340) were significantly greater with G+T combination but no Grd 4 (4 pts with Grade 3). Grd 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11% G, 39% G+T240 and 59% G+T340) and Grd 3/4 neutropenia (28% G, 56% G+T240 and 59% G+T340) were higher with G+T. G+T combination with full dose G improved the efficacy of G with significantly longer PFS, higher response rate and greater CA19-9 declines. The G+T combination was well tolerated. Skin and mucosal toxicity and myelosuppression were the most common related adverse events with no increase in treatment discontinuation. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-121. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-LB-121

Abstract Carfilzomib is a selective proteasome inhibitor that binds irreversibly to its target. In phase 1 studies, carfilzomib elicited promising responses and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). In the present phase 2, multicenter, open-label study, 129 bortezomib-naive patients with R/R MM (median of 2 prior therapies) were separated into Cohort 1, scheduled to receive intravenous carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 for all treatment cycles, and Cohort 2, scheduled to receive 20 mg/m2 for cycle 1 and then 27 mg/m2 for all subsequent cycles. The primary end point was an overall response rate (≥ partial response) of 42.4% in Cohort 1 and 52.2% in Cohort 2. The clinical benefit response (overall response rate + minimal response) was 59.3% and 64.2% in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Median duration of response was 13.1 months and not reached, and median time to progression was 8.3 months and not reached, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (62.0%) and nausea (48.8%). Single-agent carfilzomib elicited a low incidence of peripheral neuropathy—17.1% overall (1 grade 3; no grade 4)—in these pretreated bortezomib-naive patients. The results of the present study support the use of carfilzomib in R/R MM patients. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00530816.

Purpose To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) using a treatment regimen selected by molecular profiling (MP) of a patient's tumor with the PFS for the most recent regimen on which the patient had experienced progression (ie, patient as his own control). Patients and Methods Patients with refractory metastatic cancer had tissue samples submitted for MP in two formats including formalin-fixed tissue for immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization assays and immediately frozen tissue for oligonucleotide microarray (MA) gene expression assays (all performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [ CLIA ] –certified laboratory). The MP approach was deemed of clinical benefit for the individual patient who had a PFS ratio (PFS on MP-selected therapy/PFS on prior therapy) of ≥ 1.3. Results In 86 patients who had MP attempted, there was a molecular target detected in 84 (98%). Sixty-six of the 84 patients were treated according to MP results. Eighteen (27%) of 66 patients had a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3 (95% CI, 17% to 38%; one-sided, one-sample P = .007). Therefore, the null hypothesis (that ≤ 15% of this patient population would have a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3) was rejected. Conclusion It is possible to identify molecular targets in patients' tumors from nine different centers across the United States. In 27% of patients, the MP approach resulted in a longer PFS on an MP-suggested regimen than on the regimen on which the patient had just experienced progression. Issues to be considered in interpretation of this study include limited prior experience with patients as their own controls as a study end point and overall patient attrition.