Aduen, Paula

Abstract Background Disparities in structural and social determinants of health in Latino and Black communities may increase the burden of Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). Identifying dementia risk factors, which may account for up to 45% of ADRD risk, is crucial to implement effective risk‐reduction strategies. This study aimed to assess ADRD risk factors in community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black Americans by measuring the frequency of modifiable dementia risk factors through subjective and objective measures. Method Community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black adults (≥45‐years‐old) were enrolled in a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Baseline assessments conducted between Mach 2022 and November 2024 included demographics, self‐reported race/ethnicity, and history of dementia risk factors. Socioeconomic deprivation [Area Deprivation Index (ADI) State scores] and modifiable dementia risk factors were reported by participants and directly measured, including hypertension (BP >130/80 mmHg), obesity (BMI≥30), hyperlipidemia (LDL>100 mg/dL), hyperglycemia (HbA1C >5.6%), low vitamin B12 (B12<350 pg/mL), hearing loss (bedside assessment), vision loss (bedside assessment), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale ≥5). Result 105 participants (47 Latino, 55 Black), 64.7 (±8.8) years‐old, female 66 (63%), with 16 (±2.3) years of education were assessed. Black participants experienced higher socioeconomic deprivation than Latino participants (median ADI 7 vs 3; p <0.001). Dementia risk factors were common in Latino and Black participants. These included, hypertension (55.3%, 70.3%; p = 0.291), hyperlipidemia (58.7%, 55.8%; p = 0.908), obesity (29.8%, 45.5%; p = 0.263), hyperglycemia (51.1%, 49.1%; p = 0.834), low vitamin B12 (23.9%, 28.0%; p = 0.270), hearing loss (19.1%, 7.3%; p = 0.111), vision loss (85.1%, 85.2%; p = 0.771), and depression (6.4%, 5.5%; p = 0.168). Objective measures revealed a higher frequency of risk factors compared with participant‐provided history, highlighting a substantial proportion of unrecognized or inadequately treated risk factors: hypertension (62.3%, 45.1%; p = 0.067), hyperlipidemia (57.6%, 47.5%; p = 0.004), hyperglycemia (49%, 20%; p = <0.001), vitamin B12 deficiency (27.8%, 9.3%; p = 0.170), and depression (6.9%, 11.9%; p = 0.009). Conclusion Modifiable dementia risk factors were detected in most cognitively normal Latino and Black adults engaged in a longitudinal study of memory and aging. Objective measures highlighted unrecognized and undertreated risk factors. Active surveillance programs are needed to detect and treat modifiable ADRD risk factors in underrepresented populations.

AbstractBackgroundMayo Test DRIVE (MTD): Test Development through Rapid Iteration, Validation and Expansion, is a web‐based multi‐device (smartphone, tablet, personal computer) platform optimized for remote self‐administered cognitive assessment that includes a computer‐adaptive word list memory test (Stricker Learning Span; SLS), a measure of processing speed/executive functioning (Symbols Test) and a score combining both the memory and processing speed/executive functioning measures (MTD Composite). We aimed to determine the reliability of MTD measures across follow‐up sessions.MethodIndividuals participating in this ancillary study who completed at least two and up to four complete MTD sessions were included, resulting in 1,293 participants (mean age = 70.6, SD = 11.6; mean education = 15.6, SD = 2.3; 48.6% male; 96.9% White; 99.1% non‐Hispanic; 97.1% cognitively unimpaired) from parent studies (see Table 1). MTD raw scores were winsorized at 1% and 99% to minimize the impact of outliers. Test‐retest reliability was assessed using single‐rating, absolute‐agreement, and two‐way mixed ICCs and results are described using descriptives from Koo et al. (2016). ICCs for in‐person‐administered traditional neuropsychological measures are also reported alongside MTD for a subset of participants newly enrolled into the MCSA (to ensure participants were test naïve to both MTD and in‐person tests).ResultReliability was good for the MTD Composite raw [total ICC = 0.78; see Table 2 for session‐to‐session ICCs and 95% CIs], and moderate‐to‐good for the primary outcome variables for each subtest [total ICC = 0.74 for both SLS and Symbols]. Weighting by accuracy negatively impacted reliability of Symbols and the Composite; without this weighting, MTD Composite and Symbols variables showed higher reliability (MTD Composite z total ICC = 0.80; Symbols response time total ICC = 0.84; see Table 2). Alternative methods of defining response time on Symbols showed nearly identical reliability values. SLS sum of trials (primary variable) had subtly higher reliability than separate measures of learning (1‐5 correct, max span) or delay. Reliability of remote MTD and in‐person‐administered measures and select comparisons are provided in Table 3.ConclusionMTD showed moderate to good reliability, similar to in‐person‐administered traditional neuropsychological tests. Future work will examine the effect of demographics, device type, and session interference on reliability.

AbstractBackgroundCharacterizing stress can inform our understanding of direct and indirect pathways impacting mental and physical health outcomes, including age‐related cognitive decline. Chronic stress has been strongly associated with increased risk for cognitive decline, and hair cortisol concentration (HCC) has emerged as a viable neuroendocrine biomarker for its quantification. Cognitive appraisal of stress (CAS) provides key insight into the cognitive framework for responding to a given stressor. We implemented a multi‐pronged approach to evaluate chronic stress and examined its relation to cognition in older adults.MethodParticipants were 22 cognitively normal individuals (x̄ MMSE = 29.33, 0.92; x̄ age: 67.3 ± 8.8 years old, 17.0 ± 2.9 years of education, 54.5% female, 92.6% Non‐Hispanic White). Participants completed the Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN) assessing lifetime stressor exposure and the Primary and Secondary Cognitive Appraisal Scale (PSCAS). HCC was used as a neuroendocrine biomarker of chronic stress. A brief cognitive battery assessing episodic memory and executive functions (Digit Span, HVLT‐R, Trail Making Test, Letter Fluency) and mood/anxiety measures were completed. To correct for skewness, log‐transformed HCC values were used for Pearson and partial correlation analyses controlling for age and education.ResultLifetime stressor exposure and CAS were not significantly related to cognitive performance (all ps > 0.05). There was a marginally significant association between HCC and executive functions (r = ‐0.41, p = 0.08). Total lifetime stressor count, chronicity, and severity were unrelated to symptoms of depression and anxiety (all ps > 0.05). Although lifetime stressor exposure and mood were not significantly related to HCC, higher HCC was associated with higher perceived control of stress (r = 0.45, p = 0.03).ConclusionHCC may be more sensitive to CAS rather than to objective stressor exposure. This highlights the potential of interventions targeted at improving coping in those with chronic stress. Results are preliminary, and the present study will explore impact of social and structural determinants of health on chronic stressor exposure, appraisal, and cognition.

AbstractBackgroundThe prevalence of dementia in populations that are underrepresented in research is projected to increase with population aging. Latino and Black individuals, the largest underrepresented populations in the US, experience a higher dementia burden than non‐Hispanic White individuals, which is not explained by ethnoracial biological factors. Disparities in structural and social determinants of health may contribute to the preponderance of medical conditions known to increase dementia risk, including potentially modifiable factors in Latino and Black communities. To assess the scope of this problem, we measured the frequency of common modifiable dementia risk factors in community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black adults.MethodCognitively normal community‐dwelling Latino and Black adults, ≥45‐years‐old, were enrolled within our longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Florida (Jacksonville, FL) and completed a baseline assessment between 3/2022 and 10/2023. Demographics, and self‐reported race/ethnicity and history of dementia risk factors were recorded. Dementia risk factors were objectively sampled through clinical interview (depression: Geriatric Depression Scale ≥5), examination (hypertension: BP >130/80 mmHg; obesity: BMI≥30), and serum analyses (hyperlipidemia: total cholesterol<200mg/dL, HDL>50mg/dL, LDL<100mg/dL, Triglycerides<150mg/dL; diabetes: HbA1C >5.6%, vitamin B12 deficiency: <350 ng/dL).Result86 participants (43 Latino, 43 Black), 65.8 (8.8) years‐old, female (62.8%), with 16 (2.4) years of education were assessed. Dementia risk factors were frequent in Latino and Black participants, including hypertension (63%, 90%; p = 0.005), hyperlipidemia (93%, 89%; p = 0.702), obesity (33%, 44%; p = 0.370), diabetes (60%, 47%; p = 0.370), vitamin B12 deficiency (21%, 21%; p = 0.989), and depression (5%, 24%; p = 0.781). These risk factors were unrecognized or suboptimally managed in a substantial proportion of Latino and Black participants: hypertension (56%, 73%; p = 0.170), hyperlipidemia (80%, 73%; p = 0.591), diabetes (57%, 47%; p = 0.502), vitamin B12 deficiency (21%, 21%; p = 0.789), and depression (5%, 3%; p>0.99).ConclusionPotentially modifiable dementia risk factors were detected in the majority of community‐dwelling Latino and Black cognitively normal older‐adults and were frequently unrecognized or suboptimally managed. Proactive screening for known dementia risk factors may provide opportunities for targeted interventions to improve brain health and decrease dementia disparities in underrepresented populations.

Abstract Objective The primary aim of this paper is to review evidence and clinical implications related to lifestyle activities associated with promoting brain and cognitive health. Our review targets four key lifestyle factors: physical activity and exercise, social engagement, cognitively stimulating activity, and consuming Mediterranean-style diets. Method We conducted a critical review of the lifestyle factor literature in the four domains listed earlier. We contextualize this literature review by translating findings, when possible, into evidence-based recommendations to consider when providing neuropsychological services. Results There is significant current evidence supporting the role of physical activity and exercise, social engagement, cognitively stimulating activity, and consuming Mediterranean-style diets on positive brain and cognitive health outcomes. While some null findings are present in all four areas reviewed, the weight of the evidence supports the notion that engaging in these activities may promote brain and cognitive functioning. Conclusions Clinical neuropsychologists can have confidence in recommending engagement in physical activity, social activity, and cognitively stimulating activity, and adhering to a Mediterranean-style diet to promote brain and cognitive health. We discuss limitations in existing lifestyle factor research and future directions to enhance the existing evidence base, including additional research with historically underrepresented groups and individuals with neurological conditions.