BONVIE-HILL, NATALIE

Abstract Background Radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) may develop months to years following radiation therapy for cancers near the heart such as lung or breast cancer. Several mouse models of RIHD exist to study the pathogenesis of disease, but to our knowledge no studies have examined whether sex differences exist in RIHD in mice. Methods Female and male BALB/cJ mice received one whole heart dose of 22 Gray (Gy) radiation via a C5 collimator vs. sham controls that received 0 Gy, anesthesia and were placed in the X-ray machine for the same length of time. Mechanisms of cardiotoxicity were examined at 24 h (innate cardiotoxicity), day 10 (acute cardiotoxicity) and day 35 (chronic cardiotoxicity) post irradiation. Results Females and males developed dsDNA breaks from radiation at day 10 but females had more damage than males ( p < 0.001). Vessel area and cardiac hypertrophy were increased by radiation at day 10 and 35 but were higher in males than females at day 35 ( p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). Bulk RNA sequencing of the heart at day 10 revealed that females and males developed similar gene pathway responses to radiation by upregulating cellular repair pathways and downregulated mitochondrial function. However, females upregulated the master regulator of mitochondrial function, Pgc1α ( p = 0.0001), suggesting improved mitochondrial repair in females. By day 35, males developed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy (iDCM) and fibrosis while females developed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) without inflammation or fibrosis. Conclusions We observed sex differences in nearly every cardiac parameter that we examined following radiation exposure. BALB/c males exposed to 22 Gy radiation developed HFrEF and iDCM by day 35 while females developed HFpEF. Further research is needed to better understand mechanisms driving sex differences in RIHD using translational animal models.

Abstract Background Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle most often caused by an immune response to viral infections. Sex differences in the immune response during myocarditis have been well described but upstream mechanisms in the heart that might influence sex differences in disease are not completely understood. Methods Male and female BALB/c wild type mice received an intraperitoneal injection of heart-passaged coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) or vehicle control. Bulk-tissue RNA-sequencing was conducted to better understand sex differences in CVB3 myocarditis. We performed enrichment analysis to understand sex differences in the transcriptional landscape of myocarditis and identify candidate transcription factors that might drive sex differences in myocarditis. Results The hearts of male and female mice with myocarditis were significantly enriched for pathways related to an innate and adaptive immune response compared to uninfected controls. When comparing females to males with myocarditis, males were enriched for inflammatory pathways and gene changes that suggested worse mitochondrial transcriptional support (e.g., mitochondrial electron transport genes). In contrast, females were enriched for pathways related to mitochondrial respiration and bioenergetics, which were confirmed by higher transcript levels of master regulators of mitochondrial function including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 (PGC1α), nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF1) and estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRα). TRANSFAC analysis identified ERRa as a transcription factor that may mediate sex differences in mitochondrial function during myocarditis. Conclusions Master regulators of mitochondrial function were elevated in females with myocarditis compared to males and may promote sex differences in mitochondrial respiratory transcript expression during viral myocarditis resulting in less severe myocarditis in females following viral infection.

There is accumulating evidence that reduced exercise capacity is, or can be, an outcome following COVID-19. However, evidence to date relies upon cross-sectional approaches that either do not consider patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease or account for pre-infection exercise capacity data. Accounting for V̇o2peak before COVID-19 and including a group of control patients, we find limited evidence for reduced exercise capacity as a sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease.