Kor, Daryl J.

Abstract Background: The dynamic nature of surgical demand poses significant challenges in planning and scheduling resources to staff the surgical suite. Uncertainty in workload often leads to conservative upstream resource allocation, resulting in staffing misallocation. We propose a novel metric, the daily maximum number of open operating rooms (ORs), as an interpretable resource demand proxy to support staff planning. Methods: Using historical surgical data from Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from May 5, 2018 through October 8, 2023 (332,904 surgical cases), we developed a deep learning framework based on a wide-and-deep architecture to predict the daily maximum number of open ORs. The model incorporates features capturing historic OR use trends, seasonality effects, and anesthesia division–specific characteristics. Predictions are generated for forecast horizons of up to 90 business days. Results: Our results demonstrate strong predictive performance, with campus-level root mean square error values ranging from 5 to 7 available ORs across all forecast horizons. Validation across 9 anesthesia divisions confirms the frame- work’s capability to capture complex, nonlinear dependencies within longitudinal surgical datasets. Conclusions: This study introduces a novel operational metric and a robust predictive framework for perioperative resource management. By accurately fore- casting daily maximum open ORs, health care managers can better align staff capacity with anticipated demand, potentially enhancing staff use and improving the patient care experience by minimizing delays.

Background: Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) are leading causes of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. Soluble factors in erythrocyte supernatant may increase risk for these complications. The authors hypothesized that point-of-care allogeneic erythrocyte washing may be an effective intervention to mitigate elevations in soluble factors as well as physiologic responses associated with transfusion-associated respiratory complications in the setting of cardiac surgery. Methods: This is a two-center, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial evaluating point-of-care washed versus standard issue allogeneic erythrocyte transfusions administered during or on the day of cardiac surgery. The primary analysis was performed via modified intention to treat. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in intermediate markers of lung injury as well as cardiopulmonary physiologic responses to erythrocyte transfusion. Secondary outcomes included the duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, durations of mechanical ventilation and oxygen supplementation, presence of TRALI or TACO, and mortality. Results: Among 154 analyzed patients (81 washed, 73 standard issue), the median age was 66 yr, and 77 (50.0%) were women. The median (interquartile range) number of allogeneic erythrocyte units transfused on the day of surgery was 3.0 (2.0 to 5.0) in the washed erythrocyte group and 3.0 (2.0 to 4.0) in the standard issue group (P = 0.13). No between-group differences were identified in any of the assessed recipient lung injury biomarkers (all P values > adjusted alpha). Durations of intensive care unit stay (median [interquartile range], 3.0 [2.0 to 5.0] vs. 3.0 [2.0 to 4.0] days; P = 0.117) and hospital length of stay (12.0 [9.0 to 17.0] vs. 12.0 [9.0 to 17.0] days; P = 0.801) were similar, as were the number of ventilator-free days at day 28 (27.0 [27.0 to 27.0] vs. 27.0 [26.0 to 27.0]; P = 0.699) and oxygen-free days at day 28 (24.0 [19.0 to 26.0] vs. 24.0 [22.0 to 26.0]; P = 0.400). No significant differences were noted in mortality rate or in incidence rates for TRALI, TACO, and acute kidney injury. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with high risk of erythrocyte transfusion, point-of-care washing of allogeneic erythrocyte transfusions did not mitigate changes in intermediate markers of lung injury or cardiopulmonary physiologic responses to erythrocyte transfusion and was not associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Importance Anemia is a common complication of surgery and acute illness that is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The role of anemia prevention and treatment strategies in this setting remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multifaceted anemia management bundle vs standard care on posthospitalization hemoglobin recovery and multidimensional functional outcomes in survivors of acute illness. Design, Setting, and Participants This parallel group randomized clinical trial, known as the Practical Anemia Bundle for Sustained Blood Recovery, was conducted at postsurgical and medical intensive care units at a large US medical center. Critically ill patients (aged ≥18 years) with moderate to severe anemia (hemoglobin concentration <10 g/dL) were enrolled between March 2022 and November 2023. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the intervention or standard care group. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed between July 2024 and January 2025. Intervention The intervention bundle was delivered throughout the duration of hospitalization and included optimized phlebotomy practices, clinical decision support, and pharmacological anemia treatment with intravenous iron. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the mean difference in hemoglobin concentration at 1 month after hospital discharge. Results A total of 100 patients (median [IQR] age, 68 [61-72] years; 57 men [57.0%]; 65 [65.0%] with postsurgical admission to the intensive care unit) were enrolled during acute illness. Forty-nine patients (49.0%) were assigned to receive the intervention, and 51 (51.0%) were assigned to receive standard care. Hemoglobin concentration at 1 month after discharge was greater in patients receiving the intervention vs standard care (median [IQR], 12.2 [11.8-13.0] g/dL vs 11.5 [10.2-12.6] g/dL; adjusted mean difference, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.13-1.20] g/dL; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that a multifaceted anemia prevention and treatment bundle was feasible, was well tolerated, and improved posthospitalization hemoglobin concentrations up to 3 months in critically ill adults. These findings can inform the design of future trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05167734

Interest in the potential applications of artificial intelligence in medicine, anesthesiology, and the world at large has never been higher. The Anesthesia Research Council steering committee formed an anesthesiologist artificial intelligence expert workgroup charged with evaluating the current state of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology, providing examples of future artificial intelligence applications and identifying barriers to artificial intelligence progress. The workgroup’s findings are summarized here, starting with a brief introduction to artificial intelligence for clinicians, followed by overviews of current and anticipated artificial intelligence–focused research and applications in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology’s progress in artificial intelligence is compared to that of other medical specialties, and barriers to artificial intelligence development and implementation in our specialty are discussed. The workgroup’s recommendations address stakeholders in policymaking, research, development, implementation, training, and use of artificial intelligence–based tools for perioperative care.

Interest in the potential applications of artificial intelligence in medicine, anesthesiology, and the world at large has never been higher. The Anesthesia Research Council steering committee formed an anesthesiologist artificial intelligence expert workgroup charged with evaluating the current state of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology, providing examples of future artificial intelligence applications and identifying barriers to artificial intelligence progress. The workgroup’s findings are summarized here, starting with a brief introduction to artificial intelligence for clinicians, followed by overviews of current and anticipated artificial intelligence–focused research and applications in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology’s progress in artificial intelligence is compared to that of other medical specialties, and barriers to artificial intelligence development and implementation in our specialty are discussed. The workgroup’s recommendations address stakeholders in policymaking, research, development, implementation, training, and use of artificial intelligence–based tools for perioperative care.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is common and associated with adverse outcomes in surgical patients. There is limited information to guide the design and implementation of preoperative anemia clinics (PAC), which represents a critical barrier to entry for many practices. METHODS: This is a descriptive observational study highlighting the design and implementation of a multidisciplinary PAC, including key steps in planning, stakeholder engagement, organizational structure, identification of target populations, establishing anemia treatments, information technology and electronic health record integration, provider training, and data infrastructure. Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory results, and anemia treatments for individuals evaluated in the PAC from November 4, 2019 through September 15, 2023 are enumerated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessing changes in anemia symptoms and well-being after surgery are evaluated for 2 subsets of patients (one before PAC implementation [pre-PAC], another after PAC implementation [post-PAC]), without formal statistical comparison given limited sample sizes. RESULTS: The PAC was initiated as a multidisciplinary effort under support from a Mayo Clinic Practice Transformation Award in 2019, including broad representation from anesthesiology, surgery, and medical practices, along with institutional project management support (eg, project manager, information technologists, systems engineers). While initially limited to cardiac surgery patients, the PAC underwent planned incremental expansion to include other surgical services. Over the study period, 1188 PAC consultations across 1159 unique patients met eligibility criteria, with a median age of 66 (57–73) years and 58.1% women. The most common etiology of anemia was iron deficiency (69.1%) followed by anemia related to cancer (17.3%). Anemia-directed therapies were recommended in 1038 (87.4%) encounters, with 730 (70.3%) of those receiving recommended treatment preoperatively. Seven hundred nine (97.1%) treatments included intravenous iron and 146 (20.0%) included erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Fifteen pre-PAC and 38 post-PAC implementation patients completed PROs. PAC implementation was accompanied by earlier resolution of anemia symptoms and less pronounced declines in postoperative well-being scores. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights the key steps for successful PAC implementation. Treatment is possible for most patients and may be accompanied by improvements in patient-important outcomes.

AbstractBackgroundSome patients express concerns regarding receipt of allogeneic blood transfusions from donors potentially vaccinated against SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐19). However, limited information exists about patients' expression of these concerns or how to address them during the blood transfusion consent process. In this study, we describe our experience of working collaboratively with patients with vaccine‐related transfusion concerns prior to elective surgery, summarizing treatment decisions and clinical outcomes.Study Design and MethodsThis observational descriptive study includes patients seen in our Bloodless Medicine and Surgery clinic between June 2022 and June 2024 for vaccine‐related transfusion concerns prior to elective surgery. A shared decision‐making framework was employed to foster conversation, share information, provide reassurance, reconcile conflict, and match preferences with available care options. Patient characteristics, treatment decisions, and surgical outcomes were reviewed and summarized.ResultsThirty‐five patients were included, with median (1st, 3rd quartile) age of 61 (53, 69) years. Cardiac surgery was the most common type of surgery (29%). Twelve patients (34%) were anemic preoperatively, and all received preoperative treatment. After discussion with a Bloodless Medicine specialist, 24 (68.6%) decided to consent to the use of all blood products, 5 (14.3%) accepted only red blood cells, and 6 (17.1%) declined all blood products. Among 28 patients undergoing surgery, only 4 (14%) received allogeneic transfusion perioperatively.ConclusionMany patients concerned about the vaccination status of blood donors may ultimately consent to allogeneic blood products after shared decision‐making with a Bloodless Medicine specialist, highlighting the importance of patient empowerment and collaborative care.

AbstractBackgroundEvaluations of critical bleeding and massive transfusion have focused on traumatic hemorrhage. However, most critical bleeding in hospitalized patients occurs outside trauma. The purpose of this study was to provide an in‐depth description examining the critical administration threshold (CAT; ≥3 units red blood cells (RBCs) in a 1‐h period) occurrences in nontraumatic hemorrhage. This will assist in establishing the framework for future investigations in nontraumatic hemorrhage.MethodsThis is an observational cohort study of adults experiencing critical bleeding defined as being CAT+ during hospitalization from 2016 to 2021 at a single academic institution. A CAT episode started with administration of the first qualifying RBC unit and ended at the time of completion of the last allogeneic unit prior to a ≥4‐h gap without subsequent transfusion. The primary goal was to describe demographic, clinical and transfusion characteristics of participants with nontraumatic critical bleeding.Results2433 patients suffered critical bleeding, most often occurring in the operating room (71.1%) followed by the intensive care unit (20.8%). 57% occurred on the initial day of hospitalization, with a median duration of 138 (36, 303) minutes. The median number of RBCs transfused during the episode was 5 (4, 8), with median total allogeneic units of 9 (4, 9). Hospital mortality was 19.2%. The most common cause of death was multi‐organ failure (50.3%), however death within 24 h was due to exsanguination (72.7%).DiscussionThe critical administration threshold may be employed to identify critical bleeding in non‐trauma settings of life‐threatening hemorrhage, with a mortality rate of approximately 20%.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is associated with adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery, yet it remains unclear what proportion of this association is mediated through red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. METHODS: This is a historical observational cohort study of adults undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass at an academic medical center between May 1, 2008, and May 1, 2018. A mediation analysis framework was used to evaluate the associations between preoperative anemia and postoperative outcomes, including a primary outcome of acute kidney injury (AKI). Intraoperative RBC transfusions were evaluated as mediators of preoperative anemia and outcome relationships. The estimated total effect, average direct effect of preoperative anemia, and percent of the total effect mediated through transfusions are presented with 95% confidence intervals and P -values. RESULTS: A total of 4117 patients were included, including 1234 (30%) with preoperative anemia. Overall, 437 of 4117 (11%) patients went on to develop AKI, with a greater proportion of patients having preoperative anemia (219 of 1234 [18%] vs 218 of 2883 [8%]). In multivariable analyses, the presence of preoperative anemia was associated with increased postoperative AKI (6.4% [4.2%–8.7%] absolute difference in percent with AKI, P < .001), with incremental decreases in preoperative hemoglobin concentrations displaying greater AKI risk (eg, 11.9% [6.9%–17.5%] absolute increase in probability of AKI for preoperative hemoglobin of 9 g/dL compared to a reference of 14 g/dL, P < .001). The association between preoperative anemia and postoperative AKI was primarily due to direct effects of preoperative anemia (5.9% [3.6%–8.3%] absolute difference, P < .001) rather than mediated through intraoperative RBC transfusions (7.5% [−4.3% to 21.1%] of the total effect mediated by transfusions, P = .220). Preoperative anemia was also associated with longer hospital durations (1.07 [1.05–1.10] ratio of geometric mean length of stay, P < .001). Of this total effect, 38% (22%, 62%; P < .001) was estimated to be mediated through subsequent intraoperative RBC transfusion. Preoperative anemia was not associated with reoperation or vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anemia was associated with higher odds of AKI and longer hospitalizations in cardiac surgery. The attributable effects of anemia and transfusion on postoperative complications are likely to differ across outcomes. Future studies are necessary to further evaluate mechanisms of anemia-associated postoperative organ injury and treatment strategies.