Stauder, Michael C.

9 Background: We examined patient-reported fatigue scores and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's Esophagus Registry (EABE). Methods: 1,481 patients enrolled in the EABE between September 2001 and January 2009 returned a baseline quality of life questionnaire including a Linear Analog Self Assessment (LASA) fatigue score which was scored on a 0-10 scale, with 0 as the most extreme fatigue. Patients were categorized as having clinically deficient fatigue (DF) if they reported a score of ≤ 5 and clinically non-deficient fatigue (nDF) if they reported a score of > 5. Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox models explored OS in relation to fatigue scores in patients with EC. Results: A total of 667 patients with EC were included in the EABE, of which 659 returned a registry questionnaire with a valid LASA fatigue score recorded. Median age at the time of registry entry was 65 years (range 23-92). A total of 392 (59%) and 267 patients (41%) reported DF and nDF, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients with nDF had improved 5-year survival compared to patients with DF. In patients having esophagectomy prior to LASA, those reporting nDF had improved survival compared to patients with DF. Similarly, in patients having no esophagectomy prior to LASA, those with nDF had improved survival compared to those with DF. Among the 368 patients with locally advanced EC (LAEC), those reporting nDF had improved 5-year overall survival compared to patients with DF (28% vs 17%, HR = 0.67, p = 0.003). This remained significant on multivariate analysis (HR = 0.71, p = 0.015). Conclusions: Patient-reported fatigue is associated with overall survival in patients with LAEC. As a result, fatigue scores should be considered as a stratification factor in future clinical trial design. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Objectives: To determine long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma treated with trimodality therapy (chemoradiotherapy [CRT] and surgery, TMT) or definitive CRT. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma treated with curative intent at our institution between 1998 and 2004. Identified patients were separated into 3 groups: patients who received TMT, patients who received CRT, and patients who began treatment with trimodality intent but did not undergo surgery (PTMT). Local control, overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Results: Among the 265 patients included, median follow-up was 6.4 years for surviving patients and 1.7 years for all patients. Type of esophageal cancer was adenocarcinoma in 213 patients (80%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 46 patients (17%). Treatment groups comprised 169 patients (64%) completing TMT, 46 patients medically unable to undergo surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (PTMT), and 50 (19%) who underwent CRT. Median OS was 20.5 months; actuarial 5- and 10-year OS were 27% and 12%, respectively. The TMT group had the highest 5- and 10-year OS (32% and 19%, respectively). Local control rates at 2, 5, and 10 years for all patients were 80%, 70%, and 69%, respectively. By treatment modality, 5-year local control was best (82%) for TMT, compared with 60% for CRT and 40% for PTMT groups (P<0.001). Conclusions: Patients who completed TMT had the best local control and long-term OS. In the context of TMT, surgery seemed more beneficial in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma.

Survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma is poor. Studies by Mayo Clinic and the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) have established combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation as the standard of care. Use of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy alone has also been shown to provide a benefit, but 5‑year overall survival still remains less than 5%. Conventional radiotherapy is traditionally delivered over a six week period and high toxicity is seen with the concomitant use of chemotherapy. In contrast, SBRT can be delivered in 3–5 days and, when used as a component of combined modality therapy with gemcitabine, disruption to the timely delivery of chemotherapy is minimal. Early single-institution reports of SBRT for unresectable pancreatic carcinoma demonstrate excellent local control with acceptable toxicity. Use of SBRT in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma warrants further investigation in order to improve the survival of patients with historically poor outcomes.